| Literature DB >> 35505298 |
Jamilu E Ssenku1, Abdul Walusansa1,2,3, Hannington Oryem-Origa1, Paul Ssemanda1,4, Saidi Ntambi1, Francis Omujal5, Abubakar Sadik Mustafa6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oil spills are ranked among the greatest global challenges to humanity. In Uganda, owing to the forthcoming full-scale production of multi-billion barrels of oil, the country's oil pollution burden is anticipated to escalate, necessitating remediation. Due to the unsuitability of several oil clean-up technologies, the search for cost-effective and environmentally friendly remediation technologies is paramount. We thus carried out this study to examine the occurrence of metabolically active indigenous bacterial species and chemical characteristics of soils with a long history of oil pollution in Uganda that can be used in the development of a bacterial-based product for remediation of oil-polluted sites.Entities:
Keywords: BIOLOG EcoPlate™; Bacterial profiles; Bioremediation; Chemical profiles; Garages; Hydrocarbons; Industries; Oil-pollution
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35505298 PMCID: PMC9063239 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-022-02541-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 4.465
Fig. 1Location of the study sites
Chemical characteristics (median and range values) of soils samples collected from the three cities
| Parameter | Site | Kampala city | Jinja city | Hoima city | Study ranges | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil-polluted soil | Control | Oil-polluted soil | Control | Oil-polluted soil | Control | Oil-polluted soil | Control | ||
| pH | Garage | 6.9 | 6.3 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.5 | 6.8 | 6.1-7.9 | 6.1-7.1 |
| Industry | 7.9 | 6.3 | 7.0 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 5.3-7.3 | 6.1-7.1 | |
| Organic content (%) | Garage | 25.5 | 4.50 | 26.9 | 4.20 | 20.3 | 3.50 | 14.0-43.8 | 1.6-6.0 |
| Industry | 23.1 | 4.50 | 19.3 | 4.20 | 20.9 | 3.50 | 5.7-36.0 | 1.6-6.0 | |
| Nitrogen (%) | Garage | 0.34 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.19 | 0.49 | 0.19 | 0.13 − 0.70 | 0.03 − 0.35 |
| Industry | 0.22 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.19 | 0.34 | 0.19 | 0.08 − 0.60 | 0.03 − 0.35 | |
| Phosphorus (%) | Garage | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.17 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.06-0.88 | 0.01-0.33 |
| Industry | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.05-0.98 | 0.01-0.33 | |
| Zinc (mg/kg) | Garage | 46.7 | 17.1 | 46.2 | 31.7 | 35.9 | 3.2 | 27.4-49.7 | 2.5-42.2 |
| Industry | 24.8 | 17.1 | 36.9 | 31.7 | 37.4 | 3.2 | 6.4-48.6 | 2.5-42.2 | |
| Chromium (mg/kg) | Garage | 19.1 | 9.6 | 17.8 | 17.3 | 16.5 | 8.5 | 7.5-30.4 | 4.6-25.5 |
| Industry | 12.8 | 9.6 | 13.0 | 17.3 | 15.3 | 8.5 | 9.0-29.6 | 4.6-25.5 | |
| Manganese (mg/kg) | Garage | 18.3 | 14.6 | 22.1 | 30.6 | 11.6 | 6.1 | 7.5-32.6 | 0.2-58.5 |
| Industry | 9.8 | 14.6 | 25.5 | 30.6 | 13.7 | 6.1 | 5.0-50.3 | 0.2-58.5 | |
| Nickel (mg/kg) | Garage | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.75 | 1.57 | 0.37 | 0.14 | 0.12-2.25 | 0.03-3.3 |
| Industry | 0.26 | 0.43 | 0.57 | 1.57 | 0.31 | 0.14 | 0.13-2.01 | 0.03-3.3 | |
