Literature DB >> 35513855

Individualised computerised cognitive training for community-dwelling people with mild cognitive impairment: study protocol of a completely virtual, randomised, controlled trial.

Stephanie Book1, Michael Jank2, Anna Pendergrass2, Elmar Graessel2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are at increased risk of converting to dementia. Cognitive training can improve the cognitive abilities of people with MCI. Computerised cognitive training (CCT) offers several advantages over traditional paper-and-pencil cognitive training and has the potential to be more individualised by matching task difficulty with individual performance. Recent systematic reviews have reported promising effects of CCT on improving the cognitive capacities of people with MCI. However, the quality of existing studies has been limited, and it is still unclear whether CCT can influence the progression to dementia. We developed an 'individualised' CCT (MAKSCog) specialised for people with MCI that automatically matches task difficulty with individual performance and an active control training ('basic' CCT). The aims of the present study are (a) to evaluate MAKSCog and (b) to investigate whether it can be applied to maintain the cognitive abilities of people with MCI.
METHODS: The present study investigates the effects of CCT on cognition in a randomised controlled intervention study in Germany. Participants are community-dwelling people with a psychometric diagnosis of MCI based on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini-Mental Status Test (MMSE). Screening and baseline testing are conducted via a videoconferencing assessment and telephone. Participants are randomly allocated. The treatment phase is 6 months with an open phase in which participants can freely decide to continue to use the CCTs. Additionally, both CCTs contain a monthly computerised cognitive assessment that measures different cognitive abilities: information processing speed, memory span, short term memory, and logical reasoning. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to investigate the effect of MAKSCog, an individualised CCT, specifically developed for people with different subtypes of MCI. A methodological strength is the double-blind, randomised, controlled design and the use of basic CCT as an active control group. The study is conducted entirely virtually with valid telehealth assessments for cognitive function. Methodological limitations might include a restriction to participants who feel comfortable with the use of technology and who own a computer, laptop, or tablet. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN ISRCTN14437015 . Prospectively registered on 27 February 2020.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community-dwelling; Computerised cognitive training; Mild cognitive impairment; Non-pharmacological intervention; Randomised controlled trial

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35513855      PMCID: PMC9069424          DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06152-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trials        ISSN: 1745-6215            Impact factor:   2.728


  43 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic and interventional implications of telemedicine in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: A literature review.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Costanzo; Chiara Arcidiacono; Alessandro Rodolico; Mariangela Panebianco; Eugenio Aguglia; Maria Salvina Signorelli
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.485

2.  Screening utility of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): in place of--or as well as--the MMSE?

Authors:  A J Larner
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.878

3.  Is three greater than five: the relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks.

Authors:  A Henik; J Tzelgov
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1982-07

4.  The reliability of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment using telehealth in a rural setting with veterans.

Authors:  Nathaniel DeYoung; Brian V Shenal
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 6.184

Review 5.  Cognitive Tests to Detect Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kelvin K F Tsoi; Joyce Y C Chan; Hoyee W Hirai; Samuel Y S Wong; Timothy C Y Kwok
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 6.  Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity.

Authors:  R C Petersen
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Non-Pharmacological Treatment in People With Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Melanie Straubmeier; Elisa-Marie Behrndt; Hildegard Seidl; Dominik Özbe; Katharina Luttenberger; Elmar Graessel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  Longer-Term Investigation of the Value of 18F-FDG-PET and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Predicting the Conversion of Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Inui; Kengo Ito; Takashi Kato
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.472

Review 9.  Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the detection of dementia in clinically unevaluated people aged 65 and over in community and primary care populations.

Authors:  Sam T Creavin; Susanna Wisniewski; Anna H Noel-Storr; Clare M Trevelyan; Thomas Hampton; Dane Rayment; Victoria M Thom; Kirsty J E Nash; Hosam Elhamoui; Rowena Milligan; Anish S Patel; Demitra V Tsivos; Tracey Wing; Emma Phillips; Sophie M Kellman; Hannah L Shackleton; Georgina F Singleton; Bethany E Neale; Martha E Watton; Sarah Cullum
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-13

Review 10.  Computerized cognitive training with older adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alexandra M Kueider; Jeanine M Parisi; Alden L Gross; George W Rebok
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.