| Literature DB >> 35502194 |
Hemraj Sharma1, Arjun Sharma1, Bimala Sharma1, Sonu Karna1.
Abstract
A selective, sensitive, and environmentally safe spectrophotometry method was developed and validated for the determination of zinc in pharmaceutical substances using natural reagents obtained from the leaves of plant Acacia catechu. Different factors were optimized such as volume of reagent, selection of pH, and stability of the color complex. The drug showed a stable yellowish orange color complex at 550 nm. The greenness of the methods was estimated using an eco-scale tool where the presented method was found to be excellent green with an ecoscore of 84 based on spectrophotometric determination. Also, the greenness of the method was assessed by the Green Analytical Procedure Index and found to be eco-friendly. The method was validated in conformance with ICH guidelines, with acceptable values for linearity, accuracy, precision, LOD, and LOQ. The linearity range for zinc sulphate was 5-25 μg mL-1 with an R 2 value of 0.996. The % RSD for intraday precision and interday precision was less than 2%. The suggested method can be employed for the economic analysis of zinc in its pure form and various formulations. The presented spectrophotometric method is the first analytical method for the analysis of zinc present in zinc sulphate and showed greater ecoscale as compared to the official method.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35502194 PMCID: PMC9056243 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8520432
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Anal Chem ISSN: 1687-8760 Impact factor: 1.698
Figure 1(a, b) Dried powder and solution of natural reagent Acacia catechu.
Figure 2Formation of colour complex.
Optimization of reagent volume.
| Volume of reagent (mL) | Absorbance |
|---|---|
| 2 | 0.224 |
| 3 | 0.268 |
| 4 | 0.291 |
| 5 | 0.331 |
| 6 | 0.281 |
Stability of colour complex.
| Time (hours) | Absorbance |
|---|---|
| 1 | 0.522 |
| 2 | 0.492 |
| 3 | 0.438 |
| 4 | 0.412 |
| 5 | 0.408 |
| 6 | 0.402 |
| 7 | 0.268 |
Selection of pH.
| pH | Absorbance |
|---|---|
| 3.7 | 0.104 |
| 4 | 0.202 |
| 4.6 | 0.222 |
| 5 | 0.318 |
| 6 | 0.231 |
Phytochemical screening of Acacia catechu.
| Phytochemical test | Test performed | Inferences | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alkaliods | Mayer's test | Pale yellow ppt | + |
| Wagner's test | Brown ppt | + | |
| Flavanoids | Alkaline reagent test | Intense yellow colour | − |
| Lead acetate test | Yellow colour ppt | − | |
| Tannins | Ferric chloride test | Brownish green | + |
| Phenol | Blue, green, red, or purple color | + | |
| Glycosides | Keller Killiani test | Blue colour in acetic lyarer | − |
| Legal test | Blood red colour | − |
Note. “+” sign indicates the presence, and “−” sign indicates the absence of phytochemical.
Figure 3Calibration curve for gallic acid.
Figure 4Calibration curve of zinc sulphate.
Intraday and interday precision.
| S.No. | Amount ( | Intraday absorbance ( | Interday absorbance ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amount found | % RSD | Amount found | % RSD | ||
| 1 | 6 | 0.305 ± 0.005 | 1.31 | 0.305 ± 0.005 | 1.69 |
| 2 | 9 | 0.343 ± 0.005 | 1.31 | 0.343 ± 0.005 | 1.29 |
| 3 | 12 | 0.382 ± 0.006 | 1.46 | 0.382 ± 0.006 | 1.56 |
Accuracy for zinc sulphate.
| S.No. | Name of the drug | Amount of drug ( | Recovery level (%) | Amount of drug added ( | Amount found | % Recovery ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Zinc sulphate | 9 | 80 | 7.2 | 16.06 ± 0.25 | 99.00 |
| 100 | 9 | 17.85 ± 0.13 | 99.16 | |||
| 120 | 10.8 | 19.75 ± 0.23 | 99.74 |
Assay for zinc sulphate.
| S.No | Formulationa | Labelled claim (mg) | Amount found (Mean ± SD) | Assay (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Tablet-1 | 10 | 8.95 ± 0.05 | 99.44 |
| 2. | Tablet-2 | 10 | 9.09 ± 0.05 | 100.55 |
| 3. | Tablet-3 | 20 | 9.033 ± 0.07 | 100.36 |
| 4. | Tablet-4 | 20 | 9.2 ± 0.05 | 101.89 |
aTablet-1 to Tablet-4 are four marketed formulations from different companies.
Penalty points for the determination of zinc by proposed spectrophotometric method and the official complexometry method [32].
| Reagent/instruments | Penalty points | |
|---|---|---|
| Proposed spectrophotometric method | Official complexometry method | |
| HCl | 4 | − |
| Sodium EDTA | − | 6 |
| Sodium hydroxide | 2 | − |
| Acetic acid | − | 8 |
| Sodium chloride | 2 | − |
| Hexamine | − | 4 |
| Ferric chloride | 2 | − |
| Sodium carbonate | 0 | 2 |
| Water | 0 | 0 |
| Ammonia solution | 0 | 6 |
| Phosphate buffer | 0 | − |
| Occupational hazards | 0 | 0 |
| Waste | 6 | 8 |
| Instruments energy | 0 | 0 |
| Total penalty points | Σ16 | Σ34 |
| Analytical ecoscale total score | 84 | 66 |
|
| ||
| Comment | Excellent green analytical method | Fair green analytical method |
Assessment of GAPI for the proposed method.
| S.No. | Category | Proposed method | Colour |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | Sample preparation | ||
| 1 | Collection | UV | Green |
| 2 | Preservation | None | Green |
| 3 | Transport | None | Green |
| 4 | Storage | None | Green |
| 5 | Type of method: direct or indirect | Simple procedures | Yellow |
| 6 | Scale of extraction | Simple extraction using water | Green |
| 7 | Solvents/reagents used | Green solvents | Yellow |
| 8 | Additional treatments | None | Green |
| 9 | Reagent and solvents amount | <10 mL | Green |
| 10 | Health hazard | HCl and NaOH | Yellow |
| 11 | Safety hazard | HCl and NaOH were used very less so that flammability will be negligible. | Green |
|
| |||
| II | Instrumentation | ||
| 12 | Energy | UV consumes ≤0.1 kWh per sample | Green |
| 13 | Occupational hazard (OH) | None | Green |
| 14 | Waste | Waste generated by the proposed method were 1–10 mL. | Yellow |
| 15 | Waste treatment | Low degradation | Yellow |
Additional mark: quantification ring in the middle of GAPI: procedure for quantification.
Figure 5Assessment of proposed method by GAPI.