| Literature DB >> 35498197 |
Lu Liu1.
Abstract
With the deepening of reform and opening up, great changes have taken place in the university financial management system. The role of financial analysis in university activities is becoming more and more obvious. In the new environment, especially in university financial reporting, we must establish effective reasonable and scientific financial analysis index system and quality evaluation team. In order to reflect the financial situation of colleges and universities, the university financial analysis indicators in this field have important theoretical and practical significance, such as finance, budget implementation, effective utilization of funds, risk prevention, and the formulation and application of such indicators. The financial management level of colleges and universities is improved, and the scientific development of colleges and universities is promoted. In this paper, we introduce the dynamic model of neurons, design a learning algorithm, and apply it to the quality evaluation of financial reports in colleges and universities. Through this research, a single-layer feedback network capable of fast learning and learning is established. This is not only helpful for universities to evaluate the quality of financial accounting business. However, enriching the significance of financial management in higher education has theoretical value.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35498197 PMCID: PMC9050283 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8520576
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Financial accounting work system in colleges and universities.
Figure 2University financial system.
Figure 3Evaluation indicators.
Figure 4Dynamic neuron model.
Figure 5Model architecture diagram.
Software and hardware configuration information.
| Project | Configuration |
|---|---|
| CPU | Intel Core i7 7700 |
| Memory | 128G |
| GPU | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 2080ti |
| Operating system | Windows 10 |
| Cuda | Cuda_9.0.176_384.81 with cudnn9.0 |
| Language environment |
|
Model output results with actual value.
| Colleges and universities | Year | Actual warning value | Network output |
|---|---|---|---|
| SH15 | 2018 | (01000) | (0.1635 1.0000 0.0002 0.0004 0.0064) |
| SH16 | 2018 | (00010) | (0.0000 0.0003 0.0043 0.9634 0.0051) |
Financial risk identification results.
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Actual output value | 1.2457 | 2.0121 | 3.2807 |
| Ideal output value | 1.0000 | 2.0000 | 3.0000 |
| Relative recognition error | 25% | 1% | 9% |
| Average recognition error | 12% | ||
Comparison of experimental results.
| Static neural network (%) | SVM (%) | Our model (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recognition accuracy | 89 | 85 | 98 |