Literature DB >> 35504784

Differences in clinical outcomes of COVID-19 among vaccinated and unvaccinated kidney transplant recipients.

Erol Demir1, Hamad Dheir2, Seda Safak3, Ayse Serra Artan4, Savas Sipahi5, Aydin Turkmen6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The remarkable efficacy and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines have been described in healthy individuals, but kidney transplant recipients have been excluded from these studies. Therefore, real-world evidence of these vaccines can guide clinicians in predicting complications in kidney transplant recipients and how many doses of vaccines are protective. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 vaccines on kidney transplant recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: This matched case-control study included vaccinated kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 from two centers between 1 May and 1 October 2021. All patients in the vaccinated group received a minimum of two doses of the vaccine and were diagnosed with COVID-19 at least one month after the last dose. Each vaccinated patient was matched with an unvaccinated kidney transplant recipient diagnosed with COVID. The endpoints were all-cause mortality, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, acute kidney injury, cytokine storm, and acute respiratory distress syndrome.
RESULTS: The median age of vaccinated seventy-two participants was 45 years, and 41 of the participants were men in the vaccinated group. Four patients in the vaccinated group and nine patients in the control group died during follow-up (p = 0.247). Seventeen patients in the vaccinated group, thirty-four participants in the control group were hospitalized (p = 0.004); five vaccinated patients and ten unvaccinated patients were followed-up in the ICU during follow-up (p = 0.168). Thirteen of the vaccinated and twelve unvaccinated patients developed acute kidney injury (p = 0.16). The occurrence of cytokine storm (n = 4 vs. n = 11; p = 0.061) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (n = 5 vs. n = 10; p = 0.168) was higher in the patient group compared to the control group.
CONCLUSION: COVID-19 remains a fatal disease despite advancing treatment modalities and preventive strategies. COVID-19 vaccines can't prevent death in all kidney transplant recipients, but they decrease hospitalization rate and duration in most patients.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BNT162b2; COVID-19; CoronaVac; Kidney transplantation; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccine effectiveness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35504784      PMCID: PMC9042733          DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   4.169


Introduction

Kidney transplant recipients face high mortality rates, allograft damage, acute respiratory syndrome, and cytokine storm during Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [1], [2], [3]. Although there are treatment options for COVID-19, there is no cure yet. The remarkable efficacy and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines have been described in healthy individuals, but kidney transplant recipients have been excluded from these studies [4]. Therefore, most recommendations for kidney transplant recipients are based on measurements of immune responses to vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). On the other hand, the correlation between the immune response and the clinic effect has been demonstrated in healthy individuals, but this effect wasn't confirmed in immunocompromised patients yet [5], [6], [7]. There is an ongoing debate about the number of doses and timing of the COVID-19 vaccine schedule in kidney transplant recipients. Two doses were recommended early in the pandemic, and guidelines were later revised to three doses of the vaccine (two doses plus a booster dose). Due to efficacy and effectiveness concerns, four (additional plus booster) doses were recommended recently [7], [8]. Despite all the improvements in treatment modalities and vaccination for COVID-19, deaths and complications occur. In addition, there are growing concerns about new variants in the virus and vaccine ineffectiveness. Also, data on how many vaccine doses are still necessary and sufficient in immunocompromised patients are limited. In addition, real-world evidence of these vaccines can guide clinicians in predicting complications in kidney transplant recipients. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 vaccines on kidney transplant recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Material and method

Study population

This matched case-control study included vaccinated kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 from two centers between 1 May and 1 October 2021. All patients in the vaccinated group received a minimum of two doses of the vaccine. All the vaccinated patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 at least one month after the last dose. Exclusion criteria were patients currently under treatment for COVID-19 (n = 3) and loss of follow-up after diagnosis (n = 2). Eighty-two participants were followed for at least fourteen days or until death. Each vaccinated patient was matched with an unvaccinated kidney transplant recipient diagnosed with COVID between 1 April 2020 and 1 October 2021. Age, gender, type of donor, and time from transplantation to COVID-19 diagnosis were matched using propensity score-match between groups (Fig. 1 ). No patient had a history of previous COVID-19 in both groups. The Istanbul Medical Faculty Medical Ethics Committee approved this study.
Fig. 1

Flow chart diagram of the patient and control group.

