| Literature DB >> 35505174 |
Haiqing Song1, Yuan Wang1, Qingfeng Ma1, Huisheng Chen2, Bo Liu3, Yi Yang4, Jianguo Zhu5, Shigang Zhao6, Xiaoping Jin7, Yongqiu Li8, Yanyong Wang9, Runxiu Zhu10, Liandong Zhao11, Junyan Liu12, Qilin Ma13, Yongzhong Lin14, Xiangyang Tian15, Qing Zhang16, Weidong Zhou17, Yongbo Zhang18, Jie Zhou19, Yansong Li20, Zhi Song21, Wuwei Feng22, Rui Liu23, Xunming Ji24, Yuping Wang25.
Abstract
Recombinant human prourokinase (rhPro-UK) is a novel thrombolytic that has been approved to treat patients with acute myocardial infarction. However, the safety and efficacy of intravenous rhPro-UK in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has not been well established. We aimed to investigate the safety and preliminary efficacy of rhPro-UK in patients with AIS in a multi-center phase IIa trial setting. One hundred nineteen patients within 4.5 h of AIS onset were enrolled in this randomized, open-label, 23-center phase IIa clinical trial. Patients were randomly assigned to 35 mg (n = 40) or 50 mg (n = 39) intravenous rhPro-UK or 0.9 mg/kg recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA; n = 40). The primary endpoint was functional independence defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0 or 1 at 90 days. The secondary outcome was early neurological improvement defined as a reduction of ≥ 4 points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score from baseline to 24 h after drug administration. Safety endpoints included death due to any cause, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and other serious adverse events (SAEs). The proportion of patients with an mRS score of ≤ 1 at 90 days did not differ significantly among three groups (35 mg rhPro-UK: 55.56% vs. 50 mg rhPro-UK: 57.89% vs. vs. r-tPA: 52.63%; P = 0.92). The rates of treatment response, referring to early neurological improvement, were similar among these three groups (36.11% vs. 31.58% vs. 28.95%, respectively; P = 0.85). There was no difference in mortality at 90 days or in the rate of other SAEs among the three groups. One patient in the 50 mg rhPro-UK group suffered sICH. While neither the primary efficacy outcomes nor safety profile differed significantly among the low, high rhPro-UK and control groups, it is a logical step to further test the low-dose rhPro-UK group versus the control group in a well-powered phase III study.Trial Registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn . Identifier: ChiCTR1800016519. Date of registration: June 6 2018.Entities:
Keywords: Acute ischemic stroke; Early neurological improvement; Efficacy; Recombinant human prourokinase; Safety; Thrombolytic therapy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35505174 DOI: 10.1007/s12975-022-01012-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Stroke Res ISSN: 1868-4483 Impact factor: 6.829