Literature DB >> 35501394

Immunohistological study of the density and distribution of human penile neural tissue: gradient hypothesis.

Alfonso Cepeda-Emiliani1, Marina Gándara-Cortés2,3, María Otero-Alén4, Heidy García5, Juan Suárez-Quintanilla2, Tomás García-Caballero2,3, Rosalía Gallego2, Lucía García-Caballero2.   

Abstract

Immunohistological patterns of density and distribution of neural tissue in the human penis, including the prepuce, are not fully characterized, and effects of circumcision (partial or total removal of the penile prepuce) on penile sexual sensation are controversial. This study analyzed extra- and intracavernosal innervation patterns on the main penile axes using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human adult and fetal penile tissues, single- and double-staining immunohistochemistry and a variety of neural and non-neural markers, with a special emphasis on the prepuce and potential sexual effects of circumcision. Immunohistochemical profiles of neural structures were determined and the most detailed immunohistological characterizations to date of preputial nerve supply are provided. The penile prepuce has a highly organized, dense, afferent innervation pattern that is manifest early in fetal development. Autonomically, it receives noradrenergic sympathetic and nitrergic parasympathetic innervation. Cholinergic nerves are also present. We observed cutaneous and subcutaneous neural density distribution biases across our specimens towards the ventral prepuce, including a region corresponding in the adult anatomical position (penis erect) to the distal third of the ventral penile aspect. We also describe a concept of innervation gradients across the longitudinal and transverse penile axes. Results are discussed in relation to the specialized literature. An argument is made that neuroanatomic substrates underlying unusual permanent penile sensory disturbances post-circumcision are related to heightened neural levels in the distal third of the ventral penile aspect, which could potentially be compromised by deep incisions during circumcision.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35501394     DOI: 10.1038/s41443-022-00561-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Impot Res        ISSN: 0955-9930            Impact factor:   2.408


  59 in total

1.  A preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood.

Authors:  T Hammond
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  The effect of male circumcision on sexuality.

Authors:  Daisik Kim; Myung-Geol Pang
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  Effects of circumcision on male sexual functions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ye Tian; Wei Liu; Jian-Zhong Wang; Romel Wazir; Xuan Yue; Kun-Jie Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Male circumcision and sexual function in men and women: a survey-based, cross-sectional study in Denmark.

Authors:  Morten Frisch; Morten Lindholm; Morten Grønbæk
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Antecedents of Emotional Distress and Sexual Dissatisfaction in Circumcised Men: Previous Findings and Future Directions-Comment on Bossio and Pukall (2017).

Authors:  Tim Hammond; Mark D Reiss
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2018-03-02

6.  Adult circumcision outcomes study: effect on erectile function, penile sensitivity, sexual activity and satisfaction.

Authors:  Kenneth S Fink; Culley C Carson; Robert F DeVellis
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  The role of genital nerve afferents in the physiology of the sexual response and pelvic floor function.

Authors:  Kambiz Tajkarimi; Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Penile sensitivity and sexual satisfaction after circumcision: are we informing men correctly?

Authors:  S Masood; H R H Patel; R C Himpson; J H Palmer; G R Mufti; M K M Sheriff
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Male circumcision decreases penile sensitivity as measured in a large cohort.

Authors:  Guy A Bronselaer; Justine M Schober; Heino F L Meyer-Bahlburg; Guy T'Sjoen; Robert Vlietinck; Piet B Hoebeke
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Adult circumcision and male sexual health: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  J Dias; R Freitas; R Amorim; P Espiridião; L Xambre; L Ferraz
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 2.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.