Literature DB >> 35501676

The efficacy of different alveolar recruitment maneuvers in holmium laser lithotripsy surgery under general anesthesia using a laryngeal mask.

Fu-Rong Bai1, Hong-Mei Li1, Ming-Liang Yi1, Hong Yin1, Wei Wu2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARMs) is an important part of lung-protective ventilation strategies (LPVSs), but the optimal duration and interval Remain unclear.
METHODS: Patients:252 patients who underwent holmium laser lithotripsy surgery and meet inclusion criteria were included and randomized into three groups based on the duration and frequency of ARMs (Regular, one 30 s ARM (RARMs); Improved and intermittent, three 10s ARMs (IARMs); and Control (C), no ARMs).
INTERVENTIONS: Groups R and I received ARMs at 20 cmH2O pressures every 30 min. All patients received the same anesthesia and mechanical ventilation. MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes included heart rate and mean arterial pressure changes during ARMs and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) within the first 7 postoperative days. MAIN
RESULTS: Incidences of PPCs in groups R(7.1%) and I (5.0%)were slightly lower than those in group C (8.9%).This indicated the potential to reduce lung injury. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure fluctuations during ARMs were significantly higher in groups R and I than in group C (P < 0.01). The rate of blood pressure decrease was significantly higher in group R than in group I (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: IARMs can reduce cycle fluctuations than RARMs in patients Undergoing holmium laser lithotripsy surgery with laryngeal mask general anesthesia. Low tidal volume ventilation and low PEEP combined with ARM did not significantly reduce the incidence of PPCs in healthy lung patients, but tended to reduce lung injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. ( ChiCTR2000030815 ,15/03/2020). This study was approved by the ethics committee of Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital with approval number(2020-005(Study)-1).
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alveolar recruitment maneuvers; Laryngeal mask; Lung protective ventilation strategy; Postoperative pulmonary complications

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35501676      PMCID: PMC9063066          DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01664-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol        ISSN: 1471-2253            Impact factor:   2.217


Background

With the development of comfort medicine and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), the application of laryngeal mask general anesthesia in ureteral calculi holmium laser lithotripsy has been widely used in China. Usually, the calculi move with respiration, leading to interference with surgery; to reduce the interference, the anesthesiologist often needs to reduce the tidal volume or briefly stop breathing during the operation. Although such respiratory management can effectively reduce the impact of breathing movement during surgery, it may also increase postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) such as hypoxemia, atelectasis, and hypercapnia [1, 2]. PPCs cause considerable harm to patients and are the main cause of related complications [3]. Studies have shown that lung protective ventilation strategies (LPVS) can improve postoperative lung function and reduce the incidence of PPCs in patients undergoing surgery,it include low tidal volume ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), pulmonary re-extension, low inhaled oxygen concentrations, and permissible hypercapnia [4-6]. Low tidal volume ventilation can lead to atelectasis [2]; however, collapsed alveoli can be reversed by ARM [7], and appropriate PEEP can maintain open alveoli [8]. There is currently no standard for the duration of ARM, with prior procedures using durations of 10 to 50 s at different pressures [9-13]. Similarly, the use of laryngeal mask anesthesia for lung protection has rarely been studied. We hypothesized that patients undergoing laryngeal mask general anesthesia employed IARMs was safer and would reduce the incidence of PPCs.

Methods

Participants

The study was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000030815,15/03/20). This study was approved by the ethics committee of Chengdu Fifth People’s Hospital with approval number(2020–005(Study)-1). The subject participant provided written consent. All methods were carried out in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Risk and benefits were discussed with patients and relatives, and informed consent forms were obtained from all participants prior to enrollment. 252 participants were selected from 653 participants for scheduled transurethral ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy with general Anesthesia from April 2020 to December 2020. Inclusion criteria were age 18 to 65 years with ASA Class I–III, a BMI of 18–30 kg/m2, an expected operation time of 1–3 h, and no contraindications to laryngeal mask placement. Exclusion Criteria were a history of surgery or invasive mechanical ventilation within 2 weeks, respiratory failure or sepsis, heart failure, liver and kidney insufficiency,pregnancy, alcohol abuse, morphine addiction, and mental system disorders. Withdraw Criteria were Laryngeal mask factor (experienced anesthesiologist failed to place 3 times,laryngeal mask leakage caused by various intraoperative factors), Surgery has changed,the experimental operation was not carried out for various reasons. Patients were randomized into three groups based on random numbers: One 30s ARM interval (Regular group, R, n = 84), three 10 s ARM intervals (Improved group, I, n = 84), and no ARM (Control group, C, n = 84). The random numbers were generated by a computer and randomly divided into three groups in a ratio of 1:1:1 into opaque, sealed envelopes, which were then passed by a non-participant investigator to the anesthesiologist, who administered the anesthetic for patients. People including investigators, patients, staff in the ward and postoperative care units (PACU)) were unaware of the grouping. Postoperatively,all data were obtained by investigators who did not know the groups.

