Literature DB >> 35515716

Reliability of assessment of medical students' non-technical skills using a behavioural marker system: does clinical experience matter?

Benjamin Clarke1,2, Samantha E Smith2, Emma Claire Phillips1,3, Ailsa Hamilton1, Joanne Kerins4, Victoria R Tallentire1,2.   

Abstract

Introduction: Non-technical skills are recognised to play an integral part in safe and effective patient care. Medi-StuNTS (Medical Students' Non-Technical Skills) is a behavioural marker system developed to enable assessment of medical students' non-technical skills. This study aimed to assess whether newly trained raters with high levels of clinical experience could achieve reliability coefficients of >0.7 and to compare differences in inter-rater reliability of raters with varying clinical experience.
Methods: Forty-four raters attended a workshop on Medi-StuNTS before independently rating three videos of medical students participating in immersive simulation scenarios. Data were grouped by raters' levels of clinical experience. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
Results: Eleven raters with more than 10 years of clinical experience achieved single-measure ICC of 0.37 and average-measures ICC of 0.87. Fourteen raters with more than or equal to 5 years and less than 10 years of clinical experience achieved single-measure ICC of 0.09 and average-measures ICC of 0.59. Nineteen raters with less than 5 years of clinical experience achieved single-measure ICC of 0.09 and average-measures ICC 0.65. Conclusions: Using 11 newly trained raters with high levels of clinical experience produced highly reliable ratings that surpassed the prespecified inter-rater reliability standard; however, a single rater from this group would not achieve sufficiently reliable ratings. This is consistent with previous studies using other medical behavioural marker systems. This study demonstrated a decrease in inter-rater reliability of raters with lower levels of clinical experience, suggesting caution when using this population as raters for assessment of non-technical skills. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical Student; Non-Technical Skills; Reliability; Simulation Based Education

Year:  2020        PMID: 35515716      PMCID: PMC8936703          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  28 in total

1.  Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data.

Authors:  Steven M Downing
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Development of a rating system for surgeons' non-technical skills.

Authors:  S Yule; R Flin; S Paterson-Brown; N Maran; D Rowley
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  Observational assessment of surgical teamwork: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Shabnam Undre; Andrew N Healey; Ara Darzi; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Non-technical skills assessments in undergraduate medical education: A focused BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 54.

Authors:  Morris Gordon; Jeanne Farnan; Ciaran Grafton-Clarke; Ridwaan Ahmed; Dawne Gurbutt; John McLachlan; Michelle Daniel
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  Devising a consensus definition and framework for non-technical skills in healthcare to support educational design: A modified Delphi study.

Authors:  Morris Gordon; Paul Baker; Ken Catchpole; Daniel Darbyshire; Dawn Schocken
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US.

Authors:  Martin A Makary; Michael Daniel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-05-03

7.  Exploring transformative learning when developing medical students' non-technical skills.

Authors:  Joanne Kerins; Samantha Eve Smith; Emma Claire Phillips; Benjamin Clarke; Ailsa Lauren Hamilton; Victoria Ruth Tallentire
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  A human factors analysis of technical and team skills among surgical trainees during procedural simulations in a simulated operating theatre.

Authors:  Krishna Moorthy; Yaron Munz; Sally Adams; Vikas Pandey; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Anaesthesia non-technical skills: Can anaesthetists be trained to reliably use this behavioural marker system in 1 day?

Authors:  J Graham; G Hocking; E Giles
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Anaesthesiology students' Non-Technical skills: development and evaluation of a behavioural marker system for students (AS-NTS).

Authors:  Parisa Moll-Khosrawi; Anne Kamphausen; Wolfgang Hampe; Leonie Schulte-Uentrop; Stefan Zimmermann; Jens Christian Kubitz
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.