| Literature DB >> 35502827 |
Zili Zhang1,2,3,4, Yu Xing1,2,3,4, Wenqing Gao2,3,4,5, Liping Yang1,2,3,4, Junzhong Shi1,2,3,4, Weiliang Song1,2,3,4, Tong Li2,3,4,5.
Abstract
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification acts as the most prevalent internal modification in eukaryotic mRNA. Emerging evidence shows the critical biological roles of m6A key enzymes in human cancers. However, the roles of m6A binding protein IGF2BP2 in gastric cancer (GC) progression are still unclear. In this study, we confirmed that IGF2BP2 was highly expressed in GC cell lines and tumor tissues. Knocking down of IGF2BP2 suppressed cell proliferation and migration, and repressed xenograft tumor growth in vivo, while IGF2BP2 overexpression promoted the proliferation and migration. Mechanistically, we identified that IGF2BP2 regulated GC the proliferation/migration through recognizing the m6A modification sites of SIRT1 mRNA. In general, our findings demonstrated a novel regulatory mechanism that IGF2BP2/SIRT1 axis modulated GC progression in an m6A-dependent manner, suggesting that m6A may be a therapeutic target for GC.Entities:
Keywords: Gastric cancer; IGF2BP2; N6-methyladenosine; SIRT1
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35502827 PMCID: PMC9275927 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2068920
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 6.832
GC patients’ clinicopathological characteristic with IGF2BP2 expression
| | 50 | IGF2BP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | ||||
| Age | <55 | 27 | 12 | 15 | 0.395 |
| ≥55 | 23 | 13 | 10 | ||
| Gender | Male | 28 | 15 | 13 | 0.776 |
| Female | 22 | 10 | 12 | ||
| TNM stage | I/II | 19 | 13 | 6 | 0.041* |
| III/IV | 31 | 12 | 19 | ||
| Lymph metastasis | Yes | 32 | 15 | 17 | 0.556 |
| No | 18 | 10 | 8 | ||
| Distant metastasis | Yes | 14 | 6 | 8 | 0.528 |
| No | 36 | 19 | 17 | ||
| Tumor differentiation | Well | 10 | 3 | 7 | 0.617 |
| Moderate | 11 | 5 | 6 | ||
| Poor | 29 | 17 | 12 | ||
TNM, tumor-node-metastasis. Well: Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma; Moderate, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma; Poor, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma.
Figure 1.IGF2BP2 indicated the poor prognosis of GC patients. (a) The level of IGF2BP2 was detected in the clinical samples as compared to the normal tissue. (b) The level of IGF2BP2 was found to be upregulated in gastric adenocarcinoma cohort as compared to the normal cohort based on GEPIA database (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/index.html). (c) RT-PCR analysis revealed the IGF2BP2 mRNA level in GC cell lines (SNU-216, MKN45, AGS) and normal cells (GES-1). (d) Kaplan–Meier method following log-rank test indicated the overall survival rate of GC patients with higher/lower IGF2BP2 level. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Figure 2.IGF2BP2 promoted the malignant phenotypes of GC cells. (a, b) RT-PCR and western blotting analysis detected the IGF2BP2 mRNA levels or protein levels in MKN45 cells with IGF2BP2 overexpression or AGS cells with IGF2BP2 knockdown. (c) CCK-8 proliferative ability assay showed the proliferation of MKN45 cells for IGF2BP2 overexpression and AGS cells for IGF2BP2 silencing. (d, e) Migration assay using transwell illustrated the migrative quantity of MKN45 cells for IGF2BP2 overexpression and AGS cells for IGF2BP2 silencing. (f, g) Apoptosis using flow cytometry demonstrated the apoptotic rate of MKN45 cells and AGS cells. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Figure 3.SIRT1 acted as the target of IGF2BP2. (a) Online predictive tools (SRAMP, http://www.cuilab.cn/sramp) discovered that the m6A modification site on SIRT1 genome. (b) Clinical interaction analysis (GEPIA, http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/index.html) found the positive correlation within IGF2BP2 with SIRT1 levels in stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) cohorts. (c) The m6A modification sites were ‘GGACU’ (chr10:69,676,212 ~ 69,676,257) in the 3’-UTR of SIRT1 genome. (d) The motif of IGF2BP2 was consistently identified as ‘GGACU’ sequence by RMBase v2.0 (https://rna.sysu.edu.cn/rmbase/). (e) RNA binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP) analysis indicated the enriched SIRT1 mRNA expression in the anti-IGF2BP2 antibody precipitation and control IgG in GC cells (MKN45, AGS). (f) RIP-PCR illustrated the role of IGF2BP2 on IGF2BP2 with SIRT1 in GC cells (MKN45, AGS). **p < 0.01.
Figure 4.IGF2BP2 enhanced the stability of SIRT1 mRNA. (a, b) RT-PCR analysis was performed to detect the level of SIRT1 mRNA in MKN45 cells transfected with IGF2BP2 overexpression (IGF2BP2 OE) and in AGS cells transfected with IGF2BP2 knockdown (sh-IGF2BP2), as well as their controls vectors. (c, d) RNA stability analysis was performed using the Act D administration (Actinomycin D, 2 μg/ml). MKN45 cells was transfected with IGF2BP2 overexpression (IGF2BP2 OE) or SIRT1 knockdown (si-SIRT1). AGS cells was transfected with IGF2BP2 knockdown (sh-IGF2BP2) or SIRT1 overexpression (SIRT1 OE). (e, f) Animal in vivo xenograft assay was performed in BALB/c nude mice with subcutaneously injection. Tumor volume (e) and neoplasm weight (f) were recorded. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Figure 5.Our findings demonstrated a novel regulatory mechanism that IGF2BP2/SIRT1 axis modulated GC progression in an m6A-dependent manner.