Anesthesia protocol

All patients fasted for 8 to 12 h prior to general anesthesia, and no preoperative medication was administered. Upper extremity intravenous (IV) access was established, and 5–10 ml/kg crystalloids were administered before anesthesia. Echocardiography (ECG), heart rate (HR), non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP), oxygen saturation (SpO2), and EtCO2 were monitored. A radial artery puncture catheter was placed under local anesthesia to monitor intraoperative arterial pressure and harvest samples for blood gas analysis. Anesthesia was induced by administering midazolam (0.03 mg/kg), sufentanil (0.3 ug/kg), propofol (1–1.5 mg/kg), and cisatracurium (0.15 mg/kg). Laryngeal masks were selected based on weight: size 3 for <50 kg, size 4 for 50–70 kg, and size 5 for >70 kg. Mechanical ventilation was established after the oral insertion of the laryngeal mask. Sevoflurane was inhaled for sedation, and remifentanil maintenance infusion rate of 0.05 ~ 0.1 μg kg − 1 min − 1 for anesthesia maintenance. The Bispect ral index (BIS) value was maintained between 40–60 s, the average arterial pressure (MAP) was maintained between 70–100 mmHg, and HR was maintained between 50–100 beats per minute (bpm).Ringer’s fluid was instilled intravenously (5–10 ml/kg/h) to maintain body fluids. A blood transfusion was considered for blood loss >30% of the total blood volume or a hemoglobin level < 7 g/dl; otherwise, colloidal fluid was used to replace the volume of blood lost. All anesthetics were ceased after the double-J tube was placed. The laryngeal mask was removed when spontaneous breathing and swallowing reflexes were reestablished, normal tidal volume was recovered, and patients responded to verbal commands with their eyes open. The patient was transported back to the recovery ward after complete awakening, and all vital signs were normal.

Mechanical ventilation protocol

A tidal volume of 6 ml/kg, respiratory frequency of 12–18 breaths per minute, inspiration to expiration ratio of 1:2, and PEEP of 5 cmH2O were used in all groups. All patients were administered 50% oxygen at 2 L/min total flow, and respiratory rates were adjusted to maintain PaCO2 at 35–45 mmHg. Groups R and I received ARM every 30 min during surgery, whereas Group C did not receive ARM. ARMs were conducted by adjusting the pressure valve to 20 cmH2O, followed by adjusting the manually controlled breathing valve, and squeezing the air bag to maintain airway pressure. If the cyclic fluctuation during the period of the ARM exceeds 20% before ARM, the test will be terminated.

Outcomes

Primary outcomes included the incidence of PPCs within days, and changes in heart rate and mean arterial pressure during ARM. Secondary outcomes included the duration of postoperative hospital stay, patient satisfaction, and postoperative mortality within 30 days. We also recorded the mechanical ventilation duration and extubation time (from the end of the operation to the time of laryngeal mask removal), and analyzed arterial blood gases and airway peak pressure at T1 (preoperative), T2 (1 h after ventilation), and T3 (postoperative). We monitored postoperative symptoms including cough, expectoration, lung auscultation, fever, and complications associated with laryngeal mask placement.

Sample size and statistical methods

We used the excellent effect test for multiple proportion (provided by the Power Analysis and Sample Size,PASS) to calculate the sample size. According to the literature data, the incidence of PPCs was between 5 and 50% in different types of surgery and 30% relative reduction in PPCs would have clinical significance. However, the incidence of this type of surgery is rarely reported, so, we assume that the incidence of PPCs in the control group was 30 and 15% in the experimental group R and 10% in the experimental group I,and proportion among the groups was 1:1:1. The estimated sample size was 68 per group,which provide 80% power, with two-sided level ofα = 0.05. Taking into account the dropout rate of 20%, so we planned to enroll 252 patients (84 for each group) in all. We analysed outcome data with SPSS version 26.0software.Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.Statistical description was provided for baseline data,such as age, sex, BMI, ASA, smoking status, Chest X - ray examination. The quantitative data with a normal distribution were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, data satisfying the homogeneity of variance were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Fisher’s least significant difference-t test (LSD-t test) was used for post hoc analysis. whereas non-parametric test were used for non- normally distributed. The categorical data were presented as the number (percentage) and used the chi-square test. The estimated sample size was 84 cases in each group, and the sample size was finally included in the analysis (56, 60, 67). The reasons for some patients not included in the analysis were as follows: Duration of surgery<1 h;Laryngeal mask placement failed and was replaced with endotracheal intubation;Surgery has changed;the experimental operation was not carried out for various reasons;the experimental operation was not carried out for various reasons. If these patients were included in the analysis, it would affect the accuracy of our main outcome. Therefore, these patients were not included and we compared the dropout rates among the three groups, Chi-square test was performed and there was no significant difference (P = 0.156).