Flow chart diagram of the patient and control group.

Data collection

Demographic data (age, sex, comorbidities, etiology of primary kidney disease, duration of post-transplant follow-up, type of donor, induction therapy, maintenance immunosuppression, and medication), clinical characteristics (post-infection follow-up, duration of hospitalization, presenting symptoms, contact history, symptoms, examination findings, and laboratory results), and medication during COVID-19 (antiviral, antibiotic, cytokine‐targeted, anticoagulation treatment, and oxygen therapy) were extracted from electronic medical records.

Vaccination schedule

All the participants in the vaccinated group were administered at least two doses of either CoronaVac (Sinovac Life Sciences) or BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech). The first dose was applied on 17 January for CoronaVac and 18 March 2021 for BNT162b2, and the second dose was administered one month later. Booster doses were administered three to six months after the second. Also, some of the patients who received two doses of CoronaVac received boosters of BNT162b2. While twenty-one patients were vaccinated with two doses and fourteen patients with three doses of CoronaVac. Also, two doses of BNT162b2 were administered to twenty kidney transplant recipients, and two CoronaVac and one BNT162b2 to twenty-seven participants.

Patient management

All patients underwent blood testing at admission. Laboratory investigations included a complete blood count and serum C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6, markers of myocardial damage (creatine kinase, troponin I, lactate dehydrogenase), tests of secondary hemostasis profile (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time), serum biochemical tests (including renal and liver function, and electrolytes), procalcitonin, fibrinogen, d-dimer. Laboratory tests were repeated daily for inpatients and weekly for outpatients for two weeks. In addition, the modification of diet in the renal disease study equation (MDRD) was used to calculate the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Patients were divided into four groups according to the severity of the disease. Asymptomatic patients and patients with mild disease (oxygen saturation above 93%, no lung involvement on chest computed tomography) were followed up in the outpatient clinic weekly. Indications for hospitalization were moderate (oxygen saturation above 90%, respiratory rate under 30 breaths/min) and severe disease (oxygen saturation under 90%, respiratory rate above 30 breaths/min), cytokine storm (persistent fever, high or increasing CRP, ferritin, and D-dimer, liver function test abnormalities, hypofibrinogenemia with cytopenia in the forms of lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia). Criteria for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) were the partial pressure of arterial oxygen, the inspiratory oxygen fraction (PaO2 / FiO2) ratio<300, oxygen saturation<90%, and PaO2 below 70 mm Hg despite 5 L/minute oxygen therapy, and persistent hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg or mean arterial pressure < 65 mm Hg). The national COVID-19 guidelines were used for the diagnosis and treatment of the patients [9]. The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines graded acute kidney injury [10].

Treatment regimens

A standard protocol was used to manage immunosuppression, antiviral, and cytokine‐targeted therapy (Fig. 2 ). The immunosuppressive regimen was not changed if the patient was asymptomatic. Antimetabolites (mycophenolate derivatives and azathioprine) were discontinued in the remaining cases. Trough levels were maintained between 4 and 6 ng/dL for tacrolimus, 25–75 ng/dL for cyclosporine, and 3–7 ng/dL for everolimus for a patient with stable clinic course and were stopped in hypoxemic patients. The calcineurin inhibitor and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor levels were monitored twice a week in hospitalized patients, once a week in outpatients.
Fig. 2

Treatment scheme for COVID‐19 in kidney transplant recipients.

Treatment scheme for COVID‐19 in kidney transplant recipients. The patients were treated with hydroxychloroquine (400 mg twice a day for the first, and then 200 mg twice a day for four days via oral administration) in the first wave. Also, favipiravir (1600 mg twice a day for the first, and then 600 mg twice a day for the following four days via oral administration) was used in the later period of the pandemic. Tocilizumab (400–800 mg once a day for the two days via intravenous infusion) or anakinra (100–600 mg once a day for seven to fourteen days or until hospital discharge via subcutaneous injection) are used to treat cytokine storm. The administration of antibiotics was based on the infection specialist's decision in the presence of confirmed or suspected invasive bacterial infection. In addition, the patients were monitored for adverse drug reactions during the hospital stay.

