Literature DB >> 35501556

Partial reinforcement effects on acquisition and extinction of a conditioned taste aversion.

Mark E Bouton1, Noelle L Michaud2.   

Abstract

Four experiments with rat subjects asked whether a partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE) occurs in taste aversion learning. The question has received little attention in the literature, and to our knowledge no taste aversion experiment has previously demonstrated a PREE. In each of the present experiments, experimental groups received a taste mixed in drinking water for 20 min; such taste exposures were sometimes paired with a lithium chloride (LiCl) injection and sometimes not. Control groups received only taste-LiCl pairings. There was evidence that each reinforced and non-reinforced trial produced increments and decrements in aversion strength (respectively), and trials mattered more than accumulated time during the conditioned stimulus and during the background (as emphasized in time-accumulation models like those of Gallistel and Gibbon, Psychological Review, 107, 289-344, 2000, and Gibbon and Balsam, Autoshaping and conditioning theory, Academic Press, New York, pp. 219-235, 1981). In addition, a partial reinforcement extinction effect was observed when there was a relatively large number of conditioning trials. The results extend our understanding of extinction in taste aversion learning and provide more evidence that aversion learning might follow rules that are qualitatively similar to those of other forms of learning.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acquisition; Biological constraints on learning; Extinction; Taste aversion learning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35501556     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-022-00523-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.926


  13 in total

Review 1.  Time, rate, and conditioning.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; J Gibbon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Importance of trials versus accumulating time across trials in partially reinforced appetitive conditioning.

Authors:  Mark E Bouton; Ceyhun Sunsay
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2003-01

3.  Conditioned aversion to saccharin resulting from exposure to gamma radiation.

Authors:  J GARCIA; D J KIMELDORF; R A KOELLING
Journal:  Science       Date:  1955-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations.

Authors:  A AMSEL
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1958-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Analysis of the microstructure of the rhythmic tongue movements of rats ingesting maltose and sucrose solutions.

Authors:  J D Davis; G P Smith
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Bisection of temporal intervals.

Authors:  R M Church; M Z Deluty
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1977-07

7.  A general theory of aversion learning.

Authors:  J Garcia; P S Lasiter; F Bermudez-Rattoni; D A Deems
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Separation of time-based and trial-based accounts of the partial reinforcement extinction effect.

Authors:  Mark E Bouton; Amanda M Woods; Travis P Todd
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Reduced palatability in lithium- and activity-based, but not in amphetamine-based, taste aversion learning.

Authors:  Dominic M Dwyer; Robert A Boakes; Andrew J Hayward
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 10.  BEHAVIORAL AND NEUROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF PAVLOVIAN AND INSTRUMENTAL EXTINCTION LEARNING.

Authors:  Mark E Bouton; Stephen Maren; Gavan P McNally
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 37.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.