Results

Patients characteristics

Two hundred fifty two patients were randomized,following assessment with exclusion criteria, 183 individuals were included in the analysis (Fig. 1). There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups in terms of sex, age, body mass index (BMI), ASA class, history of smoking, and preoperative chest X-ray characteristics (Table 1).
Fig. 1

Flow diagram

Table 1

Preoperative baseline characteristics of 252 patients

IndicatorR Group (n = 84)I Group (n = 84)C Group (n = 84)F/χ2valuep value
Age (year; mean ± SD)42.40 ± 13.3743.87 ± 13.8541.08 ± 13.240.8920.409a
Male [n(%)]66 (78.5)64 (76.2)65 (77.3)0.1360.934b
BMI (kg/m2; mean ± SD)22.20 ± 2.8822.51 ± 2.8822.73 ± 2.740.7640.485a
ASA-II [n(%)]36 (42.9)41 (48.8)42 (50.0)0.9870.61b
Smoking [n(%)]35 (41.6)43 (51.1)37 (44.1)1.6630.435b
Abnormal Chest X-ray [n(%)]43 (51.2)50 (59.5)48 (57.1)1.2560.486b

Legend: BMI Body Mass Index, ASA-II American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification-II, a One-way ANOVA test, b Chi-square test

Flow diagram Preoperative baseline characteristics of 252 patients Legend: BMI Body Mass Index, ASA-II American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification-II, a One-way ANOVA test, b Chi-square test

Changes of the circulatory system

The decrease in mean arterial pressure was significantly higher in group R than in group I (6.18 ± 4.10 mmHg vs. 4.47 ± 3.35 mmHg, p < 0.01). Heart rate fluctuations during ARM has no significant difference between groupR and groupI (3.21 ± 2.15 bpm vs 3.07 ± 1.81 bpm, P = 0.114). Fluctuations in heart rate and blood pressure were not obvious in group C because ARMs were not performed, and the changes in heart rate and mean arterial pressure were significantly higher in groups R and I than in group C (P < 0.01). These results are presented in Table 2 and Fig. 2.
Table 2

Cardiovascular system changes during ARM in the 3 groups

IndicatorRgoup(n = 56)Igoup (n = 60)Cgoup (n = 67)FP
Mean arterial pressure Decline in value (mmHg)6.18 ± 4.104.47 ± 3.35a1.93 ± 1.71ab28.618P<0.001

Heart rate fluctuation value

(bpm)

3.21 ± 2.153.07 ± 1.81c1.51 ± 1.11ab19.283P<0.001

One-way ANOVA test and LSD test was used

Legend: aCompared with group R, P < 0.05;

bcompared with group I, P < 0.05,

cCompared with group R, P = 0.644

Fig. 2

Cardiovascular system changes during ARM in the 3 groups Legend:“*“Comparison between the two groups, P < 0.05

Cardiovascular system changes during ARM in the 3 groups Heart rate fluctuation value (bpm) One-way ANOVA test and LSD test was used Legend: aCompared with group R, P < 0.05; bcompared with group I, P < 0.05, cCompared with group R, P = 0.644 Cardiovascular system changes during ARM in the 3 groups Legend:“*“Comparison between the two groups, P < 0.05

Postoperative follow-up and PPCs within the first 7 days after surgery

Thirteen patients developed PPCs (7.1%); four occurred in group R (7.1%), three occurred in group I (5.0%), and six occurred in group C (8.9%). The incidence of PPCs was slightly higher in group C than in groups R and I, but there was no significant difference in PPCs between groups (P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with respect to complications of laryngeal mask placement and days in hospital. No deaths occurred during hospitalization (Table 3).
Table 3

