Heather Kitzman1, Kristen Tecson2, Abdullah Mamun1, Briget da Graca3, Samrat Yeramaneni4, Kenneth Halloran1, Donald Wesson1. 1. Baylor Scott & White Health and Wellness Center, Baylor Scott & White Health, Dallas, TX; Robbins Institute for Health Policy & Leadership, Baylor University, Waco, TX. 2. Baylor Scott & White Heart and Vascular Institute, Baylor Scott & White Health, Dallas, TX. 3. Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX. 4. Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN.
Abstract
Objective: Our objectives were two-fold: 1) To evaluate the benefits of population health strategies focused on social determinants of health and integrated into the primary care medical home (PCMH) and 2) to determine how these strategies impact diabetes and cardiovascular disease outcomes among a low-income, primarily minority community. We also investigated associations between these outcomes and emergency department (ED) and inpatient (IP) use and costs. Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting: Community-based PCMH: Baylor Scott & White Health and Wellness Center (BSW HWC). Patients/Participants: All patients who attended at least two primary care visits at BSW HWC within a 12-month time span from 2011-2015. Methods: Outcomes for patients participating in PCMH only (PCMH) as compared to PCMH plus population health services (PCMH+PoPH) were compared using electronic health record data. Main Outcomes: Diastolic and systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c, ED visits and costs, and IP hospitalizations and costs were examined. Results: From 2011-2015, 445 patients (age=46±12 years, 63% African American, 61% female, 69.5% uninsured) were included. Adjusted regression analyses indicated PCMH+PoPH had greater improvement in diabetes outcomes (prediabetes HbA1c= -.65[SE=.32], P=.04; diabetes HbA1c= -.74 [SE=.37], P<.05) and 37% lower ED costs than the PCMH group (P=.01). Worsening chronic disease risk factors was associated with 39% higher expected ED visits (P<.01), whereas improved chronic disease risk was associated with 32% fewer ED visits (P=.04). Conclusions: Integrating population health services into the PCMH can improve chronic disease outcomes, and impact hospital utilization and cost in un- or under-insured populations.
Objective: Our objectives were two-fold: 1) To evaluate the benefits of population health strategies focused on social determinants of health and integrated into the primary care medical home (PCMH) and 2) to determine how these strategies impact diabetes and cardiovascular disease outcomes among a low-income, primarily minority community. We also investigated associations between these outcomes and emergency department (ED) and inpatient (IP) use and costs. Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting: Community-based PCMH: Baylor Scott & White Health and Wellness Center (BSW HWC). Patients/Participants: All patients who attended at least two primary care visits at BSW HWC within a 12-month time span from 2011-2015. Methods: Outcomes for patients participating in PCMH only (PCMH) as compared to PCMH plus population health services (PCMH+PoPH) were compared using electronic health record data. Main Outcomes: Diastolic and systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c, ED visits and costs, and IP hospitalizations and costs were examined. Results: From 2011-2015, 445 patients (age=46±12 years, 63% African American, 61% female, 69.5% uninsured) were included. Adjusted regression analyses indicated PCMH+PoPH had greater improvement in diabetes outcomes (prediabetes HbA1c= -.65[SE=.32], P=.04; diabetes HbA1c= -.74 [SE=.37], P<.05) and 37% lower ED costs than the PCMH group (P=.01). Worsening chronic disease risk factors was associated with 39% higher expected ED visits (P<.01), whereas improved chronic disease risk was associated with 32% fewer ED visits (P=.04). Conclusions: Integrating population health services into the PCMH can improve chronic disease outcomes, and impact hospital utilization and cost in un- or under-insured populations.
Authors: Margaret Jean Hall; Carol J DeFrances; Sonja N Williams; Aleksandr Golosinskiy; Alexander Schwartzman Journal: Natl Health Stat Report Date: 2010-10-26
Authors: M Obucina; N Harris; J A Fitzgerald; A Chai; K Radford; A Ross; L Carr; N Vecchio Journal: Health Policy Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Paul Crits-Christoph; Robert Gallop; Elizabeth Noll; Aileen Rothbard; Caroline K Diehl; Mary Beth Connolly Gibbons; Robert Gross; Karin V Rhodes Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Dena Ettehad; Connor A Emdin; Amit Kiran; Simon G Anderson; Thomas Callender; Jonathan Emberson; John Chalmers; Anthony Rodgers; Kazem Rahimi Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-12-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: George L Jackson; Benjamin J Powers; Ranee Chatterjee; Janet Prvu Bettger; Alex R Kemper; Vic Hasselblad; Rowena J Dolor; R Julian Irvine; Brooke L Heidenfelder; Amy S Kendrick; Rebecca Gray; John W Williams Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Janice L Clarke; Scott Bourn; Alexis Skoufalos; Eric H Beck; Daniel J Castillo Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 2.459