Literature DB >> 35510158

First Identification of a Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas putida Co-Carrying Five β-Lactam Resistance Genes Recovered from a Urinary Tract Infection in China.

Danni Bao1,2, Linyao Huang3, Jianxin Yan3, Yexuzi Li4, Zhi Ruan2, Tian Jiang2,3.   

Abstract

The emergence of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas spp. in the clinical settings has heightened public awareness. Here, we described the genomic characteristics of a P. putida isolate co-carrying five β-lactam resistance genes recovered from a urinary tract infection in China. Whole-genome sequencing was performed using Illumina NovaSeq 6000 and Oxford Nanopore MinION platforms. The genome sequence was annotated and further subjected to identify the sequence type (ST), antibiotic resistance and virulence genes. Phylogenetic analysis of 193 P. putida strains stored in NCBI public database based on core genome single nucleotide polymorphism (cgSNP) strategy were also performed and visualized. Our study indicated that P. putida PP_2463 was resistant to a wide range of antimicrobial agents tested, including aminoglycosides, carbapenems and fluoroquinolones. The complete genome sequence of P. putida PP_2463 is made up of one chromosome and two plasmids, which could be assigned to a new sequence type (ST) 148. The co-occurrence of β-lactam resistance genes bla IPM-15, bla PME-1, bla CARB-2, and bla NDM-1 were first identified in P. putida, and a novel β-lactamase gene located in the chromosome were among the antimicrobial resistance genes discovered. The closest relative of P. putida PP_2463 was identified in 2012 from a urine sample in China, with a difference of 143 SNPs. Along with the presence of multiple β-lactamase genes and mobile genetic elements, the multidrug-resistant phenotype suggests a significant potential as an antibiotic resistance reservoir for Pseudomonas spp.
© 2022 Bao et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pseudomonas putida; blaCARB-2; blaIPM-15; blaNDM-5; blaPME-1; multidrug-resistance; urinary tract infection; whole genome sequencing

Year:  2022        PMID: 35510158      PMCID: PMC9059901          DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S366567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Drug Resist        ISSN: 1178-6973            Impact factor:   4.003


Introduction

In light of the high mortality rates associated with severe infections and the limited therapeutic treatment options available, the dissemination of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria has been a significant concern in hospital settings worldwide. Pseudomonas putida is a non-fermenting Gram-negative bacillus that causes bacteremia and sepsis in newborns, neutropenic patients, patients with cancer, as well as urinary tract infections (UTIs). P. putida can cause nosocomial infections in hospitalized patients and its high adaptability to challenging environmental conditions enables it to survive in different ecological environments.1 To date, several P. putida outbreaks have occurred in clinical settings, with some outbreaks being linked to the spread of contaminated water outlets.2–4 Although most P. putida are susceptible to a vast majority of antimicrobial agents, multidrug-resistant P. putida isolates harboring metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) genes and transposons have been identified already.5,6 Additionally, the horizontal transmission of antimicrobial resistance determinants between P. putida and P. aeruginosa constitutes a serious concern in clinical settings, although the definitive mechanisms remain largely undefined. In this study, we characterized the genomic features of a multidrug-resistant P. putida isolate co-carrying several β-lactamase gene, including blaPME-1, blaIMP-15, blaNDM-1, blaCARB-2 and a novel β-lactamase gene obtained from a urinary tract infection in China.

Materials and Methods

In March 2021, P. putida strain PP_2463 was recovered from the urine sample of a 65-year-old male patient with prostate cancer admitted to a tertiary hospital in Wenling, Zhejiang, China. The specimen was initially incubated overnight at 37°C on Columbia blood agar. Then, a single colony of the target strain was grown in Mueller Hinton broth overnight at 37°C (Oxoid Ltd, Basingstoke, UK). The strain was initially identified by VITEK 2 (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) and Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA), and then subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Antimicrobial agents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, Missouri, USA) and dissolved according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by DxM MicroScan WalkAway ID/AST system for the following antimicrobial agents: amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, piperacillin, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, cefazolin, cefuroxime, cefoxitin, aztreonam, imipenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2020 guidelines. The MICs of the 17 tested antibacterial agents are shown in Table 1. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as a quality control strain.
Table 1

