| Literature DB >> 35497028 |
Habibur Rahman1, Farjana Yeasmin2, Tarikul Islam1, Mahmudul Hasan3, Muhamad Borhan Uddin4, Ruhul Amin Khan4.
Abstract
The hybridization effect of agro-waste pineapple leaf fibre (PALF) and jute fibre as reinforcement in linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) composites was investigated in this work. The samples were fabricated by using the heat press compression moulding. The effect of gamma irradiation on composite physico-mechanical properties was also investigated in order to determine the best gamma dose among 2.50, 5.00, 7.50, and 10.00 kGy. The composite sample containing 40% PALF and 60% jute (with a total weight of 50% fibres) demonstrated the most feasible tensile strength (33.36 ± 0.59 MPa), tensile modulus (1494.41 ± 10.94 MPa), elongation at break (50.92 ± 0.77%), bending strength (82.58 ± 0.49 MPa), bending modulus (4932.46 ± 96.12 MPa), and impact strength (34.38 ± 0.42 kJ/m2) at 7.50 kGy irradiation. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) determined the thermal performance of the samples. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images at the tensile fracture surfaces of composites revealed the interfacial interaction between reinforcement fibres and matrix.Entities:
Keywords: Gamma irradiation; Hybrid composites; Jute; LLDPE; PALF; Physico-mechanical properties
Year: 2022 PMID: 35497028 PMCID: PMC9043988 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09287
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Physico-mechanical characteristics of jute fibre, PALF and LLDPE.
| Types | Tensile strength (MPa) | Linear density (tex) | Tenacity (g/tex) | Breaking elongation (%) | Young's modulus (MPa) | Density (g/cm3) | Moisture regain (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jute | 653.21 ± 6.31 | 2.02 ± 0.03 | 26.62 ± 0.21 | 1.04 ± 0.01 | 14783.12 ± 36.14 | 1.34 ± 0.01 | 13.70 ± 0.12 |
| PALF | 1572.32 ± 47.43 | 2.50 ± 0.06 | 100.08 ± 0.48 | 2.69 ± 0.04 | 6260.64 ± 47.39 | 1.53 ± 0.02 | 12.00 ± 0.11 |
| LLDPE | 8.61 ± 0.13 | - | - | 136.46 ± 0.56 | 146.72 ± 5.28 | 0.918 ± 0.01 | - |
Jute-PALF reinforcement and LLDPE matrix ratio in composite samples.
| Sample ID | LLDPE (wt.% of composite) | Fibres (50 wt.% of composite) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PALF (wt.% of fibres) | Jute (wt.% of fibres) | ||
| LP8J2 | 50 | 80 | 20 |
| LP7J3 | 50 | 70 | 30 |
| LP6J4 | 50 | 60 | 40 |
| LP5J5 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| LP4J6 | 50 | 40 | 60 |
| LP3J7 | 50 | 30 | 70 |
Figure 1Tensile strength of composite samples.
Figure 2Tensile modulus of composite samples.
Figure 3Elongation at break (%) of composite samples.
Figure 4Bending strength of composite samples.
Figure 5Bending modulus of composite samples.
Figure 6Impact strength of composite samples.
Tensile strength (TS), tensile modulus (TM), elongation percentage at break (EB%), bending strength (BS), bending modulus (BM) and impact strength (IS) of the sample LP4J6 at different irradiation.
| Irradiation dose (kGy) | Sample LP4J6: 50% LLDPE and 50% fibres (40% PALF and 60% jute fibre) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TS (MPa) | TM (MPa) | EB (%) | BS (MPa) | BM (MPa) | IS (kJ/m2) | |
| Non-irradiated | 26.01 ± 0.31 | 1044.06 ± 17.61 | 58.82 ± 0.19 | 74.65 ± 0.68 | 3842.19 ± 65.37 | 25.53 ± 0.50 |
| 2.50 | 28.02 ± 0.19 | 1194.35 ± 16.86 | 56.82 ± 0.94 | 76.70 ± 0.24 | 4133.68 ± 91.08 | 28.25 ± 0.55 |
| 5.00 | 30.72 ± 0.58 | 1328.00 ± 19.63 | 55.47 ± 1.06 | 78.92 ± 0.42 | 4495.86 ± 33.28 | 30.66 ± 0.55 |
| 7.50 | 33.36 ± 0.59 | 1494.41 ± 10.94 | 50.92 ± 0.77 | 82.58 ± 0.49 | 4932.46 ± 96.12 | 34.38 ± 0.42 |
| 10.00 | 32.10 ± 0.34 | 1428.21 ± 19.61 | 52.67 ± 0.55 | 80.91 ± 0.70 | 4762.89 ± 57.87 | 32.85 ± 0.47 |
Figure 7TGA of the sample LP4J6 at (a) 5.00 kGy, (b) 7.50 kGy and (c) 10.00 kGy irradiation.
Figure 8SEM images of the sample LP4J6 on tensile fracture surface irradiated at (a) non-irradiated, (b) 5.00 kGy, (c–e) 7.50 kGy, and (f) 10.00 kGy.