| Literature DB >> 35497256 |
Jing Tan1, Junli Liu1, Han Wang1, Ying Zhang1,2, Hongqiang Lin1, Zhongyao Wang1, Hanrui Si1, Yutong Zhang1, Jinping Liu1,3, Pingya Li1,3, Kai Sun1.
Abstract
With the aim of identifying the active components of Xueshuan Xinmaining Tablet (XXT) and discussing the potential mechanism involved, the relationship between HPLC fingerprints and its blood-activating effect were established by multivariate statistical analysis, including gray relational analysis (GRA) and partial least squares regression analysis (PLSR). Network pharmacology was used to predict the potential mechanism based on the identified active components. GRA and PLSR analysis showed close correlation between the HPLC fingerprints and blood-activating activity, and peaks P1, P3, P11, P15, P22, P34, P36, P38 and P39 might be potential anti-blood stasis components of XXT. The pharmacological verification showed that salvianic acid A (P1), rutin (P3), ginsenoside Rg1 (P11) and Rb1 (P22), cinobufagin (P36), and tanshinone I (P38) and IIA (P39) had significant blood-activating effects. Based on these seven active compounds, network pharmacology analysis indicated that the anti-blood stasis effect of XXT might be closely related to TNF, PI3K-Akt and NF-κB signaling pathways. The spectrum-effect relationship of XXT was successfully established in this study. The blood-activating components and the anti-blood stasis mechanism were revealed and predicted. These findings could also be beneficial for an exploration of the active components of TCM. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35497256 PMCID: PMC9050128 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra09623j
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1HPLC fingerprints of samples S1–S10 of Xueshuan Xinmaining Tablet (XXT). (S1–S10: 10 kinds of extract with different polar solvents; R: the reference fingerprint).
Fig. 2The reference fingerprint of XXT.
Fig. 3The HPLC spectrum of a mixed standard reference. 1: salvianic aid A; 3: rutin; 4: quercetin; 11, 12, 14, 18, 20, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 32, 33: ginsenoside Rg1, -Re, -Rf, -Rh1, -Rg2, -Rb1, -Rc, -Rb2, -Rb3, -Rd, -Rg3, -F2, -Rh2; 15: salvianolic acid B; 34: cholic acid; 35: hyodeoxycholic acid; 36: cinobufagin; 37: resibufogenin; 38: tanshinone I; 39: tanshinone IIA.
Fig. 4Hierarchical clustering analysis of XXT samples.
The whole blood viscosity (WBV), plasma viscosity (PV), prothrombin time (PT), thrombin time (TT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and fibrinogen (FIB) results from rats (n = 10)a
| Group | WBV (mPa s; expressed at high, medium and low shear rates) | PV (mPa s; 120/s) | PT (INR) | TT (s) | APTT (s) | FIB (g L−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/s | 60/s | 120/s | ||||||
| N | 6.9 ± 0.9 | 5.6 ± 0.4 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 1.27 ± 0.08 | 27 ± 2 | 41 ± 3 | 22 ± 2 | 1.7 ± 0.8 |
| M | 8.0 ± 0.5## | 6.1 ± 0.4# | 5.6 ± 0.4# | 1.8 ± 0.3## | 24.1 ± 0.7## | 35 ± 1## | 18.3 ± 1.0## | 3.7 ± 0.5## |
| BCN | 7.0 ± 0.4** | 5.4 ± 0.5** | 5.0 ± 0.4* | 1.4 ± 0.2** | 26.2 ± 0.7** | 40 ± 1** | 20 ± 2** | 2.4 ± 0.8* |
| S1 | 7.6 ± 0.4 | 5.6 ± 0.4* | 5.2 ± 0.4* | 1.51 ± 0.07* | 23.8 ± 0.8 | 36.2 ± 0.2 | 18.6 ± 0.3 | 2.2 ± 0.8** |
| S2 | 7.3 ± 0.8* | 5.6 ± 0.5* | 5.2 ± 0.5* | 1.4 ± 0.4* | 24.8 ± 0.7* | 38 ± 1** | 20.1 ± 0.6** | 2.1 ± 0.8** |
| S3 | 7.2 ± 0.5** | 5.7 ± 0.4 | 4.9 ± 0.5** | 1.4 ± 0.5* | 25.1 ± 0.8* | 38 ± 1** | 20 ± 2** | 2.9 ± 0.8* |
| S4 | 6.8 ± 0.4** | 5.4 ± 0.4** | 4.9 ± 0.4** | 1.3 ± 0.3** | 26.7 ± 0.7** | 41 ± 1** | 21 ± 1** | 2.0 ± 0.8** |
| S5 | 6.9 ± 0.4** | 5.5 ± 0.5* | 5.0 ± 0.4** | 1.4 ± 0.4* | 26.3 ± 0.7** | 40 ± 1** | 20 ± 2* | 2.0 ± 0.8** |
| S6 | 7.3 ± 0.6** | 5.7 ± 0.3 | 5.2 ± 0.2* | 1.5 ± 0.3* | 24.9 ± 0.7* | 38 ± 1** | 18.8 ± 0.6* | 2.1 ± 0.8** |
| S7 | 6.9 ± 0.5** | 5.4 ± 0.5** | 5.0 ± 0.5** | 1.3 ± 0.3** | 26.2 ± 0.6** | 40 ± 1** | 21.0 ± 0.6** | 2.0 ± 0.8** |
| S8 | 7.1 ± 0.3** | 5.7 ± 0.3* | 5.2 ± 0.3* | 1.4 ± 0.3** | 25.3 ± 0.8** | 39 ± 1** | 21 ± 2** | 2.1 ± 0.8** |
| S9 | 7.3 ± 0.6** | 5.7 ± 0.6 | 5.2 ± 0.5 | 1.4 ± 0.1** | 25.0 ± 0.7* | 38 ± 1** | 21 ± 1** | 2.1 ± 0.8** |
| S10 | 7.3 ± 0.5** | 5.7 ± 0.7 | 5.1 ± 0.5* | 1.4 ± 0.3* | 24.9 ± 0.7* | 38 ± 1** | 20 ± 2** | 2.1 ± 0.8** |
Note: the data represent x̄ ± s; compared with the M group, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. Compared with the N group, #p < 0.05; ##p < 0.01.
