Literature DB >> 35500892

Molecular Markers for Sulfadoxine/Pyrimethamine and Chloroquine Resistance in Plasmodium falciparum in Thailand.

Jiraporn Kuesap1, Nutnicha Suphakhonchuwong1, Lertluk Kalawong1, Natthaya Khumchum1.   

Abstract

Drug resistance is an important problem hindering malaria elimination in tropical areas. Point mutations in Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase (Pfdhfr) and dihydropteroate synthase (Pfdhps) genes confer resistance to antifolate drug, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) while P. falciparum chloroquine-resistant transporter (Pfcrt) genes caused resistance to chloroquine (CQ). Decline in Pfdhfr/Pfdhps and Pfcrt mutations after withdrawal of SP and CQ has been reported. The aim of present study was to investigate the prevalence of Pfdhfr, Pfdhps, and Pfcrt mutation from 2 endemic areas of Thailand. All of 200 blood samples collected from western area (Thai-Myanmar) and southern area (Thai-Malaysian) contained multiple mutations in Pfdhfr and Pfdhps genes. The most prevalent haplotypes for Pfdhfr and Pfdhps were quadruple and double mutations, respectively. The quadruple and triple mutations of Pfdhfr and Pfdhps were common in western samples, whereas low frequency of triple and double mutations was found in southern samples, respectively. The Pfcrt 76T mutation was present in all samples examined. Malaria isolated from 2 different endemic regions of Thailand had high mutation rates in the Pfdhfr, Pfdhps, and Pfcrt genes. These findings highlighted the fixation of mutant alleles causing resistance of SP and CQ in this area. It is necessary to monitor the re-emergence of SP and CQ sensitive parasites in this area.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Plasmodium falciparum; chloroquine-resistant transporter; dihydrofolate reductase; dihydropteroate synthase; molecular marker

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35500892      PMCID: PMC9058275          DOI: 10.3347/kjp.2022.60.2.109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Parasitol        ISSN: 0023-4001            Impact factor:   1.776


INTRODUCTION

Although malaria is an ancient disease caused by Plasmodium parasite, it remains important to public health to present era. Plasmodium falciparum infection causes variable clinical symptoms ranging from asymptomatic to severe manifestations. The emergence of resistance of P. falciparum to the available antimalarial drugs is an important factor for malaria control [1]. In Thailand, resistance to many antimalarial drugs, including chloroquine (CQ), sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), mefloquine, and artemisinin has been reported [2,3]. CQ resistant P. falciparum was reported in the early 1960s [4,5]. In 1973, SP replaced CQ as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria due to widespread resistance [1,6], but after 10 years, SP was ineffective [1,7]. Then, mefloquine was introduced in 1985 and resistance emerged in the same decade [8]. Artemisinin-based combination therapy was introduced as first-line treatment in 1995 [9]. Molecular epidemiological investigation provides information for detecting the emergence and spread of antimalarial drug resistance. Mutations in the P. falciparum dihydrofolate reductase (Pfdhfr) and P. falciparum dihydropteroate synthase (Pfdhps) genes (at codons 51, 59, 108, and 164 of Pfdhfr and 437, 540, and 581 of Pfdhps) are associated with SP treatment failures [10,11]. The mutations in Pfdhfr and Pfdhps genes were staged, resulting in increased levels of SP drug resistance [12]. The P. falciparum CQ resistance transporter gene (Pfcrt) K76T mutation has been linked to P. falciparum CQ resistance [13]. In some countries, the withdrawal of CQ for P. falciparum treatment, Pfcrt mutation (K76T) gently decreased and disappeared completely [14-17]. Similar to withdrawal of SP for P. falciparum treatment, Pfdhfr and Pfdhps gene mutations also decreased in some countries [18-21]. Conversely, alleles conferring CQ and SP resistance still occur at high frequency after discontinuation of these drugs [22,23]. However, declining of Pfdhfr, Pfdhps, and Pfcrt mutations might be associated with duration of drug withdrawal and geographical differences. The objective of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of 5 Pfdhfr (A16V, N51I, C59R, S108N/T, and I164L), 5 Pfdhps (S436A, A437G, K540E, A581G, and A613S/T) and 1 Pfcrt (K76T) mutation from 2 different endemic areas of Thailand.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics approval

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Thammasat University (COA No. 134/2561). All patients were informed about the study objectives, sampling technique, and the benefits of the study. Informed consents were obtained according to the ethical standards from all patients.