| Lead (mg/kg) | Garage | 1.51 | 0.31 | 2.01 | 1.99 | 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.06-3.99 | 0.04-4.01 |
| Industry | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.27 | 1.99 | 0.26 | 0.07 | 0.05-3.38 | 0.04-4.01 | |
Fig. 2Most abundant hydrocarbons in soil samples collected from the three cities and sites
Fig. 3Bacterial species richness (A), bacterial species diversity (B) and bacterial activity (C) of the soil samples collected from the three cities. Means for each site for a particular city, with different letters of the alphabet are significantly different (Tukey’s test, p < 0.05)
Fig. 4Principal component analysis biplots for oil-polluted and control soils collected from the three cities (KI, Kampala industry; KG, Kampala garage; KX, Kampala control; HI, Hoima industry; HG, Hoima garage; HX, Hoima control; JI, Jinja industry; JG, Jinja garage; JX, Jinja control)
Correlation between heavy metal content and bacterial profiles (Spearman’s, n = 27)
| Profiles | pH | OC | N | P | Zn | Cr | Mn | Ni | Pb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.07NS | 0.52** | 0.33NS | 0.27NS | 0.59** | 0.30NS | 0.25NS | 0.07NS | 0.36NS | |
| S | 0.13NS | 0.51** | 0.25NS | 0.19NS | 0.56** | 0.29NS | -0.01NS | -0.19NS | 0.18NS |
| AWCD | -0.02NS | 0.61** | 0.47* | 0.28NS | 0.71*** | 0.29NS | 0.13NS | -0.15NS | 0.33NS |
Species diversity (H), Species richness (S), Bacterial activity (AWCD), p ≤ 0.05*, p ≤ 0.01**, p ≤ 0.001***, NS – Not significant
The correlations between the bacterial community profiles and the hydrocarbons were largely positively correlated apart from the correlations with Benzo(k) fluoranthene (Bl), Benzo(a) pyrene (Bp) and Benzo(g,h,i) perylene (Be) (Table 3). Positive correlations between bacterial community profiles and Naphthalene, Acenaphthene, Fluorathnthene and Indeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene were all significant. For Acenaphthylene and Phenanthrene, they were only significant for AWCD while for Fluorene and Pyrene, they were significant for both S and AWCD and Dibenz(a,h) anthracene for only H. On the other hand, the negative correlations were only not significant for S and Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Correlation between the abundant hydrocarbons and bacterial profiles (Spearman’s, n = 27)
| Profiles | Na | Ac | Ae | Fl | Ph | An | Fu | Py | Ch | Bf | Bl | Bp | Da | Ip | Be |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.46* | 0.38NS | 0.66** | 0.36NS | 0.39NS | 0.26NS | 0.47* | 0.37NS | 0.30NS | 0.45NS | −0.63*** | −0.59** | 0.49* | 0.60** | −0.49* | |
| 0.45* | 0.40NS | 0.70** | 0.39* | 0.39NS | 0.23NS | 0.43* | 0.52* | 0.45NS | 0.60NS | −0.50** | −0.48* | 0.46NS | 0.48* | −0.34NS | |
| 0.50** | 0.49* | 0.64* | 0.49* | 0.41* | 0.30NS | 0.51** | 0.53* | 0.39NS | 0.62NS | −0.47* | − 0.43* | 0.44NS | 0.65** | −0.50** |
Species diversity (H), Species richness (S), Bacterial activity (AWCD), p ≤ 0.05*, p ≤ 0.01**, p ≤ 0.001***, NS – Not significant, Naphthalene (Na), Acenaphthylene (Ac), Acenaphthene (Ae), Fluorene (Fl), Phenanthrene (Ph), Anthracene (An), Fluorathnthene (Fu), Pyrene (Py), Chrysene (Ch), Benzo(b) fluoranthene (Bf), Benzo(k) fluoranthene (Bl), Benzo(a) pyrene (Bp), Dibenz(a,h) anthracene (Da), Indeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene (Ip), Benzo(g,h,i) perylene (Be)