Literature DB >> 35500201

Influence of Steric Shield on Biocompatibility and Antithrombotic Activity of Dendritic Polyphosphate Inhibitor.

Srinivas Abbina1,2, Chanel C La2,3, Sreeparna Vappala1,2, Manu Thomas Kalathottukaren1,2, Usama Abbasi1,2, Arshdeep Gill2,3, Stephanie A Smith4, Charles A Haynes2,5, James H Morrissey4,6, Jayachandran N Kizhakkedathu1,2,3,7.   

Abstract

The polyanion, inorganic polyphosphate (polyP), is a procoagulant molecule which has become a promising therapeutic target in the development of antithrombotics. Neutralizing polyP's prothrombotic activity using polycationic inhibitors is one of the viable strategies to design new polyP inhibitors. However, in this approach, a fine balance between the electrostatic interaction of polyP and the inhibitor is needed. Any unprotected polycations are known to interact with negatively charged blood components, potentially resulting in platelet activation, cellular toxicity, and bleeding. Thus, designing potent polycationic polyP inhibitors with good biocompatibility is a major challenge. Building on our previous research on universal heparin reversal agent (UHRA), we report polyP inhibitors with a modified steric shield design. The molecular weight, number of cationic binding groups, and the length of the polyethylene glycol (PEG) chains were varied to arrive at the desired inhibitor. We studied two different PEG lengths (mPEG-750 versus mPEG-350) on the polyglycerol scaffold and investigated their influence on biocompatibility and polyP neutralization activity. The polyP inhibitor with mPEG-750 brush layer, mPEG750 UHRA-10, showed superior biocompatibility compared to its mPEG-350 analogs by a number of measured parameters without losing its neutralization activity. An increase in cationic binding groups (25 groups in mPEG750 UHRA-8 and 32 in mPEG750 UHRA-10 [HC]) did not alter the neutralization activity, which suggested that the mPEG-750 shield layer provides significant protection of cationic binding groups and thus helps to minimize unwanted nonspecific interactions. Furthermore, these modified polyP inhibitors are highly biocompatible compared to conventional polycations that have been previously used as polyP inhibitors (e.g., PAMAM dendrimers and polyethylenimine). Through this study, we demonstrated the importance of the design of steric shield toward highly biocompatible polyP inhibitors. This approach can be exploited in the design of highly biocompatible macromolecular inhibitors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antithrombotics; biocompatibility; polycations; polyethylene glycol; polyglycerol; polyphosphate inhibitors; thrombosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35500201      PMCID: PMC9241529          DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharm        ISSN: 1543-8384            Impact factor:   5.364


  42 in total

1.  Polyphosphate modulates blood coagulation and fibrinolysis.

Authors:  Stephanie A Smith; Nicola J Mutch; Deepak Baskar; Peter Rohloff; Roberto Docampo; James H Morrissey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A Positively Charged Surface Triggers Coagulation Activation Through Factor VII Activating Protease (FSAP).

Authors:  Claudia Sperling; Manfred F Maitz; Simona Grasso; Carsten Werner; Sandip M Kanse
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 3.  Polyphosphate: an ancient molecule that links platelets, coagulation, and inflammation.

Authors:  James H Morrissey; Sharon H Choi; Stephanie A Smith
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Inhibition of polyphosphate as a novel strategy for preventing thrombosis and inflammation.

Authors:  Stephanie A Smith; Sharon H Choi; Julie N R Collins; Richard J Travers; Brian C Cooley; James H Morrissey
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Biocompatibility of polycations: in vitro agglutination and lysis of red blood cells and in vivo toxicity.

Authors:  Elisabeth Moreau; Martine Domurado; Pascal Chapon; Michel Vert; Dominique Domurad
Journal:  J Drug Target       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.121

6.  Nucleic acid scavengers inhibit thrombosis without increasing bleeding.

Authors:  Shashank Jain; George A Pitoc; Eda K Holl; Ying Zhang; Luke Borst; Kam W Leong; Jaewoo Lee; Bruce A Sullenger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Comparison of reversal activity and mechanism of action of UHRA, andexanet, and PER977 on heparin and oral FXa inhibitors.

Authors:  Manu T Kalathottukaren; A Louise Creagh; Srinivas Abbina; Genmin Lu; Mark J Karbarz; Anjali Pandey; Pamela B Conley; Jayachandran N Kizhakkedathu; Charles Haynes
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-08-28

8.  Neutralizing blood-borne polyphosphate in vivo provides safe thromboprotection.

Authors:  Linda Labberton; Ellinor Kenne; Andy T Long; Katrin F Nickel; Antonio Di Gennaro; Rachel A Rigg; James S Hernandez; Lynn Butler; Coen Maas; Evi X Stavrou; Thomas Renné
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Platelet polyphosphates are proinflammatory and procoagulant mediators in vivo.

Authors:  Felicitas Müller; Nicola J Mutch; Wolfdieter A Schenk; Stephanie A Smith; Lucie Esterl; Henri M Spronk; Stefan Schmidbauer; William A Gahl; James H Morrissey; Thomas Renné
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 10.  Understanding Infection-Induced Thrombosis: Lessons Learned From Animal Models.

Authors:  Nonantzin Beristain-Covarrubias; Marisol Perez-Toledo; Mark R Thomas; Ian R Henderson; Steve P Watson; Adam F Cunningham
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.