| Literature DB >> 35498644 |
Zi-Jin Hu1, Yan-Yan Huang1, Xiao-Yu Lin1, Hui Feng1, Shi-Xin Zhou1, Ying Xie1, Xin-Xian Liu1, Chen Liu1, Ru-Meng Zhao1, Wen-Sheng Zhao2, Chuan-Hong Feng3, Mei Pu1, Yun-Peng Ji1, Xiao-Hong Hu1, Guo-Bang Li1, Jing-Hao Zhao1, Zhi-Xue Zhao1, He Wang1, Ji-Wei Zhang1, Jing Fan1, Yan Li1, Yun-Liang Peng4, Min He1, De-Qiang Li1, Fu Huang1, You-Liang Peng2, Wen-Ming Wang1.
Abstract
Magnaporthe oryzae is the causative agent of rice blast, a devastating disease in rice worldwide. Based on the gene-for-gene paradigm, resistance (R) proteins can recognize their cognate avirulence (AVR) effectors to activate effector-triggered immunity. AVR genes have been demonstrated to evolve rapidly, leading to breakdown of the cognate resistance genes. Therefore, understanding the variation of AVR genes is essential to the deployment of resistant cultivars harboring the cognate R genes. In this study, we analyzed the nucleotide sequence polymorphisms of eight known AVR genes, namely, AVR-Pita1, AVR-Pii, AVR-Pia, AVR-Pik, AVR-Pizt, AVR-Pi9, AVR-Pib, and AVR-Pi54 in a total of 383 isolates from 13 prefectures in the Sichuan Basin. We detected the presence of AVR-Pik, AVR-Pi54, AVR-Pizt, AVR-Pi9, and AVR-Pib in the isolates of all the prefectures, but not AVR-Pita1, AVR-Pii, and AVR-Pia in at least seven prefectures, indicating loss of the three AVRs. We also detected insertions of Pot3, Mg-SINE, and indels in AVR-Pib, solo-LTR of Inago2 in AVR-Pizt, and gene duplications in AVR-Pik. Consistently, the isolates that did not harboring AVR-Pia were virulent to IRBLa-A, the monogenic line containing Pia, and the isolates with variants of AVR-Pib and AVR-Pizt were virulent to IRBLb-B and IRBLzt-t, the monogenic lines harboring Pib and Piz-t, respectively, indicating breakdown of resistance by the loss and variations of the avirulence genes. Therefore, the use of blast resistance genes should be alarmed by the loss and nature variations of avirulence genes in the blast fungal population in the Sichuan Basin.Entities:
Keywords: Magnaporthe oryzae; avirulence gene; monogenetic lines; resistance gene; rice blast; variation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35498644 PMCID: PMC9040519 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.788876
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
Figure 1Distribution of avirulence (AVR) genes in the Sichuan Basin. (A) Location of rice blast nurseries in the Sichuan Basin. (B) The distribution of eight AVR genes in the indicated nurseries. The presence of each AVR gene was indicated by shaded box (shadow key) in the 383 field isolates from 13 prefectures (top) where the strains formed different number of groups (bottom). (C) The classification of Magnaporthe oryzae (M. oryzae) strains based on the presence of AVR genes. Upper panel shows the presence/absence of each AVR gene and lower panel shows the number of isolates in each group. Purple, presence; yellow, absence.
Figure 2Loss of AVR-Pia broke down the resistance of Pia in rice. The representative blast disease phenotypes displayed on the leaves of susceptible line Lijiangxin Tuan Heigu (LTH) upon inoculation with the indicated strains. IRBLa-A is the monogenic line harboring the blast resistance gene Pia. AVR-Pia is present in the three isolates, namely, 19ZZ57, 19ZZ50, and DZ33, but not in the others, TJ101, DZ24, and YS01. The representative figures were taken at 5 days postinoculation (dpi).
Figure 3AVR-Pib variants and their pathogenicity to IRBLb-B. (A) Graph illustrates the location of the primer pairs AvrPibF/AvrPibR and AvrPibF2/AvrPibR used to examine the variation in AVR-Pib locus. (B) Amplification patterns of AVR-Pib. Four amplification patterns (AP0-AP3) were classified by the size of the fragments, which amplified from different isolates by indicated primers. AP0 indicates no amplicon. AP1, AP2, and AP3 indicate different sizes of amplicons. M, marker. (C) Characterization of allelic variations at AVR-Pib. H1 to H10, ten haplotypes of AVR-Pib contain different variations. (D) Pathogenicity of the indicated isolates on the monogenic line IRBLb-B carrying Pib. A, absence of AVR-Pib in the indicated strain.
Figure 4Distribution of isolates carrying variants of invalid AVR-Pib in 13 nurseries of the Sichuan Basin. Four variants, namely, absence, Mg-SINE insertion, Pot3 insertion, and coding sequence (CDS) 37-38Del, which caused function loss of AVR-Pib. Wild type (WT) denotes isolates have similar amplification size of AVR-Pib WT. Although some of variants may exist short insertions in the promoter of AVR-Pib, it is still avirulence to the monogenic line IRBLb-B carrying Pib.
Figure 5AVR-Pizt variants and their pathogenicity to IRBLzt-T. (A) Schematic diagram of AVR-Pizt and the insert site of a solo-LTR of Inago2. (B) Amplification patterns of AVR-Pizt from the indicated isolates. The primers AvrPiztF/AvrPiztR were used to distinguish three alleles. AP0 indicates no amplicon. AP1, AP2, and AP3 indicate different sizes of amplicons. (C) Pathogenicity of representative strains on the monogenic line IRBLzt-T carrying Piz-t. AP1 strains have an insertion of solo-LTR in AVR-Pizt gene and AP2 strains have WT allele of AVR-Pizt gene.
Figure 6The variation and distribution of AVR-Pik alleles in the Sichuan Basin. (A) AVR-Pik alleles characterized in the isolates from the Sichuan Basin. −4bp, CTTT is deleted at −42 to −39 of the promoter of AVR-PikD. —, no change compared with WT. (B) Ratio of isolates harboring different AVR-Pik alleles. (C) Ratio of AVR-Pik alleles in the indicated 13 prefectures in the Sichuan Basin.
Figure 7The composition and distribution of MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 isolates in the M. oryzae population in the Sichuan Basin. (A) The composition of MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 in the isolates. (B) The distribution of isolates with different mating types in the Sichuan Basin.