Outcomes within the first 7 days after surgery 

IndicatorRgroup(n = 56)Igroup(n = 60)Cgroup(n = 67)F/χ2valuep value
PPCs [n(%)]4 (7.14)3 (5.00)6 (8.95)0.7510.687a
Pneumonia [n(%)]2 (3.57)1 (1.66)1 (1.49)0.7290.694a
atelectasis [n(%)]1 (1.78)1 (1.66)2 (2.98)0.3180.853a
hyoxemia [n(%)]1 (1.78)1 (1.66)3 (4.47)1.2130.545a
Laryngeal mask related complications [n(%)]
 Voice hoarse2 (3.5)2 (3.3)2 (2.9)0.0340.983a
 Sore throat6 (10.7)7 (11.6)6 (8.9)0.2600.878a
 Mucosal hemorrhage5 (8.9)4 (6.6)4 (5.9)0.4300.806a
 Cough3 (5.3)4 (6.6)3 (4.5)0.2950.863a
 fever5 (8.9)6 (10.0)6 (8.9)0.0530.974a
Postoperative complications [n(%)]
 Abnormal auscultation of the lungs1 (1.7)1 (1.6)2 (2.9)0.3180.853a
Patient satisfaction [n(%)]
 Satisfied45 (80.3)47 (78.3)56 (83.5)0.5790.749a
 Postoperative hospital stay (day)3.52 ± 1.213.48 ± 1.423.56 ± 1.370.0520.974b

There was no significant difference among the three groups in the above indicators

aChi-square test,

bOne-way ANOVA test

Outcomes within the first 7 days after surgery There was no significant difference among the three groups in the above indicators aChi-square test, bOne-way ANOVA test

Other outcomes

There were no statistically significant differences among the groups with respect to intraoperative fluid administration or loss of body fluids, mechanical ventilation duration, or extubation time (Table S1). There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups in terms of airway peak pressure or arterial blood gas analyses of PH, Oxygenation index (OI), and PaCO2 at T1, T2, and T3 (Table S2).

Discussion

Although there was no statistically significant improvement in PPCs after ARM, the incidence was lower in the improved group, indicating the potential to reduce lung injury. This result requires further confirmation in clinical studies with larger sample sizes. Nonetheless, the incidence of PPCs was lower than previously reported in the Literatures [14-17]. This could be attributed to the small sample size, differences in inclusion criteria, with the prior LPVS trials including patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [18, 19], elderly patients [20], and patients undergoing thoracic surgery [21], versus the healthy lung patients in this study. Additionally, it is possible that the duration of mechanical ventilation was insufficient. In order to reduce retrograde infection, urethral injury, and water poisoning, the operation time for this type of surgery is typically less than 2 h in our hospital, meaning the mechanical ventilation duration is generally not more than 3 h. Fourth, diagnostic criteria may differ. In this study, intermittent ARM (IARM) had less influence on circulation than continuous ARM. In clinical practice, intermittent ARM may be safer, but certain patients need to more time to open alveoli, including obese patients and patients undergoing thoracoscopic or laparoscopic procedures. Studies have shownthat the laryngeal mask has a protective effect on the lungs [22, 23]. The laryngeal mask is a supraglottic ventilation device that widely used in short operations and emergency airway rescue because it is simple to operate, has small injury risks, Does not require special positioning,and has good patient tolerance [23, 24]. The third-generation double-tube laryngeal mask used in this study includes a gastric tube, which greatly improves its effectiveness and safety. The laryngeal mask was successfully placed after anesthesia in 94% of patients, and there were no statistically significant differences in the number of complications associated with laryngeal mask placement and removal among the three groups. The application of LPVS in this study included selection of an optimal tidal volume. The tidal volume should be chosen based on comprehensive consideration of patients’ lung function, lung compliance, thoracic compliance, and functional residual gas, and the tidal volume is calculated based on the patient’s predicted body weight (PBW) [25-27]. Excessive tidal volume can lead to excessive expansion of the alveoli and cause "volume injury" [26]. Excessive tidal volume also increases airway pressure, the possibility of gas entering the stomach, and air leakage. However,a low tidal volume can lead to insufficient ventilation resulting in atelectasis, ventilation/blood flow disorders, and respiratory acidosis [2]. Consensus among experts recommends a tidal volume of 6–8 mL/kg PBW, which was consistent with the tidal volume used in this study. Additionally, PEEP can maintain the alveoli in the open state during ventilation, and improve oxygen and pulmonary compliance. Prior research indicates that PEEP ≥5 cmH2O can improve lung compliance, enhance patient oxygenation, and reduce the occurrence of PPCs [8]. Compared with PEEP ≤2 cmH2O, PEEP >12 cmH2O increased the risk of increased peak airway pressure and hemodynamic fluctuations [28]. Experts recommend at least 5 cmH2O, which was used in our study. Alveolar recruitment maneuvers performed at 30-min intraoperative intervals have been shown to improve trans-pulmonary pressure, reopen collapsed alveoli caused by insufficient ventilation, improve oxygen and lung compliance, and reduce the mortality of ARDS patients [29] .If the systolic blood pressure is less than 80 mmHg, or arrhythmia occurs, the ARM should be terminated [18]. There are several limitations associated with this study. It was a single-center study, with a small sample size, and only included healthy lung patients. Additionally, there was no comparison to other ventilation modalities, and strategies for perioperative lung protection should be multifactorial. The effectiveness of LPVS on PPCs was only assessed using one set of variables. A multicenter study with a substantially larger sample size is required to confirm our findings.