Supportive care

Prophylactic-dose low molecular weight heparin was used for inpatients unless there were contraindications. Patients with deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism were treated with therapeutic-dose anticoagulation. Doses were adjusted according to the risk of bleeding in the patient. Oxygen treatment was provided to patients whose oxygen saturation was below 92% via a nasal cannula and with a non-rebreather mask if the former was insufficient. If respiratory failure persisted, invasive mechanical ventilation was applied following non-invasive ventilation.

Outcomes

The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoints were hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, acute kidney injury, cytokine storm, and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Statistical analysis

All parameters (patient demographics, clinical presentations, laboratory values at admission, treatment regimens, and outcomes) were classified according to the vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. Categorical variables were summarized with numbers and percentages. Quantitative variables are summarized with means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile range where appropriate. While chi-square and Fisher's exact test were performed for qualitative variables, the Mann-Whitney U test was used for quantitative variables with the nonparametric distribution. A p-value of<0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

The median age of vaccinated eighty-two participants was 45 years (interquartile range [IQR], 38–63), and 41 (50%) of the participants were men in the vaccinated group. The median time from transplantation to COVID-19 diagnosis was 113 months (IQR, 36–174) in the vaccinated group. The prevalence of heart disease (n = 13 [15.9%] vs. n = 10 [12.2%]; p = 0.460), pre-existing lung disease (n = 1 [1.2%] vs. n = 5 [6.1%]; p = 0.096), and post-transplant diabetes mellitus (n = 16 [19.5%] vs. n = 14 [17.1%]; p = 0.714) were similar between the groups. However, chronic hypertension (n = 43 [52.4%] vs. n = 60 [73.2%]; p = 0.010) was more common in the control group compared to the patient group. Sixty-three (76.8%) of the patient population underwent kidney transplantation from a living donor. Also, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of anti-T-lymphocyte globulin use (n = 45 [54.9%] vs. n = 48 [58.5%]; p = 0.636), previous rejection episodes (n = 7 [8.5%] vs. n = 11 [13.4%]; p = 0.304), and BK virus nephropathy (n = 2 [2.4%] vs. n = 2 [2.4%]; p = 1). The most common maintenance immunosuppressive agents in both groups were tacrolimus, mycophenolate derivatives, and corticosteroids. The demographic characteristics and immunosuppression regimen of patients are shown in Table 1 .
Table 1

Patients’ demographic characteristics and immunosuppression regimen.

Vaccinated patients(n = 82)Control group(n = 82)p-value
Age (year)45 (38–63)47 (39–60)0.588
Sex
Male41 (50)41 (50)1
Female41 (50)41 (50)
Duration from tx to COVID-19 (months)113 (36–174)106 (36–171)0.844
Time from vaccination to COVID-19 (months)114 (78–158)
Etiology of CKD0.200
Hypertensive nephropathy8 (9.8)5 (6.1)
Diabetic nephropathy8 (9.8)12 (14.6)
Chronic glomerulonephritis11 (13.4)12 (14.6)
CAKUT13 (15.9)20 (24.4)
Other14 (17.1)5 (6.1)
Unknown28 (34.1)28 (34.1)
Comorbid diseases
Pre-existing lung disease1 (1.2)5 (6.1)0.096
Previous heart disease13 (15.9)10 (12.2)0.460
Chronic hypertension43 (52.4)60 (73.2)0.010
Post-transplant diabetes mellitus16 (19.5)14 (17.1)0.714
Type of donor
Living63 (76.8)63 (76.8)1
Cadaver19 (23.2)19 (23.2)
Induction therapyATLG45 (54.9)48 (58.5)0.636
Posttransplant complications7 (8.5)11 (13.4)0.304
Allograft rejection2 (2.4)2 (2.4)1
BK virus nephropathyCMV viremia00
Maintenance immunosuppression at admission
Tacrolimus63 (76.8)68 (82.9)0.330
Cyclosporine A11 (13.4)8 (9.8)0.464
Everolimus4 (4.9)5 (6.1)0.731
Sirolimus1 (1.2)2 (2.4)0.271
Mycophenolate derivatives70 (85.4)73 (89)0.483
Azathioprine8 (9.8)3 (3.7)0.129
Steroids77 (93.9)81 (98.8)0.210

Abbreviations: ATLG: anti-T-lymphocyte globulin; CAKUT: congenital abnormalities of the urinary tract; CKD: chronic kidney disease; CMV: cytomegalovirus; tx: transplantation.

