Literature DB >> 35501131

Transposable element accumulation drives size differences among polymorphic Y Chromosomes in Drosophila.

Alison H Nguyen1, Weixiang Wang1, Emily Chong1, Kamalakar Chatla1, Doris Bachtrog1.   

Abstract

Y Chromosomes of many species are gene poor and show low levels of nucleotide variation, yet they often display high amounts of structural diversity. Dobzhansky cataloged several morphologically distinct Y Chromosomes in Drosophila pseudoobscura that differ in size and shape, but the molecular causes of their large size differences are unclear. Here we use cytogenetics and long-read sequencing to study the sequence content of polymorphic Y Chromosomes in D. pseudoobscura We show that Y Chromosomes differ almost twofold in size, ranging from 30 to 60 Mb. Most of this size difference is caused by a handful of active transposable elements (TEs) that have recently expanded on the largest Y Chromosome, with different elements being responsible for Y expansion on differently sized D. pseudoobscura Y's. We show that Y Chromosomes differ in their heterochromatin enrichment and expression of Y-enriched TEs, and also influence expression of dozens of autosomal and X-linked genes. The same helitron element that showed the most drastic amplification on the largest Y in D. pseudoobscura independently amplified on a polymorphic large Y Chromosome in Drosophila affinis, suggesting that some TEs are inherently more prone to become deregulated on Y Chromosomes.
© 2022 Nguyen et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35501131      PMCID: PMC9248874          DOI: 10.1101/gr.275996.121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.438


  69 in total

Review 1.  The degeneration of Y chromosomes.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; D Charlesworth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features.

Authors:  Yang Liao; Gordon K Smyth; Wei Shi
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  Heng Li
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Y chromosome of D. pseudoobscura is not homologous to the ancestral Drosophila Y.

Authors:  Antonio Bernardo Carvalho; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Y-chromosome evolution: emerging insights into processes of Y-chromosome degeneration.

Authors:  Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Evidence that intergenic spacer repeats of Drosophila melanogaster rRNA genes function as X-Y pairing sites in male meiosis, and a general model for achiasmatic pairing.

Authors:  B D McKee; L Habera; J A Vrana
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Chromatin Architectural Changes during Cellular Senescence and Aging.

Authors:  Luyang Sun; Ruofan Yu; Weiwei Dang
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Expansion of a single transposable element family is associated with genome-size increase and radiation in the genus Hydra.

Authors:  Wai Yee Wong; Oleg Simakov; Diane M Bridge; Paulyn Cartwright; Anthony J Bellantuono; Anne Kuhn; Thomas W Holstein; Charles N David; Robert E Steele; Daniel E Martínez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 12.779

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.