| Literature DB >> 35515624 |
Murugesan Manoj1, Jinbo Song1, Wenjian Zhu1, Hu Zhou2, Junhao Zhang1, Palaniappan Meena3, Aihua Yuan1.
Abstract
In the present work, a hydroxyapatite anchored nitrogen-doped three-dimensional graphene (HAp-N3DG) skeletal network (foam) based nanostructured ceramic framework (CF) was developed through a polymer-assisted solvothermal route. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies reveal that the nano sized 0D HAp particles are anchored on the N3DG skeletal network with an average size of less than 50 nm. EDX and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis confirmed the presence of Ca, P, O, N, and C. In addition, XPS analysis reveals the existence of N-C bonds in the prepared sample. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns indicate the presence of hexagonal phase hydroxyapatite and the calculated average crystallite size was found to be 12 nm. The developed HAp-N3DG foam based nanostructured CF was found to have a mesoporous structure and the measured specific surface area (SSA) and the mean pore diameter were found to be 64.73 m2 g-1 and 23.6 nm, respectively. Electrochemical analysis shows that HAp anchored on nitrogen-doped 3D graphene foam based nanostructured CF has moderate electrochemical activity towards lithium ion charge/discharge. In addition, the prepared material showed adsorption activity values of 204.89 mg g-1 and 243.89 mg g-1 for the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) benzene and toluene, respectively. The present findings suggest that the newly developed HAp anchored nitrogen-doped 3DG (HAp-N3DG) skeletal network (foam) based nanostructured CF material can be used in energy devices and in the removal of volatile organic compounds. Moreover, the present study initiates a new kind of approach in energy device (lithium ion battery-LIB) research and in the removal of VOCs. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35515624 PMCID: PMC9053610 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra01852j
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1Schematic illustration of the synthetic process of HAp anchored N3DG foam based nanostructured CF.
Fig. 2XRD patterns of (a) 3D graphene on Ni foam, (b) Ni-etched 3D graphene foam, (c) pure hydroxyapatite, (d) hydroxyapatite on N-doped 3D graphene nanostructured ceramic framework.
Fig. 3Raman spectra of (a) commercial 3D graphene on Ni foam and (b) HAp anchored N3DG nanostructured CF.
Fig. 4FESEM images of (a) 3DG on Ni foam, (b) Ni etched 3DG foam, (c) HAp anchored N3DG ceramic framework, (d) TEM image of HAp-N3DG, and (e) elemental mapping of HAp-N3DG.
Fig. 5XPS spectra of HAp-N3DG nanostructured CF (a) the survey spectrum, (b) carbon, (c) nitrogen, (d) calcium, (e) phosphorus, and (f) oxygen.
Fig. 6Adsorption–desorption isotherm of HAp anchored N3DG nanostructured CF (inset: pore diameter).
Fig. 7Electrochemical performance of HAp anchored N3DG nanostructured CF (a) charge–discharge analysis, (b) cyclic voltammogram, and (c) electrochemical impedance spectrum.
Fig. 8Adsorption graphs of HAp-N3DG nanostructured CF for (a) benzene and (b) toluene adsorption.
Adsorption of benzene and toluene by different kinds of adsorbents under different reaction conditions
| S. no. | Type of material | Method | SSA (m2 g−1) | Pore volume/pore diameter | Adsorption capacity | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benzene | Toluene | ||||||
| 1. | Activated carbon impregnated cellulose acetate electrospun mats | Quartz crystal microbalance method (single nozzle system); Dubinin–Astakhov equation | 21.57 | — | 352 (μg cm−2 g−1) | — |
|
| 2. | Granular activated carbon commercially purchased | Laboratory-scale packed-bed adsorber method; break-through curve; deactivation model | 804.6 | 0.4734 (cm3 g−1) 23.54 Å (av. pore dia.) | 27.50 (mg g−1) | 59.20 (mg g−1) |
|
| 3. | Activated carbon bed – Picactif NC60 commercially purchased | Calorimetric method (differential scanning calorimetry coupled with a thermobalance) | 1240 | Microporous 0.55 nm | — | 424.40 (mg g−1) |
|
| 4. | Granular commercial activated carbon | Flow adsorption technique (isothermal adsorption device) | 951.5 | 0.5175 (mL g−1) 0.67 nm | — | 364.96 (mg g−1) |
|
| 5. | Commercial activated carbon | Gravimetric adsorption method | 990 | 0.094 (cm3 g−1)2.7 nm | 161.42 (mg g−1) | 109.45 (mg g−1) |
|
| 6. | Commercial activated carbon monolith | Vapor-solid adsorption isotherm method (gravimetric adsorption equilibrium apparatus) | 603 | — | — | 366.72 (mg g−1) |
|
| 7. | Graphene oxide & reduced graphene oxide sheets | Cyclic adsorption/desorption | 236.4, 292.6 | 3.8–4.8 (nm), 4.6–6.2 (nm) | 276.4 (mg g−1) | 304.4 (mg g−1) |
|
| 8. | Microporous graphitized biocarbon | Adsorption isotherms at ultra-low pressure (micromeritics 3Flex); TPD experiment | 2085.2 | 0.792 (cm3 g−1) narrow super-micro pores (6.8–8.8 Å) | 5.8 (mmol g−1) | 5.2 (mmol g−1) |
|
| 9. | Graphene nanosheets | Batch adsorption study; Langmuir–Freundlich adsorption isotherm, nonlinear method | 392 | Mesoporous | 126 (mg g−1) | 149 (mg g−1) |
|
| 10. | Commercial activated carbon; sulfonated carbon; ordered mesoporous carbon (CMK8 & 3) | Isosorp static gravimetric sorption analysis | 2336, 510, 1224 & 1078 | Mesoporous | 14 (mmol g−1), very low | — |
|
| 11. | Mesoporous graphene (thermally reduced oxide graphene powder) | Gas detector tube (GASTEC) | 542 | Mesoporous | — | 93% |
|
| 12. | Paraffin/surfactant/water emulsion (PSW-5) | Packed bed bubble column reactor | — | — | — | 90.77%, 1650 (mg m−3) |
|
| 13. | HAp anchored on nitrogen doped 3D graphene (foam) (nanostructured ceramic framework) | Standard static volumetric method | 64.73 | Mesoporous; 0.3834 (cm3 g−1) 23.6 nm | 204.89, (mg g−1) | 243.89, (mg g−1) |
|