P-values ​compared vaccinated patients and control group, obtained from the Chi-Square test, Fisher’s exact test, or Mann–Whitney U test. Data were presented as n (%) or median [Interquartile range 25–75] unless otherwise noted. Bold indicates statistically significant associations (p < 0.05).

Patients’ demographic characteristics and immunosuppression regimen. Abbreviations: ATLG: anti-T-lymphocyte globulin; CAKUT: congenital abnormalities of the urinary tract; CKD: chronic kidney disease; CMV: cytomegalovirus; tx: transplantation. P-values ​compared vaccinated patients and control group, obtained from the Chi-Square test, Fisher’s exact test, or Mann–Whitney U test. Data were presented as n (%) or median [Interquartile range 25–75] unless otherwise noted. Bold indicates statistically significant associations (p < 0.05).

Clinical presentations

Cough (n = 52 [65.9%] vs. n = 49 [59.8%]; p = 0.426) was the most frequent symptom at admission in both groups, shown in Table 2 . Diarrhea (n = 28 [34.1%] vs. n = 16 [19.5%]; p = 0.034) was more common in the vaccinated group than in the control group. Lymphocyte count was lower in the control compared to the vaccinated patients (900 [IQR, 560–1370] vs. 1060 [IQR, 760–1600]; p = 0.173). Also, a significant difference was found in the serum albumin levels (4.1 [IQR, 3.6–4.4] vs. 3.7 [IQR, 3.4–4.2]; p = 0.024) (Table 2). The median serum creatinine levels at admission were similar between the groups (1.2 [IQR, 0.9–1.6] vs. 1.3 [IQR, 1–1.7]; p = 0.465).
Table 2

Patients’ clinical characteristics and laboratory results at admission.

Vaccinated patients(n = 82)Control group(n = 82)p-value
Presentation symptoms
Fever36 (43.9)42 (51.2)0.348
Cough52 (65.9)49 (59.8)0.426
Dyspnea20 (25.3)18 (22)0.615
Diarrhea28 (34.1)16 (19.5)0.034
Initial examination findings
Pulse rate (/min)60 (60–64)78 (60–90)<0.001
SpO2 value (%)98 (95–99)98 (95–99)0.687
Respiratory rate (/min)18 (16–18)18 (18–20)0.004
Blood pressure (mmHg)
Systolic110 (110–120)120 (110–125)0.003
Diastolic80 (70–80)80 (78–80)0.022
Laboratory results at admission
Serum creatinine (mg/dL)1.2 (0.9–1.6)1.3 (1–1.7)0.465
Leucocyte count (/mm3)6000 (4500–8100)6650 (4690–8340)0.540
Lymphocyte count (/mm3)1060 (760–1600)900 (560–1370)0.173
Hemoglobin (g/dL)13 (11.3–14)12.8 (11.3–14)0.530
Platelet count (/mm3)196 (159–258)205 (152–271)0.521
Serum CRP levels (mg/L)16 (6–35)18 (3–46)0.972
Serum ALT levels (IU/L)21 (15–30)18 (14–24)0.274
Serum AST levels (IU/L)22 (17–32)20 (17–27)0.138
Serum LDH levels (IU/L)215 (184–261)238 (186–307)0.243
Serum D-dimer (ng/mL)338 (179–658)420 (305–772)0.057
Serum Ferritin (ng/mL)232 (111–573)326 (99–646)0.556
Serum Albumin (g/dL)4.1 (3.6–4.4)3.7 (3.4–4.2)0.024
Serum IL-6 (pg/mL)1.5 (1.1–11)1.6 (0.8–4.5)0.637
Procalcitonin (ng/mL)0.08 (0.04–0.21)0.08 (0.04–0.53)0.953

Abbreviations: SpO2: blood oxygen saturation levels; CRP: C-reactive protein; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; IL-6: Interleukin 6. P-values compared vaccinated patients and control group, obtained from the Chi-Square test, Fisher’s exact test, or Mann–Whitney U test. Data were presented as n (%) or median [Interquartile range 25–75] unless otherwise noted. Bold indicates statistically significant associations (p < 0.05).

