Literature DB >> 35514866

Working memory is limited: improving knowledge transfer by optimising simulation through cognitive load theory.

Michael Meguerdichian1, Katie Walker2, Komal Bajaj3.   

Abstract

This analysis explores how to optimise knowledge transfer in healthcare simulation by applying cognitive load theory to curriculum design and delivery for both novice and expert learners. This is particularly relevant for interprofessional learning which is team-based, as each participant comes to the simulation experience with different levels of expertise. Healthcare simulation can offer opportunities to create complex and dynamic experiences that replicate real clinical situations. Understanding Cognitive Load Theory can foster the acquisition of complex knowledge, skills and abilities required to deliver excellence in patient care without overwhelming a learner's ability to handle new materials due to working memory limitations. The 2 aspects of working memory that will be explored in this paper are intrinsic load and extrinsic load. These will be addressed in terms of the learner's level of expertise and how to consider these elements to enhance the learning environment in simulation scenario development and delivery. By applying the concepts of Cognitive Load Theory, this paper offers educators a method to tailor their curricula to navigate working memory and optimise the opportunity for knowledge transfer. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive Load; Curriculum Design; Knowledge Transfer; Simulation Education; Working Memory

Year:  2016        PMID: 35514866      PMCID: PMC8936700          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  44 in total

1.  Learning needs assessment: assessing the need.

Authors:  Janet Grant
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-19

2.  Using a learning needs assessment to identify knowledge deficits regarding procedural sedation for pediatric patients.

Authors:  Anne D Jest; Andrea Tonge
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.676

3.  Simulation and adult learning.

Authors:  Ernest E Wang
Journal:  Dis Mon       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.800

Review 4.  The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23.

Authors:  Jill Elizabeth Thistlethwaite; David Davies; Samilia Ekeocha; Jane M Kidd; Colin MacDougall; Paul Matthews; Judith Purkis; Diane Clay
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  Developing the master learner: applying learning theory to the learner, the teacher, and the learning environment.

Authors:  Daniel J Schumacher; Robert Englander; Carol Carraccio
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 6.  Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies.

Authors:  Jeroen J G van Merriënboer; John Sweller
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Emotion, cognitive load and learning outcomes during simulation training.

Authors:  Kristin Fraser; Irene Ma; Elise Teteris; Heather Baxter; Bruce Wright; Kevin McLaughlin
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  Contextual information influences diagnosis accuracy and decision making in simulated emergency medicine emergencies.

Authors:  Allistair Paul McRobert; Joe Causer; John Vassiliadis; Leonie Watterson; James Kwan; Mark A Williams
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 7.035

9.  Prepackaged central line kits reduce procedural mistakes during central line insertion: a randomized controlled prospective trial.

Authors:  Yelena Fenik; Nora Celebi; Robert Wagner; Christoph Nikendei; Frederike Lund; Stephan Zipfel; Reimer Riessen; Peter Weyrich
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Simulation-based multiprofessional obstetric anaesthesia training conducted in situ versus off-site leads to similar individual and team outcomes: a randomised educational trial.

Authors:  Jette Led Sørensen; Cees van der Vleuten; Susanne Rosthøj; Doris Østergaard; Vicki LeBlanc; Marianne Johansen; Kim Ekelund; Liis Starkopf; Jane Lindschou; Christian Gluud; Pia Weikop; Bent Ottesen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.