| Literature DB >> 35497582 |
Miao-Miao Wang1,2, Jing Yu3, Dao-Lei Wang4, Rui Si1,5.
Abstract
Platinum oxide supported on a Lewis acid niobium oxide (Nb2O5) support has been used for various heterogeneous and homogeneous catalysts. In this work, we used urea as a precipitating agent to obtain crystallized Nb2O5 with high surface area via a hydrothermal route. Nb2O5-supported Pt catalysts were subsequently synthesized via an incipient wetness impregnation approach. Multiple characterizations including X-ray diffraction (XRD), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and nitrogen adsorption/desorption confirmed the identical structural and textural properties of the Nb2O5 support before and after the impregnation process. Furthermore, the X-ray absorption fine structure technique (XAFS) results with related data analysis indicate that the platinum species in the fresh and H2-pretreated samples were in the form of single atoms or ultrafine clusters. In addition, the decrease in coordination number (CN) of the first-shell Pt-O bond, as well as the formation of Pt-Pt contribution with very low CN, after H2-pretreatment was verified, which corresponds to the decrease of oxidation state for Pt species on the surface of supports. Thus, the ultrafine-clustered metallic Pt species are considered to be more active than the oxidized Pt single ions. The current results will be of great significance in controllable synthesis of active Pt-based catalysts for other catalytic oxidation reactions. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35497582 PMCID: PMC9050684 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra01252a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1CO oxidation conversion over Pt–Nb2O5 samples for “light-off” experiments from 30 to 300 °C of catalysts.
Pt concentration, BET specific surface areas (SBET), BJH pore volume (Vp) of Nb2O5 supports, temperature for 50% CO conversion (T1/2)
| Sample | Pt loading |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nb2O5 | — | 127 ± 1 | 0.296 ± 0.002 | — |
| 1 Pt–Nb2O5 | 0.8 | 121 ± 1 | 0.280 ± 0.002 | 231 |
| 189 | ||||
| 0.5 Pt–Nb2O5 | 0.4 | 120 ± 1 | 0.287 ± 0.003 | 258 |
| 209 | ||||
| 0.3 Pt–Nb2O5 | 0.3 | 121 ± 1 | 0.290 ± 0.002 | 265 |
| 215 | ||||
| 0.1 Pt–Nb2O5 | 0.1 | 119 ± 1 | 0.289 ± 0.002 | 282 |
| 233 | ||||
| 0.05 Pt–Nb2O5 | 0.07 | 114 ± 1 | 0.280 ± 0.003 | >300 |
| 244 |
Determined by ICP.
From N2 adsorption/desorption.
Temperature for 50% CO conversion.
After O2-pretreatment.
After H2-pretreatment.
Averaged Grain Size (DXRD) and Particle Size (DTEM) of samples
| Sample |
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh | H2 | Used | Fresh | H2 | Used | |
| Nb2O5 | 11.9 | — | — | 11.3 ± 2.4 | — | — |
| 1 Pt–Nb2O5 | 14.9 | 12.5 | 13.5 | 12.4 ± 2.6 | 12.1 ± 1.9 | 13.1 ± 2.3 |
| 10.8 | ||||||
| 0.5 Pt–Nb2O5 | 11.7 | — | 9.6 | — | — | — |
| 13.7 | ||||||
| 0.3 Pt–Nb2O5 | 13.3 | 12.5 | 10.8 | 11.2 ± 2.8 | 11.7 ± 2.5 | 11.1 ± 3.1 |
| 11.4 | ||||||
| 0.1 Pt–Nb2O5 | 12.6 | — | 13.4 | — | — | — |
| 12.4 | ||||||
| 0.05 Pt–Nb2O5 | 10.4 | — | 10.7 | — | — | — |
| 10.7 | ||||||
Calculated from XRD patterns by Scherrer equation.
Statistic data on the basis of TEM images.
Fresh samples.
After H2-pretreatment.
Used samples after CO oxidation.
After CO oxidation with H2-pretreatment.
After CO oxidation with O2-pretreatment.
Fig. 2TEM images of Nb2O5 samples.
Fig. 3HRTEM images of (a, c and e) 0.3 Pt/Nb2O5 and (b, d and f) 1 Pt/Nb2O5; (a and b) fresh samples; (c and d) after H2-pretreatment samples; (e and f) used samples with H2-pretreatment samples.
Fig. 4H2-TPR analysis of the synthesized catalysts.
Fig. 5Pt L3-edge XANES profiles (a and b) and EXAFS fitting results in R space (c and d) of Pt–Nb2O5 samples: (a and c) 0.3 Pt–Nb2O5 and (b and d) 1 Pt–Nb2O5.
Oxidation state of platinum (δ) and Pt L3-edge EXAFS fitting results (R, distance; CN, coordination number; σ2 Debye–Waller factor; ΔE0, inner potential correction b) of Pt–Nb2O5 samples
| Sample |
| Pt–O | Pt–Pt |
| Δ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| CN |
| CN | ||||
| 1 Pt–Nb2O5-fresh | 1.82 ± 0.04 | 1.98 ± 0.01 | 4.1 ± 0.2 | — | — | 0.003(O)0.005 ± 0.001(Pt) | 12.1 ± 0.7 |
| 1 Pt–Nb2O5–H2 | 1.20 ± 0.02 | 2.00 ± 0.01 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | — | — | 10.2 ± 2.5 | |
| 1 Pt–Nb2O5-used | 1.01 ± 0.02 | 1.97 ± 0.01 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 2.70 ± 0.02 | 1.8 ± 0.6 | 8.3 ± 1.4 | |
| 0.3 Pt–Nb2O5-fresh | 1.84 ± 0.02 | 1.98 ± 0.01 | 4.1 ± 0.3 | — | — | 12.1 ± 0.7 | |
| 0.3 Pt–Nb2O5–H2 | 1.13 ± 0.02 | 2.00 ± 0.02 | 2.3 ± 0.5 | — | — | 10.2 ± 2.5 | |
| 0.3 Pt–Nb2O5-used | 0.72 ± 0.02 | 1.97 ± 0.01 | 1.7 ± 0.3 | 2.74 ± 0.01 | 4.9 ± 1.2 | 8.3 ± 1.4 | |
Scheme 1Schematic illustration of the structural transformation of Pt/N2O5.