Genotype and Phenotypic Resistance Profile of the P. Putida PP_2463

Antimicobial AgentsMIC (mg/L)SusceptibilityAntimicrobial Resistance Genes
Aminoglycosides
 Amikacin>32Raph(3’)-VIa, aph(6)-Id, aph(3”)-Ib, aadA2, rmtB, aph(3’)-XV, aadA11
 Gentamicin>8R
 Tobramycin>8R
β-lactams
 Piperacillin>64RblaPME-1blaNDM-1blaCARB-2blaIMP-15bla*
 Ticarcillin/clavulanic  acid>64R
 Piperacillin/tazobactam>64R
 Ceftazidime>16R
 Cefepime>16R
 Cefazolin>16R
 Cefuroxime>16R
 Cefoxitin>16R
 Aztreonam>16R
 Imipenem>8R
 Meropenem>8R
Fluoroquinolones
 Ciprofloxacin>2RqnrVC1
 Levofloxacin>4R

Note: *Novel β-lactamase gene.

Abbreviation: MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration.

Genotype and Phenotypic Resistance Profile of the P. Putida PP_2463 Note: *Novel β-lactamase gene. Abbreviation: MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration. A Genomic DNA Purification Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) was used to extract genomic DNA from the isolate and NanoDropTM spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to assess the purity and concentration of DNA. Whole genome shotgun sequencing of P. putida PP_2463 was undertaken using both short-read Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and long-read Oxford Nanopore MinION (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) platforms to study the mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance. Unicycler 0.4.8 was used to accomplish hybrid assembly of Illumina and Nanopore sequence reads.7 The genome sequence was automatically annotated by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genomes Annotation Pipeline (PGAP). In silico multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis was performed by PubMLST database.8,9 ABRicate 1.0.1 was used in conjunction with ResFinder 4.1 and CARD 2020 to identify the antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in the genome.10,11 IslandViewer 4, ISfinder 1.0, PHASTER 2016, CRISPRCasFinder 1.0, and antiSMASH 5.2.0 were used to predict genomic islands, insertion sequence (IS) elements, prophage sequences, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) sequences, and secondary metabolite gene clusters, respectively.12–16 Genomic sequences and the associated metadata of 192 P. putida strains stored in NCBI GenBank database were obtained. The bacterial core genome single nucleotide polymorphism (cgSNP) analysis between P. putida PP_2463 and 192 complete or draft genomic sequences of P. putida strains were determined to construct a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree using CSI Phylogeny 1.4.17 This analysis was performed using the default parameters and P. putida NBRC 14164 (RefSeq ID: NC_021505.1) as the reference genome. SNP distance matrixes were calculated using SNP-dists. Phylogenetic tree were visualized and annotated by Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) V5 web server.18 Easyfig was used to analyse genetic context of the antimicrobial resistance genes identified in P. putida PP_2463.19

