| Literature DB >> 35498683 |
Xiaoqing Xian1, Haoxiang Zhao1, Rui Wang1, Huijie Qiao2, Jianyang Guo1, Guifen Zhang1, Wanxue Liu1, Fanghao Wan1.
Abstract
Ecological niche is a key concept that links species distributions. Ecological niche shifts are expected to affect the potential invasive risk of alien species. Rapistrum rugosum is an invasive agricultural weed in many countries. Wild populations of R. rugosum have been recorded in China, representing a great threat to the regional crops. Based on distribution records from different regions and relevant environmental variables, the present study predicted the potential distribution and estimated the invasive risk of R. rugosum in China. Ecological niche shifts strongly affected the potential invasive risk of R. rugosum in China. The two most important variables were annual temperature range (Bio7) and mean temperature of the coldest quarter (Bio11). The total suitable habitat for the species covered an area of 287.53 × 104km2 and was mainly distributed in Southwest, Southeast, and Central China. Australia, Canada, Brazil, the United States, and Argentina accounted for over 90% of the inspection records of R. rugosum from Chinese entry ports during 2015-2018. The intercepted R. rugosum was frequently mixed in Glycine max (L.) Merr., Hordeum vulgare L., linseed, Triticum aestivum L., and Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Moreover, 80% interceptions were recorded from Tianjin, Guangdong, Nanjing, and Chengdu customs. Climatic conditions do not limit the establishment capability of R. rugosum in China. Our results provide a theoretical reference for the development of monitoring and control measures for this invasive weed.Entities:
Keywords: MaxEnt model; Rapistrum rugosum; ecological niche; invasive risk; suitable habitat
Year: 2022 PMID: 35498683 PMCID: PMC9051486 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.827497
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1World distribution records of Rapistrum rugosum. Red and green points indicate invasive and native distribution records, respectively.
FIGURE 2Omission rates and AICc values for all, non-significant, and selected “best” candidate models based on the invasive, native, and native + invasive records of Rapistrum rugosum.
FIGURE 3Regularized training gains of environmental variables using the Jackknife method in MaxEnt based on the native and invasive distribution records of Rapistrum rugosum.
FIGURE 4Response curves of the presence probability of Rapistrum rugosum.
FIGURE 5Potential geographic distribution of Rapistrum rugosum based on the native (A), invasive (B), and native + invasive (C) distribution records and the ecological niche centroid of R. rugosum (D).
Ecological niche overlap of Rapistrum rugosum.
| Ecological niche overlap | Native + Invasive | Invasive | Native |
| Native + Invasive | 1 | 0.92 | 0.25 |
| Invasive | 0.92 | 1 | 0.49 |
| Native | 0.25 | 0.49 | 1 |
FIGURE 6Imported commodities, countries of origin, and customs with interception records of Rapistrum rugosum in China during 2015–2018.
FIGURE 7Potential invasive risk areas of Rapistrum rugosum in China.