| Literature DB >> 35498367 |
Ji-Hoon Na1, Heung Dong Kim2, Young-Mock Lee3.
Abstract
Background: Whether epilepsy surgery, such as corpus callosotomy is effective in patients with pediatric intractable epilepsy with mitochondrial dysfunction is controversial, and there is a paucity of literature on this issue. Objective: This study aimed to assess and describe the effective application of corpus callosotomy for treating pediatric patients with intractable epilepsy with mitochondrial dysfunction in a single institution in Korea.Entities:
Keywords: corpus callosotomy; epilepsy; epilepsy surgery; mitochondrial dysfunction; seizure
Year: 2022 PMID: 35498367 PMCID: PMC9039434 DOI: 10.1177/17562864221092551
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ther Adv Neurol Disord ISSN: 1756-2856 Impact factor: 6.430
General characteristics of patients before corpus callosotomy.
| Total ( | Mitochondrial dysfunction (+) ( | Mitochondrial dysfunction (–) ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male:female) | 15:5 | 7:3 | 8:2 | 1.00 |
| Age of diagnosis of epilepsy (years) | 0.7 (0.2–9.4) | 2.1 (0.2–9.4) | 0.6 (0.3–3.0) | 0.17 |
| Time interval from diagnosis of epilepsy to evaluation of mitochondrial dysfunction (years) | 2.4 (0.4–9.0) | 3.2 (0.4–9.0) | 2.3 (0.5–6.5) | 0.53 |
| Time interval from evaluation of mitochondrial dysfunction to corpus callosotomy (years) | 1.0 (0.0–6.7) | 1.1 (0–6.7) | 0.9 (0–3.5) | 0.74 |
| Seizure type, | ||||
| Focal/generalized tonic | 17 | 10 | 7 | 0.21 |
| Epileptic spasms | 15 | 8 | 7 | 1.00 |
| Generalized tonic clonic | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1.00 |
| Myoclonic | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0.66 |
| Focal | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1.00 |
| Seizure frequency | ||||
| Daily | 20 | 10 | 10 | – |
| Weekly | 0 | 0 | 0 | – |
| Monthly | 0 | 0 | 0 | – |
| Number of ASMs | 4 (2–6) | 5 (2–6) | 4 (3–5) | 0.32 |
| History of ketogenic diets | 17 | 8 | 9 | 1.00 |
| Electroencephalography ( | ||||
| Normal (Grade 1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Slow and disorganized background rhythm (Grade 2) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Slow and disorganized background rhythm with focal or unilateral sharp wave discharges (Grade 3) | 0 | 0 | 0 | – |
| Slow and disorganized background rhythm with multifocal sharp wave discharges with/without GSSW or GPFA (Grade 4) | 20 | 10 | 10 | |
ASM, anti-seizure medications; GPFA, generalized paroxysmal fast activities; GSSW, generalized spike and slow wave discharges.
Mitochondrial dysfunction profiles of patients (n = 10).
| No. of patient | Finding of muscle biopsy | Biochemistry | Serum lactic acidosis (mmol/L) | L/P | Epilepsy to Dx of mitochondrial dysfunction (years) | Brain MRI findings | Brain MRS findings | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LM | EM | MRC defect | ||||||
| 1 | Non-specific | Megaconia | No | 0.7 | 5.88 | 4.40 | Diffuse brain atrophy | – |
| 2 | RRFs | Megaconia | Yes | 1.70 | 1.55 | 1.12 | Diffuse brain atrophy | – |
| 3 | Non-specific | Megaconia | Yes | 3.20 | 2.67 | 6.97 | Diffuse brain atrophy | Lactate peak on BG |
| 4 | Non-specific | Subsarcolemmal aggregation | Yes | 0.90 | 0.60 | 6.20 | Mild cerebellar atrophy | Normal |
| 5 | Non-specific | Megaconia | Yes | 1.30 | 0.87 | 3.94 | Normal | Normal |
| 6 | RRFs | Megaconia | Yes | 1.48 | 17.6 | 0.41 | Diffuse brain atrophy | Non-specific decreased NAA |
| 7 | Non-specific | Subsarcolemmal aggregation | No | 0.80 | 0.73 | 9.05 | White matter volume loss with high signal change | – |
| 8 | Non-specific | Subsarcolemmal aggregation | Yes | 1.40 | 1.27 | 2.37 | Diffuse brain atrophy | – |
| 9 | Non-specific | Megaconia | No | 1.16 | 8.06 | 2.30 | Normal | – |
| 10 | Non-specific | Megaconia | Yes | 0.9 | 1.13 | 0.38 | Diffuse brain atrophy | Non-specific decreased NAA |
BG, basal ganglia; Dx, diagnosis; EM, electron microscopy; LM, light microscopy; L/P, lactate to pyruvate ratio; MRC, mitochondrial respiratory chain; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MRS, magnetic resonance spectroscopy; NAA, N-acetylaspartate; No., number; RRF, ragged red fiber.
