Literature DB >> 35507262

Turning Failures into Applications: The Problem of Protein ΔΔG Prediction.

Rita Casadio1, Castrense Savojardo2, Piero Fariselli3, Emidio Capriotti2, Pier Luigi Martelli2.   

Abstract

After nearly two decades of research in the field of computational methods based on machine learning and knowledge-based potentials for ΔG and ΔΔG prediction upon variations, we now realize that all the approaches are poorly performing when tested on specific cases and that there is large space for improvement. Why this is so? Is it wrong the underlying assumption that experimental protein thermodynamics in solution reflects the thermodynamics of a single protein? Both machine learning and knowledge-based computational methods are rigorous and we know the solid theory behind. We are now in a critical situation, which suggests that predictions of protein instability upon variation should be considered with care. In the following, we will show how to cope with the problem of understanding which protein positions may be of interest for biotechnological and biomedical purposes. By applying a consensus procedure, we indicate possible strategies for the result interpretation.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benchmarking ΔΔG prediction; CAGI experiment; Frataxin instability; Machine learning; Protein instability; ΔG prediction; ΔΔG prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35507262     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2095-3_6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  33 in total

Review 1.  Dominant forces in protein folding.

Authors:  K A Dill
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1990-08-07       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  K-Fold: a tool for the prediction of the protein folding kinetic order and rate.

Authors:  E Capriotti; R Casadio
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Protein stability engineering insights revealed by domain-wide comprehensive mutagenesis.

Authors:  Alex Nisthal; Connie Y Wang; Marie L Ary; Stephen L Mayo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Predicting free energy contributions to the conformational stability of folded proteins from the residue sequence with radial basis function networks.

Authors:  R Casadio; M Compiani; P Fariselli; F Vivarelli
Journal:  Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol       Date:  1995

5.  SCooP: an accurate and fast predictor of protein stability curves as a function of temperature.

Authors:  Fabrizio Pucci; Jean Marc Kwasigroch; Marianne Rooman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  On the effect of protein conformation diversity in discriminating among neutral and disease related single amino acid substitutions.

Authors:  Ezequiel Juritz; Maria Silvina Fornasari; Pier Luigi Martelli; Piero Fariselli; Rita Casadio; Gustavo Parisi
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Analysis of Large-Scale Mutagenesis Data To Assess the Impact of Single Amino Acid Substitutions.

Authors:  Vanessa E Gray; Ronald J Hause; Douglas M Fowler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Evaluating Protein Engineering Thermostability Prediction Tools Using an Independently Generated Dataset.

Authors:  Peishan Huang; Simon K S Chu; Henrique N Frizzo; Morgan P Connolly; Ryan W Caster; Justin B Siegel
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-03-20

9.  A base measure of precision for protein stability predictors: structural sensitivity.

Authors:  Octav Caldararu; Tom L Blundell; Kasper P Kepp
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  Structural heterogeneity and precision of implications drawn from cryo-electron microscopy structures: SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein mutations as a test case.

Authors:  Rukmankesh Mehra; Kasper P Kepp
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 2.095

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.