Sample collection

A total of 200 dried blood spot samples were collected during 2007–2017 from patients with P. falciparum infection who attended malaria clinics in the western (Tak Province) and southern (Yala Province) regions along the Thai-Myanmar and Thai-Malaysian border, respectively.

Extraction of parasite genomic DNA

Genomic DNA of all blood samples was prepared using a QIAamp DNA extraction mini-kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, California, USA) according to manufacturer’s instruction and used as a template for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification.

Amplification and detection of the Pfdhfr and Pfdhps

Pfdhfr and Pfdhps genes were amplified by nested PCR using Pfdhfr and Pfdhps specific primers (Table 1) according to the previously described methods with some modification [24]. Briefly, the PCR was carried out with the following reaction mixture including 0.25 μM of each primer, 1.5 mM MgCl2 (Thermo scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA), 1×Taq buffered with KCl (Thermo scientific), 200 μM deoxynucleotides (dNTPs) (Bioline, London, UK), 2 μl of genomic DNA in the primary PCR, and 1 μl of primary PCR product in nested PCR and 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Thermo scientific). All of the PCR products were then analyzed on 1% agarose gel and visualized under UV illuminator. PCR products were digested with restriction enzymes (Table 1) [24] then the restriction fragments were analyzed on 1.2% agarose gel and visualized under UV illuminator.
Table 1

The primers and enzymes for genotyping of Pfdhfr, Pfdhps and Pfcrt genes

GenePCRPrimerPrimer sequence (5′ to 3′)RFLP positionRestrictionenzymePCR size (bp)Restriction product size (bp)

Wild typeMutation
Pfdhfr PrimaryM1TTTATGATGGAACAAGTCTGC
M5AGTATATACATCGCTAACAGA
SecondaryM3TTTATGATGGAACAAGTCTGCGACGTTA16VNlalll522376, 93, 53376, 146
(16, 51, 108, 164)F/AAATTCTTGATAAACAACGGAACCTTTTAN51IMluCI154, 120, 65, 55218, 120, 65, 55
S108TBstNI522181, 145
S108NBsrl522332, 190
I164LDraI245, 171, 107245, 143, 107, 27
SecondaryFGAAATGTAATTCCCTAGATATGGAATATTC59RXmnl326189, 137163, 137, 26
(59)M4TTAATTTCCCAAGTAAAACTATTAGAGCTTC

Pfdhps PrimaryR2AACCTAAACGTGCTGTTCAA
R/AATTGTGTGATTTGTCCACAA
SecondaryKTGCTAGTGTTATAGATATAGGATGAGCATCS436AMnlI438317, 121278, 121, 39
(436, 437, 540)K/CTATAACGAGGTATTGCATTTAATGCAAGAAA437GAvaII438404, 34
K540EFokI405, 33320, 85, 33
SecondaryLATAGGATACTATTTGATATTGGACCAGGATTCGA581GBslI161161128, 33
(581, 613)L/TATTACAACATTTTGATCATTCGCGCAACCGGA613SBsaWI161131, 30
A613TAgeI161128, 33

Pfcrt PrimaryCRTP1CCGTTAATAATAAATACACGCAG
CRTP2CGGATGTTACAAAACTATAGTTACC
SecondaryCRTD1TGTGCTCATGTGTTTAAACTTK76TApoI134100, 34134
CRTD2CAAAACTATAGTTACCAATTTTG

Amplification and detection of the Pfcrt

Amplification of K76T was performed by nested PCR using Pfcrt specific primers (Table 1) according to the previously described methods with some modification [25-27]. Briefly, the PCR was carried out with the following reaction mixture including 0.1 μM of each primer, 2.5 mM MgCl2 (Thermo scientific), 1×Taq buffered with KCl (Thermo scientific), 100 μM deoxynucleotides (dNTPs) (Bioline), 0.5 μl of genomic DNA in the primary PCR, and 0.5 μl of primary PCR product in nested PCR and 0.5 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Thermo scientific). All of the PCR products were then analyzed on 1.5% agarose gel and visualized under UV illuminator. PCR products were digested with restriction enzymes ApoI (New England Biolabs Inc., Hertfordshire, UK) (Table 1), as described by the manufacturer. Then the restriction fragments were analyzed on 2.0% agarose gel and visualized under UV illuminator.