Outcomes of corpus callosotomy of each patient (n = 20).
| No. of patients | Age at time of CC (years) | Sex | Pathology in muscle biopsy | Type of CC | Reduction rate of seizures after CC (%) | Reduction of traumatic falling seizures (%) | EEG before CC | EEG after CC (3 months) | EEG after CC (12 months) | EEG lateralization (12 months) | Cognitive progress (1 year f/u) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start | 3 months | 6 months | 9 months | 12 months | Grade | Grade | Grade | ||||||||
| 1 | 14.8 | M | Yes | Total | 0 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 50 | 75 | Grade 4 | Grade 3 | Grade 3 | Yes | Static |
| 2 | 8.8 | M | Yes | Total | 0 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | >90 | Grade 4 | Grade 3 | Grade 3 | Yes | Static |
| 3 | 17 | M | Yes | Total | 0 | 100 | 100 | 90 | 90 | >90 | Grade 4 | Grade 3 | Grade 3 | Yes | Static |
| 4 | 11.2 | M | Yes | Total | 0 | 90 | 90 | 75 | 75 | >90 | Grade 4 | Grade 3 | Grade 3 | Yes | Static |
| 5 | 8.2 | M | Yes | Total | 0 | 90 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50–75 | Grade 4 | Grade 3 | Grade 3 | Yes | Static |
| 6 | 1 | M | Yes | Total | 0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 90 | No change | Grade 4 | Grade 3 | Grade 3 | Yes | Improved |
| 7 | 10.5 | M | Yes | Total | 0 | 100 | 90 | 90 | 5 | >90 | Grade 4 | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | No | Static |
| 8 | 8.6 | F | Yes | Total | 0 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | No change | Grade 4 | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | No | Static |
| 9 | 1.5 | F | Yes | Total | 0 | 90 | 90 | 75 | 75 | >90 | Grade 4 | Grade 4 | Grade 4 | No | Static |
| 10 | 3.5 | F | Yes | Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No change | Grade 4 | Grade 4 | Grade 4 | No | Static |
| 11 | 5.7 | F | No | Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 50 | 25 | Grade 4 | Grade 3 | Grade 3 | Yes | Static |
| 12 | 5.2 | M | No | Total | 0 | 90 | 90 | 100 | 100 | 100 | Grade 4 | Grade 3 | Grade 2 | Yes | Improved |
| 13 | 5.6 | M | No | Total | 0 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | >90 | Grade 4 | Grade 4 | Grade 4 | No | Static |
| 14 | 6.4 | M | No | Total | 0 | 90 | 90 | 75 | 75 | >90 | Grade 4 | Grade 3 | Grade 3 | Yes | Static |
| 15 | 5.1 | F | No | Total | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50–75 | Grade 4 | Grade 3 | Grade 3 | Yes | Static |
| 16 | 1.9 | M | No | Total | 0 | 90 | 90 | 100 | 100 | 100 | Grade 4 | Grade 4 | Grade 4 | No | Static |
| 17 | 1.7 | M | No | Total | 0 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | >90 | Grade 4 | Grade 3 | Grade 3 | Yes | Static |
| 18 | 7.1 | M | No | Total | 0 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 50–75 | Grade 4 | Grade 3 | Grade 3 | Yes | Static |
| 19 | 4.1 | M | No | Total | 0 | 75 | 90 | 100 | 100 | 100 | Grade 4 | Grade 3 | Grade 3 | Yes | Static |
| 20 | 5.7 | M | No | Total | 0 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50–75 | Grade 4 | Grade 3 | Grade 3 | Yes | Static |
CC, corpus callosotomy; EEG, electroencephalography; No., number.
Comparison of number of improved patients after corpus callosotomy of the two groups.
| Mitochondrial dysfunction group | Non-mitochondrial dysfunction group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Seizure reduction after CC (12 months) | |||
| Reduction more than 50% | 5 | 7 | 0.65 |
| Seizure free | 0 | 3 | 0.21 |
| Reduction of traumatic falling seizure | |||
| More than 50% | 7 | 9 | 0.58 |
| EEG improvement | |||
| EEG after CC (3 months) | 8 | 8 | 1.00 |
| EEG after CC (12 months) | 6 | 8 | 0.63 |
| Lateralization (12 months) | 6 | 8 | 0.63 |
| Cognitive function | 1 | 1 | 1.00 |
CC, corpus callosotomy; EEG, electroencephalography.