Literature DB >> 35502388

Evaluating left atrial appendage function in a subtype of non-valvular atrial fibrillation using transesophageal echocardiography combined with two-dimensional speckle tracking.

Li Wang1, Jiali Fan1, Zixuan Wang2, Yuping Liao1, Bingyuan Zhou1, Changsheng Ma1.   

Abstract

Background: The use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a clinically feasible method for quantitative analysis of left atrial appendage (LAA) function. LAA dysfunction is closely associated with atrial fibrillation (AF)-related stroke. However, there are few studies on the changes in LAA function in patients with different types of AF. This study aimed to observe changes in LAA systolic motion and function in patients with different types of AF by using speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE).
Methods: A retrospective study of 216 patients with non-valvular AF was conducted. The LAA was divided into three parts: the basal segment (B), middle segment (M), and top segment (A). Speck -racking technology was used to measure and record the forward strain values of the basal segment (B), middle segment (M), and top segment (A) of the LAA, and the peak positive strain dispersion of the LAA was calculated. The left atrial appendage mechanical dispersion (LAAMD) was defined as the standard deviation (SD) of the peak positive strain at each segment of the R-R interval.
Results: Partial speckle-tracking parameters of the LAA showed statistical significance between the two groups. The peak strain on the top segment of the LAA was reduced in the persistent atrial fibrillation (per-AF) group compared to the paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (par-AF) group [11.87 (6.47-20.12) vs. 16.02 (9.76-24.50); 12.66 (6.66-21.22) vs. 20.16 (14.16-30.56); both P<0.01]. In the group with lower LAAMD, the proportion of patients with persistent AF (per-AF) was higher (66.3% vs. 33.7%; P<0.001), the left atrial dilatation was more significant (45.80±5.656 vs. 42.85±4.867; P<0.001), the LAA filling velocity and LAA empty velocity were lower (42.35±20.354 vs. 51.0±20.599; 38.71±24.39 vs. 51.62±21.282; both P<0.001), the LAA ejection fraction was significantly lower (52.16±25.538 vs. 70.85±20.741; P=0.000), and the peak positive strains of the M and A of the LAA were lower than those in the higher LAAMD group. Conclusions: The deformability of the LAA is decreased diffusely in per-AF, especially in the A of the LAA. Compliance with LAA was worse in patients with per-AF than in those with par-AF. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF); left atrial appendage (LAA); speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE); transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)

Year:  2022        PMID: 35502388      PMCID: PMC9014135          DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  28 in total

1.  Left atrial appendage function analyzed by tissue Doppler imaging in mitral stenosis: effect of afterload reduction after mitral valve commissurotomy.

Authors:  Fabrice Bauer; Arnaud Verdonck; Iris Schuster; Christophe Tron; Helénè Eltchaninoff; Alain Cribier; Geneviève Derumeaux
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.251

2.  Atrial myocardial deformation properties are temporarily reduced after cardioversion for atrial fibrillation and correlate well with left atrial appendage function.

Authors:  Ergün Baris Kaya; Lale Tokgözoglu; Kudret Aytemir; Ugur Kocabas; Erol Tülümen; Onur Sinan Deveci; Sedat Köse; Giray Kabakçi; Nasih Nazli; Hilmi Ozkutlu; Ali Oto
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2007-09-10

Review 3.  Prolonged rhythm monitoring for the detection of occult paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in ischemic stroke of unknown cause.

Authors:  Raymond C S Seet; Paul A Friedman; Alejandro A Rabinstein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Echocardiographic assessment of the left atrial appendage.

Authors:  Y Agmon; B K Khandheria; F Gentile; J B Seward
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Assessment of left atrial appendage function by transesophageal echocardiography. Implications for the development of thrombus.

Authors:  C Pollick; D Taylor
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Assessment of left atrial appendage function during sinus rhythm in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: transesophageal echocardiography and tissue doppler study.

Authors:  Selcen Yakar Tuluce; Meral Kayikcioglu; Kamil Tuluce; Meral Gulsum Yilmaz; Oner Ozdogan; Mehmet Aydın; Can Hasdemir
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 5.251

7.  Left atrial appendage strain rate is associated with documented thromboembolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Monika Jankajova; Lucia Kubikova; Gabriel Valocik; Peter Candik; Peter Mitro; Marian Kurecko; Frantisek Sabol; Adrian Kolesar; Maria Kubikova; Marianna Vachalcova; Marianna Dvoroznakova
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Index-beat assessment of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function during atrial fibrillation using myocardial strain and strain rate.

Authors:  Kenya Kusunose; Hirotsugu Yamada; Susumu Nishio; Noriko Tomita; Junko Hotchi; Mika Bando; Toshiyuki Niki; Koji Yamaguchi; Yoshio Taketani; Takashi Iwase; Takeshi Soeki; Tetsuzo Wakatsuki; Masataka Sata
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 5.251

9.  Systolic tissue velocity is a useful echocardiographic parameter in assessment of left atrial appendage function in patients with mitral stenosis.

Authors:  Murat Cayli; Esmeray Acartürk; Mesut Demir; Mehmet Kanadaşi
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.724

10.  Association of Autoantibodies against M2-Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor with Atrial Fibrosis in Atrial Fibrillation Patients.

Authors:  Guiling Ma; Xuejiao Wu; Lijun Zeng; Jiawei Jin; Xingpeng Liu; Jianjun Zhang; Lin Zhang
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 1.866

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.