Literature DB >> 35512091

Neo-sex chromosome evolution shapes sex-dependent asymmetrical introgression barrier.

Silu Wang1, Matthew J Nalley1, Kamalakar Chatla1, Reema Aldaimalani1, Ailene MacPherson2, Kevin H-C Wei1, Russell B Corbett-Detig3, Dat Mai1, Doris Bachtrog1.   

Abstract

Sex chromosomes play a special role in the evolution of reproductive barriers between species. Here we describe conflicting roles of nascent sex chromosomes on patterns of introgression in an experimental hybrid swarm. Drosophila nasuta and Drosophila albomicans are recently diverged, fully fertile sister species that have different sex chromosome systems. The fusion between an autosome (Muller CD) with the ancestral X and Y gave rise to neo-sex chromosomes in D. albomicans, while Muller CD remains unfused in D. nasuta. We found that a large block containing overlapping inversions on the neo-sex chromosome stood out as the strongest barrier to introgression. Intriguingly, the neo-sex chromosome introgression barrier is asymmetrical and sex-dependent. Female hybrids showed significant D. albomicans–biased introgression on Muller CD (neo-X excess), while males showed heterosis with excessive (neo-X, D. nasuta Muller CD) genotypes. We used a population genetic model to dissect the interplay of sex chromosome drive, heterospecific pairing incompatibility between the neo-sex chromosomes and unfused Muller CD, neo-Y disadvantage, and neo-X advantage in generating the observed sex chromosome genotypes in females and males. We show that moderate neo-Y disadvantage and D. albomicans specific meiotic drive are required to observe female-specific D. albomicans–biased introgression in this system, together with pairing incompatibility and neo-X advantage. In conclusion, this hybrid swarm between a young species pair sheds light onto the multifaceted roles of neo-sex chromosomes in a sex-dependent asymmetrical introgression barrier at a species boundary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Y degeneration; hybridization; inversion; meiotic drive; neo-sex chromosome

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35512091      PMCID: PMC9171612          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2119382119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  34 in total

1.  The speciation history of the Drosophila nasuta complex.

Authors:  Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 2.  Evaluating genomic signatures of "the large X-effect" during complex speciation.

Authors:  Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 3.  Sex chromosome repeats tip the balance towards speciation.

Authors:  Michael J O'Neill; Rachel J O'Neill
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Rapid and Predictable Evolution of Admixed Populations Between Two Drosophila Species Pairs.

Authors:  Daniel R Matute; Aaron A Comeault; Eric Earley; Antonio Serrato-Capuchina; David Peede; Anaïs Monroy-Eklund; Wen Huang; Corbin D Jones; Trudy F C Mackay; Jerry A Coyne
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Gene flow mediates the role of sex chromosome meiotic drive during complex speciation.

Authors:  Colin D Meiklejohn; Emily L Landeen; Kathleen E Gordon; Thomas Rzatkiewicz; Sarah B Kingan; Anthony J Geneva; Jeffrey P Vedanayagam; Christina A Muirhead; Daniel Garrigan; David L Stern; Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  The variant call format and VCFtools.

Authors:  Petr Danecek; Adam Auton; Goncalo Abecasis; Cornelis A Albers; Eric Banks; Mark A DePristo; Robert E Handsaker; Gerton Lunter; Gabor T Marth; Stephen T Sherry; Gilean McVean; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Sex ratio meiotic drive as a plausible evolutionary mechanism for hybrid male sterility.

Authors:  Linbin Zhang; Tianai Sun; Fitsum Woldesellassie; Hailian Xiao; Yun Tao
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Inexpensive multiplexed library preparation for megabase-sized genomes.

Authors:  Michael Baym; Sergey Kryazhimskiy; Tami D Lieberman; Hattie Chung; Michael M Desai; Roy Kishony
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Estimating ancestry and heterozygosity of hybrids using molecular markers.

Authors:  Benjamin M Fitzpatrick
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  High-resolution genome-wide dissection of the two rules of speciation in Drosophila.

Authors:  John P Masly; Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  1 in total

1.  Admixture of evolutionary rates across a butterfly hybrid zone.

Authors:  Tianzhu Xiong; Xueyan Li; Masaya Yago; James Mallet
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 8.713

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.