Patients’ clinical characteristics and laboratory results at admission. Abbreviations: SpO2: blood oxygen saturation levels; CRP: C-reactive protein; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; IL-6: Interleukin 6. P-values compared vaccinated patients and control group, obtained from the Chi-Square test, Fisher’s exact test, or Mann–Whitney U test. Data were presented as n (%) or median [Interquartile range 25–75] unless otherwise noted. Bold indicates statistically significant associations (p < 0.05). Antimetabolites were discontinued in 66 (80.5%) vaccinated and 69 (84.1%) unvaccinated patients (p = 0.539). Also, calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolate derivative were stopped in 9 (11%) patients in the vaccinated group and 10 (12.2%) patients in the control group (p = 0.807). In addition, hydroxychloroquine was used only in 17 (20.7%) unvaccinated patients. Usage of favipiravir (60 [73.1%] vs. 64 [78%]; p = 0.467), anakinra (3 [3.7] vs. 4 [4.9]; p = 0.699) and tocilizumab (1 [1.2%] vs. 2 [2.4%]; p = 0.560) were similar between the groups. Usage of antibiotics (18 [22.5%] vs. 38 [46.3%]; p < 0.001) and anticoagulation (17 [20.7%] vs. 34 [41.5%]; p = 0.004) were significantly higher in the control group compared to the vaccinated group. Duration of hospitalization was longer in the control group compared to the patient group (8 [IQR, 5–12] vs. 11 [IQR, 7–21]; p < 0.001). Four patients in the vaccinated group (4.9%) and nine patients (11%) in the control group died during follow-up (p = 0.247). Seventeen patients (20.7%) in the vaccinated group, thirty-four participants (41.5%) in the control group were hospitalized (p = 0.004). Also, five vaccinated patients (6.1%) and ten unvaccinated patients (12.2%) were followed up in the ICU during follow-up (p = 0.168). Five vaccinated (6.1%) and ten unvaccinated patients (12.2%) received mechanical ventilation (p = 0.168), shown in Table 3 . In addition, one vaccinated patient died from multiorgan failure secondary to cytokine storm, and three were lost due to respiratory failure (Table 4 ). Two of the deceased patients received two doses of CoronaVac, while one patient received two doses of BNT162b2, and one patient was vaccinated with two doses of CoronaVac and one dose of BNT162b2. Any adverse events did not occur, and no drug interactions were detected during follow-up.
Table 3

Patients’ vaccine, treatment regimens and outcomes.

Vaccinated patients(n = 82)Control group(n = 82)p-value
Duration of hospitalization (days)8 (5–12)11 (7–21)<0.001
Follow-up after COVID-1957 (32–81)134 (104–203)0.812
Vaccine Regimens
Two doses of CoronoVac21 (25.6)
Two doses of BNT162b220 (24.4)
Three doses of CoronoVac14 (17.1)
Two doses of CoronoVac and one of BNT162b227 (32.9)
Withdrawal of IS agent
Calcineurin inhibitors9 (11)10 (12.2)0.807
Antimetabolites66 (80.5)69 (84.1)0.539
Treatment of infection
Hydroxychloroquine017 (20.7)<0.001
Favipiravir60 (73.1)64 (78)0.467
Cytokine‐targeted therapy4 (4.9)6 (7.3)0.514
Anakinra3 (3.7)4 (4.9)0.699
Tocilizumab1 (1.2)2 (2.4)0.560
Anticoagulation17 (20.7)34 (41.5)0.004
Antibiotics18 (22.5)38 (46.3)<0.001
Ventilation devices
Nasal cannula9 (11)20 (24.3)0.244
Non-invasive ventilation4 (4.9)8 (9.8)0.230
Mechanical ventilation5 (6.1)10 (12.2)0.168
Acute kidney injury13 (15.9)20 (24.4)0.160
Stage 19 (11)7 (8.8)0.599
Stage 23 (3.7)6 (7.3)0.495
Stage 31 (1.2)7 (8.5)0.029
Endpoints
Cytokine storm4 (4.9)11 (13.4)0.061
ARDS5 (6.1)10 (12.2)0.168
Hospitalized patient17 (20.7)34 (41.5)0.004
Follow-up in ICU5 (6.1)10 (12.2)0.168
Death4 (4.9)9 (11)0.247

