| Literature DB >> 35514883 |
Damian Krystian Kaczmarek1, Anna Parus1, Marek Łożyński1, Juliusz Pernak1.
Abstract
A simple, efficient, and environmentally friendly synthesis method for bioproducts based on indole-3-butyric acid and amino acids, glycine betaine or choline has been developed. Spectral analysis and molecular calculations were used to determine whether the products were ammonium salts or binary mixtures. Moreover, it was observed that the ammonium salts degraded more rapidly than the binary mixtures when exposed to light. The structures of the products significantly impacted their thermal stability and phase transitions. Biological studies clearly showed that the synthesized products were more effective than a reference commercial preparation as a rooting agent and have significant potential as new biologically active agents with low environmental impact. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35514883 PMCID: PMC9058124 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra09136g
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Products synthesized using IBA
| No. | Cation/component | pH of aqueous solutions (1%) |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 4.94 | 181 | — | — | 351 |
| 2 |
| 5.61 | 110 | 93 | — | 348 |
| 3 |
| 6.02 | 112 | — | 13 | 290 |
| 4 | Betaine | 7.23 | — | — | 2 | 218 |
| 5 | Choline | 7.03 | — | — | −18.0 | 207 |
| IBA | — | 3.54 | 120 | — | — | 200 |
T c – crystallization temperature.
T m – melting point.
T g – glass transition temperature.
T 0.05 – decomposition temperature of 5% sample.
Data from literature.[26]
Fig. 1Optimized structures of products 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bond parameters calculated for B3LYP/6-31++G(d,p) in equimolar binary mixtures and ion pairs of indole-3-butyric acid and arginine, histidine and betaine in water
| No | Total charge [a.u.] | Hydrogen bond | Intermolecular hydrogen bond parameters length (Å), angle (degree) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1a | 0 | N1Arg_guaH⋯O1IBA | 1.841 (148.3) |
| N2Arg_guaH⋯O1IBA | 1.832 (148.1) | ||
| NArg_ammH⋯O1Arg | 1.830 (122.3) | ||
| NIBA_IndH⋯O1Arg | 1.857 (160.9) | ||
| 1b | 0 | N1Arg_guaH⋯O1IBA | 1.790 (164.3) |
| N1Arg_guaH⋯O2IBA | 2.552 (106.3) | ||
| NArg_ammH1⋯O1IBA | 1.663 (175.5) | ||
| NArg_ammH2⋯O1Arg | 1.881 (122.0) | ||
| 2a | 0 | NIBA_IndH⋯O1His | 1.954 (158.2) |
| NHis_ammH⋯O1His | 1.809 (123.8) | ||
| C(O)O1HIBA⋯N1His Imid | 1.709 (163.8) | ||
| 2b | 0 | NHis_ammH⋯O1His | 1.872 (122.0) |
| NHis_ammH⋯O1IBA | 1.657 (170.4) | ||
| N1His_ImH⋯O1IBA | 1.538 (159.3) | ||
| N1His_ImH⋯O2IBA | 2.911 (151.2) | ||
| 3a | 0 | NPro_ammH1⋯O1IBA | 1.770 (169.2) |
| C(O)O1HIBA⋯O1Pro | 1.586 (170.8) | ||
| 3b | 0 | NPro_ammH1⋯O1IBA | 1.532 (175.4) |
| C(O)O1HPro⋯O2IBA | 1.426 (169.0) | ||
| 3c | 0 | C(O)O1HIBA⋯NPro_amm | 1.447 (175.4) |
| C(O)O1HPro⋯O2IBA | 1.603 (168.6) | ||
| 31 | −1 | NPro_ammH1⋯O1IBA | 1.561 (174.9) |
| NPro_ammH1⋯O2IBA | 2.667 (126.6) | ||
| NPro_ammH2⋯O1Pro | 1.978 (119.3) | ||
| 4a | 0 | C(O)O1HIBA⋯O1Bet | 1.621 (170.4) |
| C(O)O1HIBA⋯O2Bet | 3.081 (133.8) | ||
| NIBA_IndH⋯O2Bet | 1.923 (161.5) | ||
| 4b | −1 | Cbet2H⋯O1IBA | 2.927 (144.1) |
| CMet1H⋯O1IBA | 2.934 (141.8) | ||
| CMet1H⋯O2IBA | 2.314 (168.6) | ||
| CMet2H⋯O1IBA | 2.358 (166.5) | ||
| CMet2H⋯O1Bet | 2.334 (122.6) | ||
| CMet3H⋯O1Bet | 2.262 (123.8) | ||
| NIBA_IndH⋯O2Bet | 1.860 (166.5) |
Intramolecular hydrogen bond between ammonium group and carboxylate of arginine.
Intramolecular hydrogen bond between N-methyl group and carboxylate of betaine.
Eutectic.
Electronic energy (Hartree) and complexation energy of ionic or neutral components of ion pairs or binary mixtures in water environment for geometries calculated at B3LYP/6-31++G(d,p) level
| No. | Total charge [a.u.] | Class of compound | Type of interaction | [Hartree] | Complexation energy [kcal mol−1] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1a | 0 | Protonated amino acid + acid anion | +Gua–−O2C | −1277.0433542 | −19.2 |
| 1b | 0 | Protonated amino acid + acid anion | +Gua–−O2C | −1277.0456456 | −11.7 |
| +NH3–−O2C | |||||
| 2a | 0 | Zwitterion of amino acid + acid | 0Imid–HO(O)C | −1219.2429738 | −13.5 |
| 2b | 0 | Protonated amino acid + acid anion | +NH3–−O2C | −1219.2446678 | −28.8 |
| 3a | 0 | Zwitterion of amino acid + acid | +NH2–−O2C | −1071.6216155 | −15.1 |
| CO2−–HO(O)C | |||||
| 3b | 0 | Protonated amino acid + acid anion | +NH2–−O2C | −1071.6171871 | −38.4 |
| C(O)OH–−O2C | |||||
| 3c | 0 | Amino acid + acid | 0Amino-HO(O)C | −1071.6140875 | −28.1 |
| C(O)OH–OC(OH) | |||||
| 31 | −1 | Zwitterion of amino acid + acid anion | +NH2–−O2C | −1071.1582504 | −14.0 |
| 4a | 0 | Betaine + acid | C(O)OH–−O2C | −1072.8026406 | −14.1 |
| 4b | −1 | Betaine + acid anion | +NR4–−O2C | −1072.3263498 | −3.3 |
Structure 1a is of 1.44 kcal mol−1 less stable than structure 1b.
Structure 2a is of 1.06 kcal mol−1 less stable than structure 2b.
Structure 3b is of 2.78 kcal mol−1 less stable than 3a.
Structure 3c is of 4.72 kcal mol−1 less stable than 3a.
Structure energies of 4a and 4b cannot be compared due to the difference in overall structure charge.
Fig. 2Influence of IBA and HCl on chemical shifts of l-arginine cation in 1H NMR spectrum.
Fig. 3Influence of IBA and HCl on chemical shifts of l-proline in 1H NMR spectrum.
Fig. 4Structures of obtained ammonium salts (1 and 2) and binary mixtures (3 and 4).
Fig. 5Change in IBA (acid or anion) content in aqueous solutions stored at constant light intensity (A) and in the dark (B).
Fig. 6Effect of IBA concentration on mustard seed germination capacity on second day.
Fig. 7Effect of ammonium salts and binary mixtures containing 25 mg L−1 indole-3-butyric acid on mustard shoot development and root length.