Conclusions

In conclusion, Low tidal volume ventilation and low PEEP combined with ARM did not significantly reduce the incidence of PPCs in healthy lung patients, but tended to reduce lung injury. IARMs can reduce cycle fluctuations than RARMs in patients Undergoing holmium laser lithotripsy surgery with laryngeal mask general anesthesia. Additional file 1: Table S1. Mechanical ventilation duration or extubation time. Additional file 2: Table S2. Intraoperative ventilation indexes of patients in three groups.
  20 in total

1.  A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Emmanuel Futier; Jean-Michel Constantin; Catherine Paugam-Burtz; Julien Pascal; Mathilde Eurin; Arthur Neuschwander; Emmanuel Marret; Marc Beaussier; Christophe Gutton; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Bernard Allaouchiche; Daniel Verzilli; Marc Leone; Audrey De Jong; Jean-Etienne Bazin; Bruno Pereira; Samir Jaber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Comparative Effectiveness of Protective Ventilation Strategies for Moderate and Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sachin Sud; Jan O Friedrich; Neill K J Adhikari; Eddy Fan; Niall D Ferguson; Gordon Guyatt; Maureen O Meade
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Standardizing Predicted Body Weight Equations for Mechanical Ventilation Tidal Volume Settings.

Authors:  Olinto Linares-Perdomo; Thomas D East; Roy Brower; Alan H Morris
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Lung protective ventilation strategy to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A randomized double blinded clinical trial.

Authors:  Dan Huang; Shujing Zhou; Zhangjie Yu; Jie Chen; Hong Xie
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 9.452

5.  Low-pressure pulmonary recruitment maneuver: equal to or worse than moderate-pressure pulmonary recruitment maneuver in preventing postlaparoscopic shoulder pain? A randomized controlled trial of 72 patients.

Authors:  Gulseren Yilmaz; Huseyin Kiyak; Aysu Akca; Ziya Salihoglu
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 1.195

6.  Recruitment manoeuvres for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome receiving mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hanyujie Kang; Huqin Yang; Zhaohui Tong
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.425

7.  Comparison of low and high inspiratory oxygen fraction added to lung-protective ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xue-Fei Li; Dan Jiang; Yu-Lian Jiang; Hong Yu; Meng-Qiu Zhang; Jia-Li Jiang; Lei-Lei He; Hai Yu
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 9.452

8.  Differential Effects of Intraoperative Positive End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP) on Respiratory Outcome in Major Abdominal Surgery Versus Craniotomy.

Authors:  Myrthe A C de Jong; Karim S Ladha; Marcos F Vidal Melo; Anne Kathrine Staehr-Rye; Edward A Bittner; Tobias Kurth; Matthias Eikermann
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Better Hemodynamic Profile of Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion Compared to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation.

Authors:  Hashem Jarineshin; Saeed Kashani; Majid Vatankhah; Alireza Abdulahzade Baghaee; Sahar Sattari; Fereydoon Fekrat
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 0.611

10.  Effect of the "Recruitment" Maneuver on Respiratory Mechanics in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery.

Authors:  Ismail Sümer; Ufuk Topuz; Selçuk Alver; Tarik Umutoglu; Mefkur Bakan; Seniyye Ülgen Zengin; Halil Coşkun; Ziya Salihoglu
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.129

View more
  1 in total

1.  The effects of laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube on atelectasis in patients undergoing general anesthesia assessed by lung ultrasound: A protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xuebin Li; Bin Liu; Yaxin Wang; Wei Xiong; Yuan Zhang; Di Bao; Yi Liang; Ling Li; Gaifen Liu; Xu Jin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.