Literature DB >> 35511706

Influence of hempseed cake inclusion on growth performance, carcass characteristics, feeding behavior, and blood parameters in finishing heifers.

Thomas M Winders1, Eric M Serum2, David J Smith2, Bryan W Neville3, Golam K Mia1, Samat Amat4, Carl R Dahlen1, Kendall C Swanson1.   

Abstract

As the hemp industry continues to develop in the United States, there is an increasing interest in feeding byproducts of industrial hemp production to livestock. A completely randomized design experiment using crossbred finishing heifers (initial body weight [BW] ± SE = 494 ± 10 kg) was conducted to determine the effects of feeding hempseed cake in a corn-based finishing diet (10% forage) formulated to meet or exceed ruminally degradable and metabolizable protein requirements on growth performance, carcass characteristics, feeding behavior, and plasma parameters. Dietary treatments were the inclusion of 20% (dry matter [DM] basis) of dried corn distillers grains plus solubles (DDGS, n = 16) or hempseed cake (HEMP, n = 15). Cattle were housed in two pens, had ad libitum access to feed and water, and individual intakes and feeding behavior were monitored using the Insentec feeding system. Cattle were fed treatment diets for 111 d, and every 14 d BW were measured and blood samples were collected. Blood plasma was analyzed for glucose, urea nitrogen, and individual amino acids, and results were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis in SAS. Final BW, average daily gain, gain:feed, and hot carcass weight decreased (P ≤ 0.05) by 2.3%, 7.7%, 7.7%, and 2.6%, respectively, in heifers fed the HEMP diet than in heifers fed the DDGS diet. Net energy for maintenance and gain (Mcal/kg of feed, DM basis), estimated based on heifer intake and performance, were greater (P = 0.02) for the DDGS diet than for the HEMP diet. All other performance and carcass characteristics were not different (P ≥ 0.20) between treatments. Heifers fed the HEMP diet had greater (P < 0.05) plasma urea nitrogen concentration in samples from each collection day compared with heifers fed the DDGS diet, although there was a treatment-by-day interaction (P < 0.01) because of variability in the magnitude of treatment differences over time. Plasma glucose concentration was not influenced (P = 0.17) by dietary treatment. Plasma concentrations of total amino acids, nonessential amino acids, and essential amino acids were not different between treatments (P ≥ 0.09), although there were several interactions between treatment and day (P ≤ 0.04) for individual amino acids. These data suggest that hempseed cake has a lower net energy for maintenance and gain relative to DDGS when adequate metabolizable protein is supplied, while still providing adequate nutrition to support the acceptable performance of finishing cattle.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal performance; finishing cattle; hempseed cake; nutrition; plasma metabolites

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35511706      PMCID: PMC9169985          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.338


  19 in total

1.  Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia.

Authors:  A L CHANEY; E P MARBACH
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 2.  Measuring in vivo intracellular protein degradation rates in animal systems.

Authors:  W G Bergen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Electrospray Ionization Inlet Tandem Mass Spectrometry: A Hyphenated Method for the Sensitive Determination of Chemicals in Animal Tissues and Body Fluids.

Authors:  Shubhashis Chakrabarty; Weilin L Shelver; David J Smith
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Nutritional recommendations of feedlot consulting nutritionists: The 2015 New Mexico State and Texas Tech University survey.

Authors:  K L Samuelson; M E Hubbert; M L Galyean; C A Löest
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Influence of varying protein and starch degradabilities on performance of lactating cows.

Authors:  R Herrera-Saldana; J T Huber
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 6.  Central and peripheral cannabinoid receptors as therapeutic targets in the control of food intake and body weight.

Authors:  Stefan Engeli
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2012

7.  Effects of abomasal infusion of long-chain fatty acids on intake, feeding behavior and milk production in dairy cows.

Authors:  J A Benson; C K Reynolds; D J Humphries; S M Rutter; D E Beever
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Energy costs of feeding excess protein from corn-based by-products to finishing cattle.

Authors:  Jenny S Jennings; Beverly E Meyer; Pablo J Guiroy; N Andy Cole
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Dietary melatonin supplementation alters uteroplacental amino acid flux during intrauterine growth restriction in ewes.

Authors:  C O Lemley; L E Camacho; A M Meyer; M Kapphahn; J S Caton; K A Vonnahme
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of Temperature during Moist Heat Treatment on Ruminal Degradability and Intestinal Digestibility of Protein and Amino Acids in Hempseed Cake.

Authors:  L Karlsson; M Ruiz-Moreno; M D Stern; K Martinsson
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.509

View more
  1 in total

1.  Hempseed By-Product in Diets of Italian Simmental Cull Dairy Cows and Its Effects on Animal Performance and Meat Quality.

Authors:  Castro Ndong Ncogo Nchama; Carla Fabro; Mario Baldini; Elena Saccà; Vinicius Foletto; Edi Piasentier; Angela Sepulcri; Mirco Corazzin
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.231

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.