| Literature DB >> 35514487 |
Xinghuan Lin1, Shanshan Li1, Joonhoo Jung2, Wei Ma1, Lin Li1, Xuehong Ren1, Yuyu Sun2, Tung-Shi Huang3.
Abstract
In order to prepare multifunctional fibrous membranes with hydrophobicity, antibacterial properties and UV resistance, we used silica and titanium dioxide for preparing SiO2@TiO2 nanoparticles (SiO2@TiO2 NPs) to create roughness on the fibrous membranes surfaces. The introduction of TiO2 was used for improving UV resistance. N-Halamine precursor and silane precursor were introduced to modify SiO2@TiO2 NPs to synthesize SiO2@TiO2-based core@shell composite nanoparticles. The hydrophobic antibacterial fibrous membranes were prepared by a dip-pad process of electrospun biodegradable polyhydroxybutyrate/poly-ε-caprolactone (PHB/PCL) with the synthesized SiO2@TiO2-based core@shell composite nanoparticles. TEM, SEM and FT-IR were used to characterize the synthesized SiO2@TiO2-based core@shell composite nanoparticles and the hydrophobic antibacterial fibrous membranes. The fibrous membranes not only showed excellent hydrophobicity with an average water contact angle of 144° ± 1°, but also appreciable air permeability. The chlorinated fibrous membranes could inactivate all S. aureus and E. coli O157:H7 after 5 min and 60 min of contact, respectively. In addition, the chlorinated fibrous membranes exhibited outstanding cell compatibility with 102.1% of cell viability. Therefore, the prepared hydrophobic antibacterial degradable fibrous membranes may have great potential application for packaging materials. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35514487 PMCID: PMC9067281 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra04465e
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1TEM images of (A) SiO2 NPs, (B) SiO2@TiO2 NPs and (C) SiO2@TiO2-based core@shell composite nanoparticles; (D) FT-IR spectra of nanoparticles.
Fig. 2SEM images and diameters distribution of PHB/PCL (A and D), PHB/PCL–SiO2@TiO2–HDTMS/SPH (B and E) and PHB/PCL–SiO2@TiO2–HDTMS/SPH–Cl (C and F) fibrous membranes.
Fig. 3FT-IR spectra of PHB/PCL (a), PHB/PCL–SiO2@TiO2–HDTMS/SPH (b) and PHB/PCL–SiO2@TiO2–HDTMS/SPH–Cl (c) fibrous membranes.
Fig. 4TGA (A) and DTG (B) curves of the fibrous membranes.
Hydrophobicity and air permeability of fibrous membranes
| Samples (fibrous membranes) | Contact angle (°) | Air permeability (mm s−1) |
|---|---|---|
| PHB/PCL |
| 54.6 ± 2.6 |
| PHB/PCL–SiO2@TiO2–HDTMS/SPH |
| 44.8 ± 1.3 |
| PHB/PCL–SiO2@TiO2–HDTMS/SPH–Cl |
| 50.9 ± 1.7 |
Fig. 5Antibacterial efficacy of fibrous membranes against (A) S. aureus and (B) E. coli O157:H7.
Fig. 6Cell viability of rat skin fibroblasts on control and different fibrous membranes after 24 h incubation.
Fig. 7UVA light stability (A) and storage stability (B) of chlorinated PHB/PCL–SiO2@TiO2–HDTMS/SPH fibrous membranes.
Scheme 1Synthesis of SiO2@TiO2-based core@shell composite nanoparticles.