Cecilia Closs1, Marianela Ackerman2, Walter Masson3, Martin Lobo4, Graciela Molinero4, Augusto Lavalle-Cobo4, Sophie Béliard5, Florian Mourre5, René Valéro5, Juan Patricio Nogueira6. 1. Centro Medico Melian, Av. 9 de Julio 243, CP: 3600, Formosa, Argentina. 2. Centro CIEN, Corrientes, Salta 1524, CP: 3400, Corrientes, Argentina. 3. Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Tte. Gral. Juan Domingo Perón 4190, CP:1199, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 4. Consejo de Epidemiologia y Prevención, Sociedad Argentina de Cardiología, Azcuénaga 980, CP: 1115, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 5. Aix Marseille Univ, APHM, INSERM, INRAE, C2VN, University Hospital La Conception, Department of Nutrition, Metabolic Diseases and Endocrinology, 147 Bd Baille, 13005, Marseille, France. 6. Centro de Investigación en Endocrinología, Nutrición y Metabolismo (CIENM), Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de Formosa, Av. Gutnisky 3200, 3600, Formosa, Argentina. nogueirajuanpatricio@gmail.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Obesity and its co-morbidities, including type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and dyslipidemia, are accompanied by excess cardiovascular morbi-mortality. Aside from excess low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), atherogenic dyslipidemia (AD), mainly characterized by elevated triglycerides and decreased high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, is often present in T2DM obese patients. Bariatric surgery, such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG), has become a reference treatment in that population. However, the respective effects of RYGB vs SG on lipid metabolism in T2DM patients have been rarely studied. METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, comparing the effects of RGYBG vs SG on lipid metabolism 12 months after surgery in T2DM patients, was performed. RESULTS: Four studies including a total of 298 patients (151 patients in the RYGB and 147 patients in the SG group) were examined. Despite a greater decrease in body mass index and greater improvement in glycemic control in RYGB compared to SG. RYGB vs SG was more effective in reducing total cholesterol, LDL-C, and non-HDL-C levels (mean difference [MD] -26.10 mg/dL, 95 % CI -38.88 to -13.50, p<0.00001; [MD] -20.10 mg/dL, 95 % CI -27.90 to -12.20, p<0.00001 and MD 31.90 mg/dl, 95 % CI -46.90 to -16.80, p<0.00001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The superiority of RYGB vs SG in reducing LDL-C, with an effect comparable to a moderate-intensity statin, suggests RYBG should be favored in hypercholesterolemic T2DM patients in order to further reduce cardiovascular risk.
INTRODUCTION: Obesity and its co-morbidities, including type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and dyslipidemia, are accompanied by excess cardiovascular morbi-mortality. Aside from excess low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), atherogenic dyslipidemia (AD), mainly characterized by elevated triglycerides and decreased high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, is often present in T2DM obese patients. Bariatric surgery, such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG), has become a reference treatment in that population. However, the respective effects of RYGB vs SG on lipid metabolism in T2DM patients have been rarely studied. METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, comparing the effects of RGYBG vs SG on lipid metabolism 12 months after surgery in T2DM patients, was performed. RESULTS: Four studies including a total of 298 patients (151 patients in the RYGB and 147 patients in the SG group) were examined. Despite a greater decrease in body mass index and greater improvement in glycemic control in RYGB compared to SG. RYGB vs SG was more effective in reducing total cholesterol, LDL-C, and non-HDL-C levels (mean difference [MD] -26.10 mg/dL, 95 % CI -38.88 to -13.50, p<0.00001; [MD] -20.10 mg/dL, 95 % CI -27.90 to -12.20, p<0.00001 and MD 31.90 mg/dl, 95 % CI -46.90 to -16.80, p<0.00001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The superiority of RYGB vs SG in reducing LDL-C, with an effect comparable to a moderate-intensity statin, suggests RYBG should be favored in hypercholesterolemic T2DM patients in order to further reduce cardiovascular risk.
Authors: Philip R Schauer; Sangeeta R Kashyap; Kathy Wolski; Stacy A Brethauer; John P Kirwan; Claire E Pothier; Susan Thomas; Beth Abood; Steven E Nissen; Deepak L Bhatt Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-03-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rinki Murphy; Michael G Clarke; Nicholas J Evennett; S John Robinson; M Lee Humphreys; Hisham Hammodat; Bronwen Jones; David D Kim; Richard Cutfield; Malcolm H Johnson; Lindsay D Plank; Michael W C Booth Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Victoria Ceperuelo-Mallafré; Gemma Llauradó; Noelia Keiran; Ester Benaiges; Brenno Astiarraga; Laia Martínez; Silvia Pellitero; Jose Miguel González-Clemente; Amaia Rodríguez; José Manuel Fernández-Real; Albert Lecube; Ana Megía; Nuria Vilarrasa; Joan Vendrell; Sonia Fernández-Veledo Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-07-21
Authors: Jan Borén; M John Chapman; Ronald M Krauss; Chris J Packard; Jacob F Bentzon; Christoph J Binder; Mat J Daemen; Linda L Demer; Robert A Hegele; Stephen J Nicholls; Børge G Nordestgaard; Gerald F Watts; Eric Bruckert; Sergio Fazio; Brian A Ference; Ian Graham; Jay D Horton; Ulf Landmesser; Ulrich Laufs; Luis Masana; Gerard Pasterkamp; Frederick J Raal; Kausik K Ray; Heribert Schunkert; Marja-Riitta Taskinen; Bart van de Sluis; Olov Wiklund; Lale Tokgozoglu; Alberico L Catapano; Henry N Ginsberg Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2020-06-21 Impact factor: 29.983