| Literature DB >> 35498172 |
Yi Li1.
Abstract
In today's highly urbanized world, indoor space is becoming more extensive and more complex, and under the increasingly urgent needs, indoor positioning has attracted people's attention. With the rapid development of LED lighting technology, indoor positioning technology based on visible light communication has many advantages over traditional indoor positioning technology. Aiming at the influence of environmental factors such as noise and reflected light on the positioning accuracy, the compression perception theory is applied to the localization of visible light. The position of the receiving end in the positioning space is defined as a sparse variable in the discrete space. The power measurement matrix is expressed as the product of the observation matrix, and the sparse matrix and sparse vector in the compression perception theory are expressed. The traditional APIT algorithm is easy to misjudge unknown nodes in the triangle, resulting in low positioning accuracy of the algorithm. In this study, an indoor visible positioning algorithm based on hybrid APIT is proposed, which uses the area relationship of the triangle to determine the initial position of the unknown node, and then uses the tangent circle to further narrow the area where the unknown node may be located, and uses the hybrid centroid localization algorithm to obtain the estimated position of the unknown node.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35498172 PMCID: PMC9050262 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9832244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1VLC indoor positioning model.
Comparison table of indoor positioning technologies.
| Indoor positioning technology | Positioning accuracy | Relative cost | Merit | Shortcoming | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wireless network | 2–50 m | Low | Low cost and strong communication skills | Susceptible to environmental disturbances | The application adopts the placement of wireless base stations in the area, and comprehensively determines the coordinates of the Wi-Fi device to be located according to the signal characteristics of the Wi-Fi device to be located, combined with the topology of the wireless base station. |
| Bluetooth | 2–10 m | Low | The device is small in size, easy to integrate, easy to integrate, and easy to use | The propagation distance is short and the stability is poor. | High price and less use. |
| Ultra-wideband | 6–10 cm | Ix | High precision and strong penetration | Costly | It is mainly used in coal mines, chemicals, electric power and energy, hospitals, nursing homes, tunnels, manufacturing, public inspection and justice, and other industries. |
| Ultrasonic | 1–10 cm | High | High positioning accuracy | The propagation distance is short and the stability is poor. | — |
| Radio frequency identification | 0.05–5 m | Middle | The cost is not high, the precision is high | Identities have no communication skills and the distance is short. | Typical applications for personnel positioning come from the expansion of personnel attendance systems. |
| Siegbi | Length—2 m | Low | Low power consumption, low cost | Poor stability and susceptibility to environmental interference. | — |
| Infrared | 5–10 m | High | High positioning accuracy | Straight line of sight, short transmission distance, easy to interfere. | It is not widely used for the time being. |
Figure 2The shadow area of the triangle where the projection point M is located.
Figure 3Projection point M is located inside the A1A2A3 Δ.
Positioning system parameters.
| Parameter | Numeric value | |
|---|---|---|
| Indoor environment | Reflection coefficient of the wall/ceiling/floor | 0.66/0.35/0.66 |
| Room size | 5.0 m × 5.0 m × 3.0 m | |
| Diffuse scale | 0.7 | |
| Specular scale | 0.3 | |
|
| ||
| Transmitter | Coefficient of refraction | 1 |
| LED transmit power | 1 W | |
| Half-power angle | 60° | |
|
| ||
| Receiver side | Effective area | 1 point × 1 point |
| Sensitivity | 0.4 amps/watt | |
| Receive the viewing angle | 70° | |
Figure 4Close to the fence in two grids.
Figure 5AOA method positioning principle.
Figure 6Noise-induced positioning error.
Figure 7Correlation between SIG noise ratio and LED transmit power under Gaussian noise shadows.
Figure 8Positioning the system model.
Figure 9Correlation between SIG noise ratio and LED emission power under Gaussian noise shadow.