| Literature DB >> 35507262 |
Rita Casadio1, Castrense Savojardo2, Piero Fariselli3, Emidio Capriotti2, Pier Luigi Martelli2.
Abstract
After nearly two decades of research in the field of computational methods based on machine learning and knowledge-based potentials for ΔG and ΔΔG prediction upon variations, we now realize that all the approaches are poorly performing when tested on specific cases and that there is large space for improvement. Why this is so? Is it wrong the underlying assumption that experimental protein thermodynamics in solution reflects the thermodynamics of a single protein? Both machine learning and knowledge-based computational methods are rigorous and we know the solid theory behind. We are now in a critical situation, which suggests that predictions of protein instability upon variation should be considered with care. In the following, we will show how to cope with the problem of understanding which protein positions may be of interest for biotechnological and biomedical purposes. By applying a consensus procedure, we indicate possible strategies for the result interpretation.Entities:
Keywords: Benchmarking ΔΔG prediction; CAGI experiment; Frataxin instability; Machine learning; Protein instability; ΔG prediction; ΔΔG prediction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35507262 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2095-3_6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Methods Mol Biol ISSN: 1064-3745