Mingrui Yang1,2, Ceylan Colak3, Kishore K Chundru3, Sibaji Gaj1,2, Andreas Nanavati1,2, Morgan H Jones4, Carl S Winalski1,2,3, Naveen Subhas2,3, Xiaojuan Li1,2,3. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 2. Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 3. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to build a deep learning model to automatically segment heterogeneous clinical MRI scans by optimizing a pre-trained model built from a homogeneous research dataset with transfer learning. Methods: Conditional generative adversarial networks pretrained on the Osteoarthritis Initiative MR images was transferred to 30 sets of heterogenous MR images collected from clinical routines. Two trained radiologists manually segmented the 30 sets of clinical MR images for model training, validation and test. The model performance was compared to models trained from scratch with different datasets, as well as two radiologists. A 5-fold cross validation was performed. Results: The transfer learning model obtained an overall averaged Dice coefficient of 0.819, an averaged 95 percentile Hausdorff distance of 1.463 mm, and an averaged average symmetric surface distance of 0.350 mm on the 5 random holdout test sets. A 5-fold cross validation had a mean Dice coefficient of 0.801, mean 95 percentile Hausdorff distance of 1.746 mm, and mean average symmetric surface distance of 0.364 mm. It outperformed other models and performed similarly as the radiologists. Conclusions: A transfer learning model was able to automatically segment knee cartilage, with performance comparable to human, using heterogeneous clinical MR images with a small training data size. In addition, the model proved robust when tested through cross validation and on images from a different vendor. We found it feasible to perform fully automated cartilage segmentation of clinical knee MR images, which would facilitate the clinical application of quantitative MRI techniques and other prediction models for improved patient treatment planning. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Background: This study aimed to build a deep learning model to automatically segment heterogeneous clinical MRI scans by optimizing a pre-trained model built from a homogeneous research dataset with transfer learning. Methods: Conditional generative adversarial networks pretrained on the Osteoarthritis Initiative MR images was transferred to 30 sets of heterogenous MR images collected from clinical routines. Two trained radiologists manually segmented the 30 sets of clinical MR images for model training, validation and test. The model performance was compared to models trained from scratch with different datasets, as well as two radiologists. A 5-fold cross validation was performed. Results: The transfer learning model obtained an overall averaged Dice coefficient of 0.819, an averaged 95 percentile Hausdorff distance of 1.463 mm, and an averaged average symmetric surface distance of 0.350 mm on the 5 random holdout test sets. A 5-fold cross validation had a mean Dice coefficient of 0.801, mean 95 percentile Hausdorff distance of 1.746 mm, and mean average symmetric surface distance of 0.364 mm. It outperformed other models and performed similarly as the radiologists. Conclusions: A transfer learning model was able to automatically segment knee cartilage, with performance comparable to human, using heterogeneous clinical MR images with a small training data size. In addition, the model proved robust when tested through cross validation and on images from a different vendor. We found it feasible to perform fully automated cartilage segmentation of clinical knee MR images, which would facilitate the clinical application of quantitative MRI techniques and other prediction models for improved patient treatment planning. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
Generative adversarial networks; automated segmentation; clinical knee MRI; deep learning; transfer learning
Authors: Ome Cleveland; Nicolas S Piuzzi; Greg Strnad; Peter Brooks; Carolyn M Hettrich; Carlos Higuera-Rueda; Joseph Iannotti; Michael W Kattan; Robert Molloy; T Sean Lynch; Alex Milinovich; Eric T Ricchetti; James Rosneck; Mark Schickendantz; Kurt P Spindler Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2019-03-06 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Richard Kijowski; Michael A Woods; Timothy A McGuine; John J Wilson; Ben K Graf; Arthur A De Smet Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Konstantinos Kamnitsas; Christian Ledig; Virginia F J Newcombe; Joanna P Simpson; Andrew D Kane; David K Menon; Daniel Rueckert; Ben Glocker Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2016-10-29 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Dimitri A Kessler; James W MacKay; Victoria A Crowe; Frances M D Henson; Martin J Graves; Fiona J Gilbert; Joshua D Kaggie Journal: Comput Med Imaging Graph Date: 2020-09-28 Impact factor: 4.790
Authors: Nicholas Bien; Pranav Rajpurkar; Robyn L Ball; Jeremy Irvin; Allison Park; Erik Jones; Michael Bereket; Bhavik N Patel; Kristen W Yeom; Katie Shpanskaya; Safwan Halabi; Evan Zucker; Gary Fanton; Derek F Amanatullah; Christopher F Beaulieu; Geoffrey M Riley; Russell J Stewart; Francis G Blankenberg; David B Larson; Ricky H Jones; Curtis P Langlotz; Andrew Y Ng; Matthew P Lungren Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 11.069