| Literature DB >> 35515536 |
Kaïs Rtibi1, Slimen Selmi1, Dalanda Wannes1, Mourad Jridi2, Lamjed Marzouki1, Hichem Sebai1.
Abstract
Thyme is a rich source of bioactive phytochemicals and it is frequently used in folk-medicine to treat gastroenteritis irritations. The current study was performed to examine the potential of Thymus vulgaris aqueous extract (TV-AE) to protect against delayed gastric emptying (DGE) and colonic constipation in rats. Stomach ulcer was caused by a single oral dose administration of indomethacin (INDO) (30 mg kg-1 of body weight). Constipation was induced following intravenous intoxication of rats with vinblastine (VINB) (2 mg kg-1 of body weight) for one week. The effect of TV-AE at two graduated doses (100 and 200 mg kg-1) on DGE, gastrointestinal transit (GIT) and constipated rats and biochemical parameters was estimated using phenol red, charcoal meal test and colorimetric methods, respectively. The phytochemical-profile of TV-AE was explored using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with photodiode array detection and electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (HPLC-PDA/ESI-MS). INDO and VINB caused a significant reduction in (P < 0.05) DGE and GIT and colonic motility dysfunction. TV-AE consumption remarkably (P < 0.05) attenuated the DGE (from 58.56% to 69.871%) and difficulty in evacuating stools (from 48.5 to 55.5 fecal pellets per rat) and balanced the GIT (65% to 71%). These GI-ameliorative effects were accompanied by reversed INDO/VINB-related oxidative changes, lipid-metabolism alteration and intracellular pathway moderation. HPLC-PDA/ESI-MS-analysis identified several chemical constituents including rosmarinic acid, quinic acid, luteolin-7-o-glucoside, protocatechuic acid and trans-cinnamic acid. Thus, TV-AE bioactive components may be used as medicinal substances to regulate/attenuate gastrointestinal-physiological activities and disturbances, which support its pharmacological use. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35515536 PMCID: PMC9065799 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra02042j
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1Chromatographic profiles and characterization of phenolic compounds in TV-AE.
High-resolution liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization (LC-HRESIMS) TV-AE component identification
| Name | Molecular formula | PubChem CID | [M]−H | Retention time | Concentration (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quinic acid | C7H12O6 | 6508 | 191.00 | 1.978 | 364.647 |
| Gallic acid | C7H6O5 | 370 | 169.00 | 3.989 | 6.688 |
| Protocatechuic acid | C7H6O4 | 72 | 153.00 | 6.890 | 46.790 |
| Catechin(+) | C15H14O6 | 73 160 | 289.00 | 11.382 | 1.311 |
| Chlorogenic acid | C16H18O9 | 1 794 427 | 353.00 | 11.615 | 2.493 |
| 4- | C16H18O9 | 5 281 780 | 353.00 | 11.612 | 2.558 |
| Caffeic acid | C9H8O4 | 689 043 | 179.00 | 14.603 | 37.468 |
| Syringic acid | C9H10O5 | 10 742 | 197.00 | 16.190 | 24.471 |
|
| C9H8O3 | 637 542 | 163.00 | 21.061 | 17.003 |
|
| C10H10O4 | 445 858 | 193.00 | 23.276 | 3.501 |
| Hyperoside (quercetin-3- | C21H20O12 | 5 281 643 | 463.00 | 24.864 | 10.149 |
| Rutin | C27H30O16 | 5 280 805 | 609.00 | 23.941 | 28.653 |
|
| C9H8O3 | 637 540 | 163.00 | 26.598 | 1.258 |
| Luteolin-7- | C21H20O11 | 5 280 637 | 447.00 | 24.800 | 46.983 |
| 3,4-Di- | C25H24O12 | 5 281 780 | 515.00 | 25.146 | 24.494 |
| Quercetrin (quercetin-3- | C21H20O11 | 15 939 939 | 447.00 | 27.267 | 7.219 |
| Rosmarinic acid | C18H16O8 | 5 315 615 | 359.00 | 26.434 | 5066.278 |
| Naringin | C27H32O14 | 442 428 | 579.00 | 26.168 | 11.984 |
| Apigenin-7- | C21H20O10 | 45 933 926 | 431.00 | 27.291 | 3.393 |
|
| C9H8O2 | 444 539 | 147.00 | 32.184 | 41.109 |
| Quercetin | C15H10O7 | 5 280 343 | 301.00 | 32.175 | 35.730 |
| Kampherol | C15H10O6 | 5 280 863 | 285.00 | 32.218 | 35.972 |
| Naringenin | C15H12O5 | 439 246 | 271.00 | 34.164 | 37.425 |
| Silymarin | C25H22O10 | 31 553 | 481.00 | 34.290 | 1.547 |
| Apigenin | C15H10O5 | 5 280 443 | 269.00 | 34.768 | 35.701 |
| Luteolin | C15H10O6 | 5 280 445 | 285.00 | 35.175 | 1.270 |
| Acacetin | C16H12O5 | 5 280 442 | 283.00 | 40.566 | 11.362 |
The compounds are suggested according to the dictionary of natural products and the characteristic fragmentation pattern.