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed by SPSS software version 21.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York, USA). The chi-square test was used to compare the frequencies and correlations of all data. The level of significance was set at P<0.05.

RESULTS

Analysis of Pfdhfr and Pfdhps mutations

A total of 200 P. falciparum samples were successfully amplified and analyzed for both the Pfdhfr and Pfdhps genes. The polymorphisms at each codon were demonstrated by restriction fragments (Fig. 1A, B). The frequencies of Pfdhfr and Pfdhps mutations was summarised in Table 2. All samples had at least 1 codon mutation in the Pfdhfr (A16V, N51I, C59R, S108N/T, and I164L) and Pfdhps (S436A, A437G, K540E, A581G, and A613S/T). Four codon mutations were detected in Pfdhfr (51I, 59R, 108N, and 164L) in samples from 2 areas. All isolates carried mutations at codon 59 and 108 in Pfdhfr. Four codon mutations were detected in Pfdhps (436A, 437G, 540E, and 581G) in samples from Tak Province, whereas 3 codon mutations were detected from Yala Province. All isolates carried wild-type alleles at codon 613 in Pfdhps. Mixed genotypes were detected in thirty isolates by codon 51 and 164 of Pfdhfr, and 436 and 540 of Pfdhps that were no processed further. There was no wildtype allele ANCSI, but 3 alleles (AIRNI, AIRNL, and ANRNL) of Pfdhfr were identified in this study (Table 3). AIRNL was the most prevalent allele (52.4%) in all P. falciparum isolates collected from Tak Province (88.9%) (Fig. 2). AIRNI was the most prevalent allele in P. falciparum isolates from Yala Province (80.9%). Statistical significance was found between 2 study areas (P<0.001). For Pfdhps, 6 alleles were identified (Table 3). SGKGA was the most prevalent allele (50.0%) found in P. falciparum isolates from Yala Province (83.1%). SGEGA was the most prevalent allele in P. falciparum isolates from Tak Province (70.4%). Statistical significance was found between 2 study areas (P<0.001). Eleven allele combination of Pfdhfr-Pfdhps were found in this study (Table 4). The quintuple mutation (AIRNI-SGKGA), which comprise triple mutations in Pfdhfr and 2 mutations in Pfdhps were found to be most prevalent in study population (35.3%) and in isolates from Yala Province (66.3%). The septuple mutation (AIRNL-SGEGA), which comprised quadruple mutations in Pfdhfr and 3 mutations in Pfdhps were most frequent in isolates from Tak Province (64.2%).
Fig. 1

The polymorphism of pfdhfr (A), pfdhps (B), and pfcrt (C) gene by gel electrophoresis. W-wildtype, M-mutant, S/N-serine/threonine, Mi-mixed, K1-P. falciparum K1 strain, 3D7- P. falciparum 3D7 strain, U-undigested fragment. Fragment sizes in base pair (bp) are shown.

Table 2

Prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase (Pfdhfr) and dihydropteroate synthase (Pfdhps) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 200 P. falciparum isolates from 2 endemic areas of Thailand

GeneAmino acid positionSNPsPrevalence (%)P-value

Total n=200Tak Province n=100Yala Province n=100
Pfdhfr 16A (wild-type)200 (100.0)100 (100.0)100 (100.0)-
V (mutant)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
51N (wild-type)3 (1.5)3 (3.0)0 (0.0)0.001[a]
I (mutant)187 (93.5)87 (87.0)100 (100.0)
M (mix)10 (5.0)10 (10.0)0 (0.0)
59C (wild-type)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)-
R (mutant)200 (100.0)100 (100.0)100 (100.0)
108S (wild-type)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)-
T (mutant)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
N (mutant)200 (100.0)100 (100.0)100 (100.0)
164I (wild-type)84 (42.0)6 (6.0)78 (78.0)<0.001[a]
L (mutant)103 (51.5)86 (86.0)17 (17.0)
M (mix)13 (6.5)8 (8.0)5 (5.0)

Pfdhps 436S (wild-type)158 (79.0)79 (79.0)79 (79.0)0.946
A (mutant)29 (14.5)14 (14.0)15 (15.0)
M (mix)13 (6.5)7 (7.0)6 (6.0)
437A (wild-type)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)-
G (mutant)200 (100.0)100 (100.0)100 (100.0)
540K (wild-type)116 (58.0)16 (16.0)100 (100.0)<0.001[a]
E (mutant)83 (41.5)83 (83.0)0 (0.0)
M (mix)1 (0.5)1 (1.0)0 (0.0)
581A (wild-type)7 (3.5)7 (7.0)0 (0.0)0.007[a]
G (mutant)193 (96.5)93 (93.0)100 (100.0)
613A (wild-type)100 (100.0)100 (100.0)100 (100.0)-
S/T (mutant)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)

P-value were statistically significant between 2 areas.

