Literature DB >> 35509302

A retrospective audit of the timescales involved in the diagnosis and management of suspected Achilles tendon ruptures at a single National Health Service trust: A quality service improvement and redesign project.

C J Williams1, S Hodkinson1, K Chandrasekaran1, T Koc1, I Gibb1, C Dando2, C Bowen2, J Oakley3.   

Abstract

Introduction: The Achilles tendon is the most frequently ruptured tendon. Prompt diagnosis of this injury ensures optimal management decisions are instituted early ensuring the best outcome and patient experience, at minimal cost to the United Kingdom National Health Service. Despite this, regional and national variations to diagnosis and management exist, with anecdotal evidence of inefficiencies in the local patient pathway. To explore this further, a retrospective departmental audit of timescales from presentation to ultrasound diagnosis and definitive treatment decision was undertaken.
Methods: All suspected Achilles tendon ruptures in 2018 were identified through electronic and written patient records, and information on timescales involved in the diagnosis and management of each compiled. Descriptive statistics were used to map each step of the pathway and timescales involved, with performance assessed against local departmental standards and the Swansea Morriston Achilles Rupture Treatment (SMART) protocol.
Results: In total, 119 patients were identified, of which 113 received an ultrasound examination. Local departmental standards were met in the majority of cases, with 78% (n = 88) diagnosed by ultrasound within one week of the request and 83% (n = 91) given a treatment decision within two weeks of presentation. However, this was suboptimal when compared with timeframes utilised for developing the SMART protocol, with only 7% (n = 8) scanned within 48 hours of presentation. Conclusions: Key areas of the patient pathway were identified for quality service improvement and redesign, with multidisciplinary discussion resulting in the development of a revised patient pathway which expedites diagnosis and treatment for these injuries.
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Swansea Morriston Achilles Rupture Treatment protocol; Treatment; quality service improvement and redesign; ultrasound

Year:  2021        PMID: 35509302      PMCID: PMC9058383          DOI: 10.1177/1742271X211023800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  13 in total

1.  Achilles tendon rupture: a challenging diagnosis.

Authors:  J R Gravlee; R L Hatch; A M Galea
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

2.  Repair of defects in the tendo achillis.

Authors:  D M BOSWORTH
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1956-01       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Achilles tendon rupture: how to avoid missing the diagnosis.

Authors:  Robert P R Boyd; Richard Dimock; Matthew C Solan; Edward Porter
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Ruptures of the tendo achillis. An objective assessment of surgical and non-surgical treatment.

Authors:  A E Inglis; W N Scott; T P Sculco; A H Patterson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  US in mid-portion Achilles tendon injury.

Authors:  Andrea Gervasio; Paola Bollani; Aurelio Biasio
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2013-06-21

6.  The treatment of a rupture of the Achilles tendon using a dedicated management programme.

Authors:  A M Hutchison; C Topliss; D Beard; R M Evans; P Williams
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Surgical Strategy for the Chronic Achilles Tendon Rupture.

Authors:  Yangjing Lin; Liu Yang; Li Yin; Xiaojun Duan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  The Importance of Physical Activity Exercise among Older People.

Authors:  Birgitta Langhammer; Astrid Bergland; Elisabeth Rydwik
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture.

Authors:  Seung-Hwan Park; Ho Seong Lee; Ki Won Young; Sang Gyo Seo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-02-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.