The formulas were deduced from the quasi molecular ion peak [M + H]+.
VINB/TV-AE actions on gastrointestinal motility in healthy and intoxicated ratsa
| Group | Dose | Gastro-intestinal motility (%) | Reduction activity (%) | Reinforcement (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (NaCl) | (5 mL kg−1) | 70.65 ± 3.63 | — | — |
| Clonidine | (1 mg kg−1) | 28.23 ± 1.77* | 60.04 | — |
| VINB | (2 mg kg−1) | 65.12 ± 1.66* | 07.82 | — |
| TV-AE alone | (100 mg kg−1) | 77.92 ± 3.45*# | — | 10.29 |
| (200 mg kg−1) | 83.74 ± 2.88*# | — | 18.52 | |
| VINB/TV-AE | (100 mg kg−1) | 68.90 ± 2.18# | — | 5.80 |
| (200 mg kg−1) | 71.33 ± 3.46# | — | 09.53 |
Rats were intoxicated with VINB (2 mg kg−1) for one week. Then, the animals were treated with two increasing doses of TV-AE or reference molecule (clonidine, 1 mg kg−1). 2 h later, the rats were given the standard charcoal meal (10% charcoal in 5% gum arabic) or vehicle (NaCl, 0.9%). Data are expressed as mean ± standard error (n = 7); *P < 0.05 versus control group, #P < 0.05 versus VINB-group.
Identification of parameters following acute drug disorders and TV-AE effectsa
| Rat group | Fecal parameters on day 5 (collection for 24 h) | Gastric mucosa injury indicators | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fecal pellet (n) | Wet weight (g/24 h/rat) | Dry weight (g/24 h/rat) | Water content (%) | Ulcer index | Gastric juice volume (mL) | Gastric juice pH | |
| CONT (NaCl) | 56.23 ± 3.00 | 6.77 ± 4.64 | 3.21 ± 0.33 | 39.08 ± 3.10 | 0.23 ± 0.04 | 2.04 ± 0.14 | 3.46 ± 0.09 |
| VINB (2 mg kg−1) | 48.64 ± 3.21* | 4.23 ± 0.21* | 2.22 ± 0.70* | 27.66 ± 2.63* | — | — | — |
| INDO (30 mg kg−1) | — | — | — | — | 19.77 ± 1.56 | 4.44 ± 0.16 | 2.31 ± 0.06 |
| TV-AE (100 mg kg−1) | 51.11 ± 2.90* | 4.93 ± 0.55* | 2.97 ± 0.61* | 31.17 ± 3.55* | 10.64 ± 1.20* | 2.62 ± 0.37*# | 2.87 ± 0.12*# |
| TV-AE (200 mg kg−1) | 55.50 ± 1.72# | 5.64 ± 0.81# | 3.24 ± 0.10# | 37.44 ± 2.85# | 3.00 ± 0.06* | 2.12 ± 0.22# | 3.72 ± 0.10# |
VINB/INDO alterations reflected by indicated parameters and assessed in healthy rats and rats treated with VINB (2 mg kg−1) or INDO (30 mg kg−1). Data are expressed as mean ± standard error (n = 7); *P < 0.05 versus control group, #P < 0.05 versus VINB/INDO groups.
