Literature DB >> 35512918

Patient-Level Analysis of Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Practice Versus Clinical Trials.

Daniel J Friedman1, Chengan Du2, Yongfei Wang3, Vratika Agarwal2, Paul D Varosy4, Frederick A Masoudi5, David R Holmes6, Vivek Y Reddy7, Matthew J Price8, Jeptha P Curtis3, James V Freeman9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare outcomes among patients from the PROTECT-AF (WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic PROTECTion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) and PREVAIL (Evaluation of the WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage [LAA] Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy) left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) trials with matched patients from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry LAAO Registry using patient-level data.
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing LAAO in clinical practice generally have more comorbidities than trial participants.
METHODS: Propensity-matched analyses, with up to 3 registry patients matched to each trial patient, were performed using Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray models.
RESULTS: A total of 1,904 registry patients were matched to 667 trial LAAO patients; 1,010 registry patients were matched to 348 warfarin patients. Compared with registry patients, trial LAAO patients experienced more pericardial effusion requiring intervention (3.8% vs 0.6%, P < 0.001), periprocedural ischemic stroke (0.9% vs 0.2%, P = 0.005), and failed device implantation (7.5% vs 3.6%, P < 0.001). The 425-day risk of ischemic stroke in trial LAAO patients was higher than in registry patients (2.70% vs 1.21%; HR: 1.951; P = 0.03); warfarin patients had comparable rates of ischemic stroke compared with registry patients (1.15% vs 1.29%; HR: 0.728; P = 0.57). Hemorrhagic stroke risk was similar among trial LAAO and registry patients (P = 0.88). Hemorrhagic stroke risk was greater among warfarin patients versus registry patients (1.44% vs 0.20%; HR: 5.871, P = 0.03). Mortality was lower in trial LAAO patients than in registry patients (2.92% vs 6.23%; HR: 0.477; P = 0.004), a difference attributable to noncardiovascular deaths. Mortality was similar (P = 0.44) among trial warfarin (4.48%) and registry (5.86%) patients.
CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, patients who meet trial criteria and undergo LAAO experience a lower risk of ischemic stroke, a similar risk of hemorrhagic stroke, and a higher risk of death after implant versus LAAO trial patients. (WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic PROTECTion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation [PROTECT-AF], NCT00129545; Evaluation of the WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage [LAA] Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy [PREVAIL], NCT01182441).
Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; clinical trials; left atrial appendage occlusion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35512918      PMCID: PMC9370831          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.02.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.075


  13 in total

1.  The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Data Quality Brief: the NCDR Data Quality Program in 2012.

Authors:  John C Messenger; Kalon K L Ho; Christopher H Young; Lara E Slattery; Jasmine C Draoui; Jeptha P Curtis; Gregory J Dehmer; Frederick L Grover; Michael J Mirro; Matthew R Reynolds; Ivan C Rokos; John A Spertus; Tracy Y Wang; Stuart A Winston; John S Rumsfeld; Frederick A Masoudi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Long-Term Safety and Efficacy in Continued Access Left Atrial Appendage Closure Registries.

Authors:  David R Holmes; Vivek Y Reddy; Nicole T Gordon; David Delurgio; Shephal K Doshi; Amish J Desai; James E Stone; Saibal Kar
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

Authors:  Srinivas R Dukkipati; Saibal Kar; David R Holmes; Shephal K Doshi; Vijendra Swarup; Douglas N Gibson; Brijeshwar Maini; Nicole T Gordon; Michael L Main; Vivek Y Reddy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Prospective randomized evaluation of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: the PREVAIL trial.

Authors:  David R Holmes; Saibal Kar; Matthew J Price; Brian Whisenant; Horst Sievert; Shephal K Doshi; Kenneth Huber; Vivek Y Reddy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Survival of patients receiving a primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in clinical practice vs clinical trials.

Authors:  Sana M Al-Khatib; Anne Hellkamp; Gust H Bardy; Stephen Hammill; W Jackson Hall; Daniel B Mark; Kevin J Anstrom; Jeptha Curtis; Hussein Al-Khalidi; Lesley H Curtis; Paul Heidenreich; Eric D Peterson; Gillian Sanders; Nancy Clapp-Channing; Kerry L Lee; Arthur J Moss
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  David R Holmes; Vivek Y Reddy; Zoltan G Turi; Shephal K Doshi; Horst Sievert; Maurice Buchbinder; Christopher M Mullin; Peter Sick
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: From the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Trials.

Authors:  Vivek Y Reddy; Shephal K Doshi; Saibal Kar; Douglas N Gibson; Matthew J Price; Kenneth Huber; Rodney P Horton; Maurice Buchbinder; Petr Neuzil; Nicole T Gordon; David R Holmes
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Efficacy and safety of left atrial appendage closure with WATCHMAN in patients with or without contraindication to oral anticoagulation: 1-Year follow-up outcome data of the EWOLUTION trial.

Authors:  Lucas V Boersma; Hueseyin Ince; Stephan Kische; Evgeny Pokushalov; Thomas Schmitz; Boris Schmidt; Tommaso Gori; Felix Meincke; Alexey Vladimir Protopopov; Timothy Betts; David Foley; Horst Sievert; Patrizio Mazzone; Tom De Potter; Elisa Vireca; Kenneth Stein; Martin W Bergmann
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 6.343

9.  The NCDR Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Registry.

Authors:  James V Freeman; Paul Varosy; Matthew J Price; David Slotwiner; Fred M Kusumoto; Chidambaram Rammohan; Clifford J Kavinsky; Zoltan G Turi; Joseph Akar; Cristina Koutras; Jeptha P Curtis; Frederick A Masoudi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Douglas S Lee; Jason P Fine
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.