| Literature DB >> 35497527 |
Xiaobo Zhang1, Yang Ma2, Xiaoqing Chen2, Xuhong Li3, Wencai Zhou1, Nabonswende Aida Nadege Ouedraogo1, Yasuhiro Shirai4, Yongzhe Zhang2, Hui Yan1.
Abstract
Flexible perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have attracted tremendous attention due to their potential application in portable and wearable electronics. However, the photoelectric conversion efficiency (PCE) of flexible PSCs is still far lower than that of usual rigid PSCs. Moreover, the mechanical stability of flexible PSCs cannot meet the needs of commercial applications because of the cracking of perovskite grains caused by bending stress. Here, we introduced a spacer cation additive (2-(chloromethyl) pyridine hydrochloride, CPHC) within the perovskite organic precursor to improve the device PCE and its mechanical stability. We observed that the CPHC spacer cation additive could simultaneously facilitate the crystallization of perovskite and stitch the grain boundaries to improve the flexibility. Compared to the 17.64% PCE of the control devices, the target flexible PSCs achieved a more highly efficiency over 19% with an improved mechanical stability (87.2% of the initial PCE after the 1000 cycles with the bending radius R = 6 mm). In addition, compared to methylammonium or formamidinium cation, due to the stronger hydrophobic and larger activation energy barrier for the ion migration of the CPHC spacer cation, the device retained over 80% of the initial PCE after 30 days storage in an ambient environment. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35497527 PMCID: PMC9042258 DOI: 10.1039/d1ra05399j
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Fig. 1(a) Architecture of a flexible perovskite solar cell. (b) The molecular structure of 2-(chloromethyl) pyridine hydrochloride. Schematic of the perovskite's grain boundary without (c) and with (d) the CPHC treatment.
Fig. 2(a) The champion J–V curves of the control and target device. (b) The corresponding EQE spectra of the target device. (c) The PCE statistics of the control and target devices. (d) Steady-state photocurrent and efficiency of the target device. The J–V curves of the control (e) and target (f) device for reverse scan and forward scan.
Fig. 4(a) Transient photovoltage curves of the different flexible PSCs. (b) Dark J–V curves of the electron-only devices with the different perovskite films. The inset shows the configuration of the devices. (c) Relationship between VOC and light intensity for different devices. (d) The distribution of defects in the perovskite layer obtained by DLCP at 10 kHz with and without the CPHC treatment.
Fig. 3(a) XRD patterns, (b) UV-vis spectra and steady-state PL images, SEM image of the control (c) and target (d) perovskite films. (e) The cross-section HAADF-STEM images of the target perovskite film. EDS was carried out on the grain interior (red rectangle) and grain boundary (red circle). The nano-beam electron diffraction patterns on the grain interior (f) and grain boundary (g).
Fig. 5(a) Normalized PCE value for the flexible PSCs after bending 200 cycles with different bending radii. (b) Normalized PCE value for the flexible PSCs as a function of bending cycles with a radius of 6 mm. (c) Stability characteristics of the different flexible PSCs performed under ambient air conditions.