Abbreviations; IS: immunosuppression; IVIG: intravenous immunoglobulin; ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome; ICU: intensive care unit.

P-values compared vaccinated patients and control group obtained from the Chi-Square test, Fisher’s exact test, or Mann–Whitney U test. Data were presented as n (%) or median [Interquartile range 25–75] unless otherwise noted. Bold indicates statistically significant associations (p < 0.05).

Table 4

Demographics, immunosuppressives and treatment regimens of vaccinated death patients.

Patient 1Patient 2Patient 3Patient 4
SexFemaleFemaleFemaleFemale
Age (years)52496046
Etiology of CKDUnknownDiabetic nephropathyPolycystic kidney diseasePolycystic kidney disease
Type of donorCadaverLivingLivingLiving
Induction regimenATLGATLGATLGATLG
Maintenance ISTac + MMF + SteroidTac + MMF + SteroidTac + MMF + SteroidTac + MMF + Steroid
Time from Tx to COVID-19 (months)4914318274
Doses of vaccinationTwo dosesTwo dosesThree dosesTwo doses
Type of vaccinesCoronaVacCoronaVacTwo CoronaVac andone BNT162b2BNT162b2
Time from the last vaccine to hospitalization (days)92334557
Length of hospitalization (days)15212211
Severity of COVID-19Critically severeCritically severeCritically severeCritically severe
Cytokine stormYesYesYesYes
Changes of ISduring COVID-19Withdrawal of TAC + MMFWithdrawal of TAC + MMFWithdrawal of TAC + MMFWithdrawal of TAC + MMF
Antiviral agentsFavipiravirFavipiravirFavipiravirFavipiravir
AnticoagulationEnoxaparinEnoxaparinEnoxaparinEnoxaparin

Abbreviations; TAC: Tacrolimus; MMF: Mycophenolate mofetil.

Patients’ vaccine, treatment regimens and outcomes. Abbreviations; IS: immunosuppression; IVIG: intravenous immunoglobulin; ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome; ICU: intensive care unit. P-values compared vaccinated patients and control group obtained from the Chi-Square test, Fisher’s exact test, or Mann–Whitney U test. Data were presented as n (%) or median [Interquartile range 25–75] unless otherwise noted. Bold indicates statistically significant associations (p < 0.05). Demographics, immunosuppressives and treatment regimens of vaccinated death patients. Abbreviations; TAC: Tacrolimus; MMF: Mycophenolate mofetil. Thirteen of the vaccinated (15.9%) and twenty unvaccinated patients (24.4%) developed acute kidney injury (p = 0.16). However, stage three acute kidney injury (n = 1 [1.2%] vs. n = 7 [8.5%]; p = 0.029) was more common in controls patients than in the vaccinated. The occurrence of cytokine storm (n = 4 [4.9%] vs. n = 11 [13.4%]; p = 0.061) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (n = 5 [6.1%] vs. n = 10 [12.2%]; p = 0.168) was higher in the patient group compared to the control group, but these did not reach statistical significance.