Results and Discussion

The complete genome sequence of P. putida PP_2463 is made up of three contigs totaling 5,561,304 bp. The strain’s overall G+C content was 62.5%, and a total of 5129 coding sequences (CDSs), 100 RNAs (74 tRNA, 22 rRNA, and 4 ncRNA) genes were found. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that the isolate was resistant to all tested antimicrobial agents, including aminoglycosides, β-lactams, and fluoroquinolones (Table 1). The resistome of P. putida PP_2463 is made up of several genes that are responsible for resistance to β-lactams (blaPME-1, blaIPM-15, blaCARB-2, blaNDM-1 and a novel β-lactamase gene), tetracyclines [tet(G)], aminoglycosides [aadA2, aadA11, aph(3’)-VIa, aph(6)-Id, aph(3”)-Ib, rmtB and aph(3’)-XV], fluoroquinolones (qnrVc1) and sulphonamide (sul1) (Table 1). The multidrug resistance phenotype to aminoglycosides, third-generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, quinolones and tetracyclines was adequately explained by these findings. Interestingly, all the antimicrobial resistant genes were located in the chromosome (contig 1) and three resistance gene clusters were formed (Figure 1). The first cluster contained the blaNDM-5 gene, two copies of blaPME-1, and a novel β-lactamase gene. Analysis of the genetic environment revealed that IS91 and IS5 exists upstream and downstream of β-lactam resistance genes as a truncated fragment. The genetic environment of the second cluster revealed that intl1 and Tn3 lies downstream of blaCARB-2, while the aadA, folP, and floR2 genes are located upstream of the blaCARB-2 gene. Besides, the second cluster also carried the aph(6)-Id, aph(3”)-Ib, aadA2, sul1 and tet(G) genes. The third cluster carried several β-lactam resistance genes, including blaCARB-2, blaIMP-15 and other resistance genes, including rmtB, tet(G), aph(3’)-XV, dfrA27, aph(6)-Id, aph(3”)-Ib, sul1, aadA11, and qnrVC1. There are at least 65 genomic islands and multiple IS elements in the genome of P. putida PP_2463, and the majority of them belong to the IS3, IS5, and IS66 families. Besides, a total of 10 prophages and just one CRISPR sequence can be predicted. Interestingly, we found a new β-lactamase gene (NCBI accession number OM585599) that has not even been named yet, and to our knowledge the co-occurrence of blaPME-1, blaIPM-15 and blaNDM-1 genes was also firstly identified in P. putida.
Figure 1

Genetic environment of three clusters of the β-lactam resistance genes in P. putida PP_2463. The red arrows represent the β-lactam resistance genes, the green arrow represents the novel β-lactamase gene discovered in this study, whereas the orange arrows represent additional coding sequences (CDSs).

Genetic environment of three clusters of the β-lactam resistance genes in P. putida PP_2463. The red arrows represent the β-lactam resistance genes, the green arrow represents the novel β-lactamase gene discovered in this study, whereas the orange arrows represent additional coding sequences (CDSs). In silico MLST analysis indicated that P. putida PP_2463 represent a novel sequence type, which has been assigned to ST148 after we submitted to the PubMLST database and curated. The phylogenetic connections between P. putida PP_2463 and a total of 192 P. putida strains currently deposited in the NCBI GenBank database were examined to evaluate the genomic epidemiological features of P. putida strains in a global context (Figure 2A). The 193 strains of P. putida in this study were recovered from various hosts, including human (n = 32, 16.5%), plant (n = 21, 10.8%), animal (n = 4, 2.0%) and other unknown resources (n = 136, 70.4%). The isolation dates ranged from 1977 to 2021, but most isolates were obtained between 2011 and 2021 (55.9%, n = 108). Europe (25.3%, n = 49) is the main separation continent, followed by Asia (24.3%, n = 47), North America (20.2%, n = 39), Africa (5.6%, n = 11), Antarctica (1%, n = 2), Oceania (1.0%, n = 2), South America (0.5%, n = 1). According to the results of phylogenetic analysis, the closest relative of P. putida PP_2463 was identified in 2012 from a urine sample in Sanya, China, with just 143 SNPs difference. Interestingly, after we submitted the genome sequence to NCBI for annotation, the curator used P. juntendi as the organism’s name for this genome due to a higher level of similarity according to the current taxonomic nomenclature. We then further performed the average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis of P. putida PP_2463 with the genome sequence of the type strains of P. putida and P. juntendi. The ANI results revealed that the genome of P. putida PP_2463 is > 99.9% identical to the type strain of both species. P. juntendi was a novel species firstly identified in hospital patients in Japan and Myanmar in 2019,20 which is close to several species in the genus of Pseudomonas, including P. putida. Therefore, we also investigated the genomic epidemiological features of the currently available P. juntendi strains in a global context (Figure 2B). The closest relative of P. putida PP_2463, obtained from a blood sample in Brazil in 2010, with 10,607 SNPs difference. Ribosomal Multilocus Sequence Typing (rMLST) analysis also showed that P. putida PP_2463 could be identified as P. putida or P. juntendi with equal confidence score.
Figure 2