Table 3

Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase (Pfdhfr) and dihydropteroate synthase (Pfdhps) alleles in 170 P. falciparum isolates from 2 endemic areas of Thailand

Pfdhfr haplotypes[a]Amino acid positionPrevalence (%)


165159108164Totaln=170Tak Provincen=81Yala Provincen=89
Triple mutationAIRNI78 (45.9)6 (7.4)72 (80.9)

Triple mutationANRNL3 (1.8)3 (3.7)0 (0.0)

Quadruple mutationAIRNL89 (52.4)72 (88.9)17 (19.1)

Pfdhps haplotypes[a]Amino acid positionPrevalence (%)


436437540581613Totaln=170Tak Provincen=81Yala Provincen=89

Double mutationSGEAA2 (1.2)2 (2.5)0 (0.0)

Double mutationSGKGA85 (50.0)11 (13.6)74 (83.1)

Triple mutationAGEAA2 (1.2)2 (2.5)0 (0.0)

Triple mutationAGKGA16 (9.4)1 (1.2)15 (16.9)

Triple mutationSGEGA57 (33.5)57 (70.4)0 (0.0)

Quadruple mutationAGEGA8 (4.7)8 (9.9)0 (0.0)

P-value were statistically significant between 2 areas.

Fig. 2

The proportions of mutations in 3 resistance genes (pfdhfr, pfdhps, and pfcrt) observed in P. falciparum isolates in this study.

Table 4

Allele combinations of Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase (Pfdhfr) and dihydropteroate synthase (Pfdhps) in 170 P. falciparum isolates from 2 endemic areas of Thailand

Pfdhfr-Pfdhps allele combinationsPrevalence (%)
Totaln=170Tak Provincen=81Yala Provincen=89
AIRNI-AGEGA1 (0.6)1 (1.2)0 (0.0)
AIRNI-AGKGA13 (7.6)0 (0.0)13 (14.6)
AIRNI-SGEGA4 (2.4)4 (4.9)0 (0.0)
AIRNI-SGKGA60 (35.3)1 (1.2)59 (66.3)
AIRNL-AGEGA7 (4.1)7 (8.6)0 (0.0)
AIRNL-AGKGA3 (1.8)1 (1.2)2 (2.2)
AIRNL-SGEAA2 (1.2)2 (2.5)0 (0.0)
AIRNL-SGEGA52 (30.6)52 (64.2)0 (0.0)
AIRNL-SGKGA25 (14.7)10 (12.3)15 (16.9)
ANRNL-AGEAA2 (1.2)2 (2.5)0 (0.0)
ANRNL-SGEGA1 (0.6)1 (1.2)0 (0.0)

Analysis of Pfcrt mutations

A total of 187 samples (93.5%) were analyzed by nested PCR for the Pfcrt K76T gene. The Pfcrt mutation resulting in substitution of threonine (T) for lysine (K) at position 76 was present in all studied samples from 2 endemic areas (Figs. 1C, 2).