Discussion

COVID-19 remains a significant cause of complications and death in kidney transplant recipients despite advancing treatment protocols and vaccines. This study examined COVID-19 outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated kidney transplant recipients with similar risk factors. The hospitalization rate was lower in the vaccinated patients than in the control group (n = 17 vs. n = 34, p = 0.004). Also, the median hospital stay was shorter in the vaccinated group than in the control group (8 vs. 11; p < 0.001). The mortality rate was 4.9% in the vaccinated group and 11% in the unvaccinated group (p = 0.247). While BNT162b2 was reported to have 100% efficacy and 86% effectiveness, the CoronaVac has 100% efficacy and 70% to 90% effectiveness in preventing death in healthy individuals with COVID-19 [11], [12]. Although the ratios vary by a variant of the virus and study population, vaccines are the best method of preventing death in a healthy population with COVID-19 [7]. However, data regarding the effectiveness of vaccines in preventing death in kidney transplant recipients is insufficient and controversial. A few controversial studies investigate whether two doses of vaccine reduce mortality in kidney transplant recipients. Although this has been shown in UK registry analysis, another study did not confirm this effect. [13], [14]. In our study, although the mortality rate in the vaccinated patients was lower than in the unvaccinated group, this did not reach statistical significance. This condition may be explained by the unknown effectiveness of the inactivated virus vaccine in kidney transplant recipients, the low total mortality rate, and the low number of patients. On the other hand, this study demonstrated that some kidney transplant recipients still suffer from various complications during COVID-19 despite three doses of vaccines. After excluding kidney transplant recipients in phase III trials, measuring B- and T-cell response to the COVID-19 vaccine has become a research model [15], [16]. BNT162b2 and CoronaVac are well tolerated and protective against COVID-19 in healthy adults. However, in kidney transplant recipients, mRNA-based BNT162b2 has been shown to induce a higher nucleocapsid antibody response and T cell response than the inactivated vaccine, CoronoVac [17]. Also, the antibody response persists longer in BNT162b2 and is more effective against the omicron variant than the CoronoVac in a healthy population [18]. On the other hand, in another study, no antibody response was detected in 51.4% of the patients, despite four doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients [19]. Also, no antibody response was determined in 82% of the kidney transplant recipients who received two doses of CoronaVac [16]. However, there has been no standardized assay and threshold limit in kidney transplant recipients yet. According to our research, vaccines have reduced the severity of the disease and the length of hospital stay. On the other hand, it was impossible to conclude the required vaccine doses and more effective vaccine type due to the limited number of patients, different protocols, and lack of immunity measurement. The effectiveness of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac in preventing hospitalizations with COVID-19 in healthy individuals was previously shown to be 80–90% and 80%, respectively [12], [20]. The COVID-19 vaccines decreased the hospitalization rate and hospitalization duration in our study. Also, the higher antibiotic usage may be explained by the elevation of nosocomial infections due to the longer hospitalization duration in the control group. Our study has several limitations; the number of patients was small, the follow-up period was short, PCR was collected only from symptomatic patients, and strain identification and immune response measurements were not available. These restrictions did not allow us to make definitive decisions, so a prospective study is needed to confirm our results. The strengths of this study consisted of the presence of matching control groups and standard treatment regimens of both centers. In conclusion, COVID-19 remains a fatal disease despite advancing treatment modalities and preventive strategies. Vaccines decrease hospitalization rate and duration in most patients, but complications can occur if kidney transplant recipients have only received two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  15 in total

1.  Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on covid-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England: test negative case-control study.

Authors:  Jamie Lopez Bernal; Nick Andrews; Charlotte Gower; Chris Robertson; Julia Stowe; Elise Tessier; Ruth Simmons; Simon Cottrell; Richard Roberts; Mark O'Doherty; Kevin Brown; Claire Cameron; Diane Stockton; Jim McMenamin; Mary Ramsay
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-05-13

2.  Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors:  David S Khoury; Deborah Cromer; Arnold Reynaldi; Timothy E Schlub; Adam K Wheatley; Jennifer A Juno; Kanta Subbarao; Stephen J Kent; James A Triccas; Miles P Davenport
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 87.241

3.  Clinical, Functional, and Mental Health Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients 3 Months After a Diagnosis of COVID-19.

Authors:  Raphaël Duivenvoorden; Priya Vart; Marlies Noordzij; Augusto C Soares Dos Santos; Alex B Zulkarnaev; Casper F M Franssen; Dirk Kuypers; Erol Demir; Hormat Rahimzadeh; Julia Kerschbaum; Kitty J Jager; Kultigin Turkmen; Marc H Hemmelder; Marcel Schouten; María Luisa Rodríguez-Ferrero; Marta Crespo; Ron T Gansevoort; Luuk B Hilbrands
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 5.385

4.  Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.