(A) The phylogenetic relationship between P. putida PP_2463 and a total of 192 P. putida strains currently deposited in the NCBI GenBank database. (B) The phylogenetic relationship between P. putida PP_2463 and a total of 12 P. juntendi strains currently available in the NCBI GenBank database. The distance of SNPs is represented by the branch length. The positions corresponding to the three circles represent the continent, host and the isolation date, respectively.

(A) The phylogenetic relationship between P. putida PP_2463 and a total of 192 P. putida strains currently deposited in the NCBI GenBank database. (B) The phylogenetic relationship between P. putida PP_2463 and a total of 12 P. juntendi strains currently available in the NCBI GenBank database. The distance of SNPs is represented by the branch length. The positions corresponding to the three circles represent the continent, host and the isolation date, respectively.

Conclusion

In summary, we firstly reported a ST148 P. putida strain in China that carrying multiple chromosome-borne blaPME-1, blaIPM-15, blaCARB-2, blaNDM-1 and a novel β-lactamase genes. The prevalence of P. putida isolates carrying β-lactamase resistance determinants raises major concerns, emphasizing the critical need for alternate antibiotic therapy and continuing active surveillance. These findings will shed new light on the genomic epidemiological characteristics and the global transmission dynamics of P. putida and demonstrates its superior capacity for acquiring and maintaining foreign resistance determinants.
  20 in total

1.  Pseudomonas juntendi sp. nov., isolated from patients in Japan and Myanmar.

Authors:  Mari Tohya; Shin Watanabe; Kanae Teramoto; Masahiro Shimojima; Tatsuya Tada; Kyoko Kuwahara-Arai; May Wint War; San Mya; Htay Htay Tin; Teruo Kirikae
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.747

2.  Mechanisms of resistance to fluoroquinolones and carbapenems in Pseudomonas putida.

Authors:  Toshinobu Horii; Hideaki Muramatsu; Yoshitsugu Iinuma
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas putida outbreak associated with contaminated water outlets in an oncohaematology paediatric unit.

Authors:  C Aumeran; C Paillard; F Robin; J Kanold; O Baud; R Bonnet; B Souweine; O Traore
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Genetic characterisation of antibiotic resistance transposons Tn6608 and Tn6609 isolated from clinical Pseudomonas strains in Cyprus.

Authors:  Vaheesan Rajabal; Ferdiye Taner; Tamer Sanlidag; Kaya Suer; Emrah Guler; Murat Sayan; Steve Petrovski
Journal:  J Glob Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation.

Authors:  Ivica Letunic; Peer Bork
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Solving the problem of comparing whole bacterial genomes across different sequencing platforms.

Authors:  Rolf S Kaas; Pimlapas Leekitcharoenphon; Frank M Aarestrup; Ole Lund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  IslandViewer 4: expanded prediction of genomic islands for larger-scale datasets.

Authors:  Claire Bertelli; Matthew R Laird; Kelly P Williams; Britney Y Lau; Gemma Hoad; Geoffrey L Winsor; Fiona S L Brinkman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads.

Authors:  Ryan R Wick; Louise M Judd; Claire L Gorrie; Kathryn E Holt
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates search for Cas proteins.

Authors:  David Couvin; Aude Bernheim; Claire Toffano-Nioche; Marie Touchon; Juraj Michalik; Bertrand Néron; Eduardo P C Rocha; Gilles Vergnaud; Daniel Gautheret; Christine Pourcel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  BacWGSTdb 2.0: a one-stop repository for bacterial whole-genome sequence typing and source tracking.

Authors:  Ye Feng; Shengmei Zou; Hangfei Chen; Yunsong Yu; Zhi Ruan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.