Fig. 2Effect of TV-AE on INDO-induced delayed gastric emptying. Animals were treated 1 h prior to the test meal (50 mg phenol red in 100 mL aqueous methyl cellulose) with two doses of TV-AE (100 and 200 mg kg−1). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM; n = 7 in each group. Data was analyzed by Statview ANOVA. *P < 0.05 compared to control group, #P < 0.05 compared to INDO group.
Fig. 3(a and b) Acute effect of TV-AE (100 and 200 mg kg−1, respectively) on INDO/VINB-induced changes in gastric and colonic mucosal MDA, SH group and protein carbonyls levels. *P < 0.05 compared to control group, #P < 0.05 compared to INDO and VINB-groups. Values are means ± SEM (n = 7).
Fig. 4(a and b) Acute effect of TV-AE (100 and 200 mg kg−1, respectively) on INDO/VINB-induced depletion in gastric and colonic mucosal enzymatic antioxidant activities. *P < 0.05 compared to control-group, #P < 0.05 compared to INDO and VINB-groups. Values are means ± SEM (n = 7).
VINB/INDO/TV-AE actions on intracellular mediator disturbances in healthy and treated ratsa
| Group | Dose | H2O2 (μmol mg−1 protein) | Free iron (nmol mg−1 protein) | Calcium (10−3 nmol mg−1 protein) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONT (NaCl) | (5 mL kg−1) | 09.05 ± 0.33 | 11.34 ± 0.06 | 33.67 ± 3.57 |
| VINB | (2 mg kg−1) | 25.77 ± 2.13* | 7.04 ± 0.17* | 19.47 ± 2.07* |
| VINB/TV-AE | (100 mg kg−1) | 24.70 ± 2.11*# | 9.24 ± 0.21 | 22.99 ± 0.84* |
| (200 mg kg−1) | 11.98 ± 1.22# | 10.24 ± 0.06# | 28.90 ± 1.34# | |
| INDO | (30 mg kg−1) | 37.33 ± 2.29* | 04.28 ± 0.07* | 21.38 ± 1.01* |
| INDO/TV-AE | (100 mg kg−1) | 19.15 ± 1.37*# | 07.52 ± 0.20*# | 27.10 ± 0.74# |
| (200 mg kg−1) | 12.65 ± 0.93# | 09.35 ± 0.13# | 30.80 ± 2.21# |
VINB/INDO/TV-AE effects were reflected by intracellular mediators assessed in healthy rats and rats treated with VINB (2 mg kg−1) or INDO (30 mg kg−1). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM; n = 7 in each group. Data was analyzed by Statview ANOVA. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error (n = 7); *P < 0.05 versus control group, #P < 0.05 versus VINB/INDO-groups.
VINB/INDO/TV-AE actions on serum lipid metabolism disruptions in healthy and treated ratsa
| Group | Dose | Triacylglycerol (mg dL−1) | Total cholesterol (mg dL−1) | HDL-cholesterol (mg dL−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONT (NaCl) | (5 mL kg−1) | 80.00 ± 5.28 | 61.34 ± 4.51 | 32.13 ± 2.45 |
| VINB | (2 mg kg−1) | 78.40 ± 6.81 | 62.03 ± 5.12 | 30.40 ± 2.30 |
| VINB/TV-AE | (100 mg kg−1) | 77.37 ± 4.02 | 61.45 ± 3.59 | 33.12 ± 0.93 |
| (200 mg kg−1) | 79.80 ± 2.87 | 60.23 ± 5.10 | 26.06 ± 1.21*# | |
| INDO | (30 mg kg−1) | 67.12 ± 3.50* | 78.22 ± 2.15* | 35.46 ± 1.57 |
| INDO/TV-AE | (100 mg kg−1) | 70.59 ± 4.21* | 75.68 ± 3.17* | 40.16 ± 3.55*# |
| (200 mg kg−1) | 81.35 ± 5.32# | 63.27 ± 4.22# | 44.86 ± 2.22*# |
VINB/INDO/TV-AE effects were reflected by serum lipid metabolism assessed in healthy rats and rats treated with VINB (2 mg kg−1) or INDO (30 mg kg−1). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM; n = 7 in each group. Data was analyzed by Statview ANOVA. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error (n = 7); *P < 0.05 versus control group, #P < 0.05 versus VINB/INDO-groups.