Authors:  Fernando P Polack; Stephen J Thomas; Nicholas Kitchin; Judith Absalon; Alejandra Gurtman; Stephen Lockhart; John L Perez; Gonzalo Pérez Marc; Edson D Moreira; Cristiano Zerbini; Ruth Bailey; Kena A Swanson; Satrajit Roychoudhury; Kenneth Koury; Ping Li; Warren V Kalina; David Cooper; Robert W Frenck; Laura L Hammitt; Özlem Türeci; Haylene Nell; Axel Schaefer; Serhat Ünal; Dina B Tresnan; Susan Mather; Philip R Dormitzer; Uğur Şahin; Kathrin U Jansen; William C Gruber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Safety and Reactogenicity of 2 Doses of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Michael T Ou; Brian J Boyarsky; Jennifer D Motter; Ross S Greenberg; Aura T Teles; Jake A Ruddy; Michelle R Krach; Vedant S Jain; William A Werbel; Robin K Avery; Allan B Massie; Dorry L Segev; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Two Doses of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Reduce Risk of Death Due to COVID-19 in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Preliminary Outcomes From a UK Registry Linkage Analysis.

Authors:  Rommel Ravanan; Lisa Mumford; Ines Ushiro-Lumb; Chris Callaghan; Gavin Pettigrew; Douglas Thorburn; Dale Gardiner; John Forsythe
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 5.385

7.  Assessment of 4 Doses of SARS-CoV-2 Messenger RNA-Based Vaccine in Recipients of a Solid Organ Transplant.

Authors:  Nassim Kamar; Florence Abravanel; Olivier Marion; Raphaelle Romieu-Mourez; Chloé Couat; Arnaud Del Bello; Jacques Izopet
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01

8.  COVID-19-related mortality in kidney transplant and dialysis patients: results of the ERACODA collaboration.

Authors:  Luuk B Hilbrands; Raphaël Duivenvoorden; Priya Vart; Casper F M Franssen; Marc H Hemmelder; Kitty J Jager; Lyanne M Kieneker; Marlies Noordzij; Michelle J Pena; Hanne de Vries; David Arroyo; Adrian Covic; Marta Crespo; Eric Goffin; Mahmud Islam; Ziad A Massy; Nuria Montero; João P Oliveira; Ana Roca Muñoz; J Emilio Sanchez; Sivakumar Sridharan; Rebecca Winzeler; Ron T Gansevoort
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 5.992

9.  Antibody response to two doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Rezzan Eren Sadioğlu; Erol Demir; Ebru Evren; Merve Aktar; Seda Şafak; Ayşe Serra Artan; Sevim Meşe; Ali Ağaçfidan; Güle Çınar; Mustafa Önel; Zeynep Ceren Karahan; Şule Şengül; Kenan Keven; Aydın Türkmen
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2021-10-17

10.  Use of tocilizumab in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19.

Authors:  María J Pérez-Sáez; Miquel Blasco; Dolores Redondo-Pachón; Pedro Ventura-Aguiar; Teresa Bada-Bosch; Isabel Pérez-Flores; Edoardo Melilli; Luis A Sánchez-Cámara; María O López-Oliva; Cristina Canal; Amir Shabaka; Núria Garra-Moncau; Paloma L Martín-Moreno; Verónica López; Román Hernández-Gallego; Orlando Siverio; Cristina Galeano; Jordi Espí-Reig; Carlos J Cabezas; María T Rodrigo; Laura Llinàs-Mallol; María J Fernández-Reyes; Leónidas Cruzado-Vega; Lourdes Pérez-Tamajón; Raquel Santana-Estupiñán; María C Ruiz-Fuentes; Guadalupe Tabernero; Sofía Zárraga; Juan C Ruiz; Alex Gutiérrez-Dalmau; Auxiliadora Mazuecos; Emilio Sánchez-Álvarez; Marta Crespo; Julio Pascual
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 9.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.