DISCUSSION

Mutations on Pfdhfr and Pfdhps genes associated with SP resistance have been reported in several malaria endemic areas such as Guinea [28], Indonesia [29], Malaysia [30], Myanmar [31], and Thailand [32,33]. In Thailand, a previous study revealed that the change of Pfdhfr point mutations from double mutations to triple and quadruple mutations in some areas [34,35] which the number of mutations is correlated with increased level of SP resistance [12]. In the present study, all P. falciparum isolates had at least three mutation point in Pfdhfr genes, indicated persistence of highly mutations on SP resistant markers. The Pfdhps mutation studies conducted between 2001 and 2007 in Thailand indicated that there has been fluctuation of the Pfdhps mutations between triple and quadruple mutations. In this study, predominant frequency of double mutation was found especially in isolates from southern endemic area. The predominance of triple mutations was also found in isolates from western area. This result indicated that high mutation in Pfdhfr and Pfdhps genes with different frequency existed in these 2 different localities. In Thailand, SP was withdrawn from P. falciparum treatment for many years. Although decreased of Pfdhfr and Pfdhps mutations were reported from some countries after the withdrawal of these drugs, high frequency of Pfdhfr and Pfdhps mutations still present in Thailand. This existence of mutations on Pfdhfr and Pfdhps genes may be associated with using of other antifolate drugs that can also induce pressure on Pfdhfr and Pfdhps. A previous study has demonstrated that high prevalence of Pfcrt K76T mutation in study isolates might contribute to CQ resistance to P. falciparum [36]. A high prevalence rate of Pfcrt K76T mutation was previously observed in several countries such as Mali [25], Kenya [37], Indonesia [26], Philippines [38] and Thailand [39-41]. Declining of Pfcrt mutations after withdrawal of CQ has been reported in Malawi [14], Tanzania [15], Kenya [16], and China [17]. However, even CQ was withdrawn from Thailand for long period, the CQ resistance allele still remains with high frequency. This complete fixation of CQ resistance in P. falciparum is might due to the co-existence of P. falciparum and P. vivax infections in this country while CQ is a standard regimen for P. vivax malaria treatment, leading to the phenomenon of continuous exposure to drug pressure in P. falciparum. Our study demonstrates a high prevalence of Pfdhfr, Pfdhps, and Pfcrt mutations of P. falciparum isolates from 2 endemic areas in Thailand, emphasizing the fixation of mutant Pfdhfr, Pfdhps and Pfcrt alleles that confer consistent resistance of SP and CQ. SP and CQ drugs are still not appropriate for P. falciparum treatment in Thailand and other antimalarial groups should be considered.
  39 in total

1.  Artemisinin-resistant malaria in Asia.

Authors:  Harald Noedl; Duong Socheat; Wichai Satimai
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Plasmodium falciparum: detection of polymorphisms in the dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthetase genes by PCR and restriction digestion.

Authors:  M T Duraisingh; J Curtis; D C Warhurst
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.011

3.  Countrywide survey shows very high prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum multilocus resistance genotypes in Cambodia.

Authors:  Nimol Khim; Christiane Bouchier; Marie-Thérèse Ekala; Sandra Incardona; Pharath Lim; Eric Legrand; Ronan Jambou; Socheat Doung; Odile Mercereau Puijalon; Thierry Fandeur
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  A comparative evaluation of sulfalene-trimethoprim and sulphormethoxine-pyrimethamine against falciparum malaria in Thailand.

Authors:  W Chin; D M Bear; E J Colwell; S Kosakal
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.345

5.  Prevalence of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance-associated mutations in dhfr and dhps genes of Plasmodium falciparum three years after SP withdrawal in Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Elifaged Hailemeskel; Moges Kassa; Gemechu Taddesse; Hussien Mohammed; Adugna Woyessa; Geremew Tasew; Markos Sleshi; Amha Kebede; Beyene Petros
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.112

6.  Amodiaquine resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in vivo is associated with selection of pfcrt 76T and pfmdr1 86Y.

Authors:  Gabrielle Holmgren; José P Gil; Pedro M Ferreira; Maria I Veiga; Charles O Obonyo; Anders Björkman
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 3.342

7.  Decreased prevalence of the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter 76T marker associated with cessation of chloroquine use against P. falciparum malaria in Hainan, People's Republic of China.

Authors:  Xinhua Wang; Jianbing Mu; Guoqiao Li; Peiquan Chen; Xingbo Guo; Linchun Fu; Lin Chen; Xinzhuan Su; Thomas E Wellems
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.345

8.  Two novel mutations of pfdhps K540T and I588F, affecting sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine-resistant response in uncomplicated falciparum malaria at Banjar district, South Kalimantan Province, Indonesia.

Authors:  Sukmawati Basuki; Sugeng Riyanto; Yoes P Dachlan; Haruki Uemura
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 2.979

9.  An outbreak of artemisinin resistant falciparum malaria in Eastern Thailand.

Authors:  Mallika Imwong; Thantip Jindakhad; Chanon Kunasol; Kreepol Sutawong; Phisitt Vejakama; Arjen M Dondorp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Detection of a substantial number of sub-microscopic Plasmodium falciparum infections by polymerase chain reaction: a potential threat to malaria control and diagnosis in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Lemu Golassa; Nizar Enweji; Berhanu Erko; Abraham Aseffa; Göte Swedberg
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 2.979

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.