Correlation coefficient analysis between peaks and WBV and APTT
| Peak no. | WBV (mPa s−1; 10/s) | APTT (s) | Peak no. | WBV (mPa s−1; 10/s) | APTT (s) | Peak no. | WBV (mPa s−1; 10/s) | APTT (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 15 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 29 | 0.78 | 0.80 |
| 2 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 16 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 30 | 0.68 | 0.68 |
| 3 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 17 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 31 | 0.78 | 0.79 |
| 4 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 18 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 32 | 0.69 | 0.70 |
| 5 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 19 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 33 | 0.77 | 0.77 |
| 6 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 20 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 34 | 0.83 | 0.84 |
| 7 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 21 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 35 | 0.72 | 0.74 |
| 8 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 22 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 36 | 0.80 | 0.82 |
| 9 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 23 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 37 | 0.79 | 0.79 |
| 10 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 24 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 38 | 0.82 | 0.84 |
| 11 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 25 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 39 | 0.79 | 0.80 |
| 12 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 26 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 40 | 0.78 | 0.79 |
| 13 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 27 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 41 | 0.80 | 0.81 |
| 14 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 28 | 0.81 | 0.84 |
Fig. 5The results of profile–efficacy analysis by partial least squares regression analysis (PLSR). (A) Regression coefficients between 41 common peaks and WBV, (B) regression coefficients between 41 common peaks and APTT, (C) variable importance in projection (VIP) values of 41 common peaks to WBV, and (D) VIP values of 41 common peaks to APTT.
Fig. 6The effects on the coagulation parameters of predicted compounds: (A) PT, (B) TT, (C) APTT, and (D) FIB. Data are expressed as mean ± SD for three independent experiments. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc Dunnett's test. **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 are significant compared to the control.
Fig. 7The active compound–target network.
Fig. 8The Venn diagram of active ingredient targets (A) and blood stasis-associated targets (B).
Fig. 9The target–target network from the STRING database.
Fig. 10A Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis histogram of the active components in XXT.
Fig. 11A KEGG enrichment pathway bubble map of the main active components in XXT.
The KEGG pathways and corresponding targets in XXT
| No. | Pathway | Count | Target name |
|---|---|---|---|
| hsa04024 | cAMP signaling pathway | 7 | EDNRA, AKT1, FOS, ADRB2, ADRB1, RELA, NFKBIA |
| hsa04668 | TNF signaling pathway | 12 | VCAM1, AKT1, ICAM1, FOS, IL6, TNF, PTGS2, RELA, MMP9, EDN1, NFKBIA, IL1B |
| hsa04066 | HIF-1 signaling pathway | 9 | AKT1, IL6, INS, RELA, BCL2, EDN1, VEGFA, NOS3, TIMP1 |
| hsa04064 | NF-kappa B signaling pathway | 8 | VCAM1, ICAM1, TNF, PTGS2, RELA, BCL2, NFKBIA, IL1B |
| hsa04151 | PI3K-Akt signaling pathway | 11 | AKT1, IL6, INS, RELA, RXRA, BCL2, COL3A1, VEGFA, TP53, NOS3, ITGB3 |
| hsa04071 | Sphingolipid signaling pathway | 6 | AKT1, TNF, RELA, BCL2, TP53, NOS3 |
| hsa04010 | MAPK signaling pathway | 7 | AKT1, FOS, TNF, RELA, TP53, IL1B, TGFB1 |
| hsa04370 | VEGF signaling pathway | 4 | AKT1, PTGS2, VEGFA, NOS3 |
| hsa04611 | Platelet activation | 6 | AKT1, COL3A1, PTGS1, TBXA2R, NOS3, ITGB3 |
| hsa04210 | Apoptosis | 6 | AKT1, TNF, RELA, BCL2, TP53, NFKBIA |
| hsa04150 | mTOR signaling pathway | 3 | AKT1, TNF, INS |
| hsa00590 | Arachidonic acid metabolism | 4 | PTGS2, PTGS1, LTA4H, ALOX5 |
| hsa04640 | Hematopoietic cell lineage | 4 | IL6, TNF, IL1B, ITGB3 |
| hsa04621 | NOD-like receptor signaling pathway | 5 | IL6, TNF, RELA, NFKBIA, IL1B |
Fig. 12The active compound–target–pathway network map.