Literature DB >> 35511570

Pain, mental health, life satisfaction, and understanding from others in veterans with spinal cord injury.

Jack D K Watson1, Scott D McDonald1, Richard S Henry1, Mickeal Pugh1, Duygu Kuzu1, Paul B Perrin1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the relationships among pain, mental health symptom severity, life satisfaction, and understanding from others in veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI). RESEARCH METHOD/
DESIGN: A sample of 221 individuals with SCI were interviewed by a psychologist during their annual evaluation in a Veterans Affairs medical center in an urban Mid-Atlantic region. Participants completed single-item, Likert-scale measures of life satisfaction (McGuire Health Impact on Participation [M-HIP]), pain severity (M-HIP), and understanding of others (from a modified Appraisals of DisAbility Primary and Secondary Scale-Short Form [ADAPSS-sf]), along with the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), a measure of mental health symptom severity.
RESULTS: In linear regression models, pain (β = .29, p < .001) and understanding from others (β = -.28, p < .001) were significantly associated with mental health symptom severity with a marginally significant interaction effect (β = -.32, p = .099). Pain (β = -.33, p < .001) and understanding from others (β = .32, p < .001) were also significantly associated with life satisfaction; however, there was no significant interaction (β = .22, p = .234). CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS: This study showed that understanding from others and pain are important factors related to mental health and life satisfaction for veterans with SCI and highlights interventions targeting these relations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35511570      PMCID: PMC9353782          DOI: 10.1037/rep0000430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rehabil Psychol        ISSN: 0090-5550


  27 in total

Review 1.  Subjectifying quality of life as a medical rehabilitation outcome.

Authors:  M J Fuhrer
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2000-07-20       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 2.  Establishing prognosis and maximizing functional outcomes after spinal cord injury: a review of current and future directions in rehabilitation management.

Authors:  A S Burns; J F Ditunno
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Appraisals of DisAbility Primary and Secondary Scale-Short Form (ADAPSS-sf): Psychometrics and association with mental health among U.S. military veterans with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Scott D McDonald; Lisa D Goldberg-Looney; Melody N Mickens; Michael S Ellwood; Brian J Mutchler; Paul B Perrin
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2018-07-26

4.  An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: the PHQ-4.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke; Robert L Spitzer; Janet B W Williams; Bernd Löwe
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.386

5.  The 44th annual John Stanley Coulter Lecture. Measuring what matters: key rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  G G Whiteneck
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 6.  Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis.

Authors:  Faye Plummer; Laura Manea; Dominic Trepel; Dean McMillan
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.238

7.  Gender differences in depression among veterans with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Catherine S Wilson; Stephanie L Nassar; Lisa Ottomanelli; Scott D Barnett; Eni Njoh
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2018-05

8.  Functional outcomes and disability after nontraumatic spinal cord injury rehabilitation: Results from a retrospective study.

Authors:  Peter W New
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Survival after spinal cord injury in Australia.

Authors:  Peter J O'Connor
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: results from three large samples.

Authors:  Felix Cheung; Richard E Lucas
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.