| Literature DB >> 35496878 |
Mei-Xi Li1,2, Lei Li1,3, Si-Yuan Zhou1,2, Jian-Hua Cao1, Wei-Hua Liang1, Ye Tian1,4, Xue-Tao Shi5, Xiu-Bin Yang6, Da-Yong Wu1.
Abstract
In blood vessels, endothelial cells (ECs) grow along the direction of blood flow, while smooth muscle cells (SMCs) grow circumferentially along the vessel wall. To mimic this structure, a polycaprolactone (PCL) tubular scaffold with orthogonally oriented bilayer nanofibers was prepared via electrospinning and winding. ECs were cultured on the inner layer of the scaffold with axial nanofibers and SMCs were cultured on the outer layer of the scaffold with circumferential nanofibers. Fluorescence images of the F-actin distribution of ECs and SMCs indicated that cells adhered, stretched, and proliferated in an oriented manner on the scaffold. Moreover, layers of ECs and SMCs formed on the scaffold after one month of incubation. The expression levels of platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM-1) and a contractile SMC phenotype marker in the EC/SMC co-culture system were much higher than those in individual culture systems, thus demonstrating that the proposed biomimetic scaffold promoted the intercellular junction of ECs and preserved the contractile phenotype of SMCs. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35496878 PMCID: PMC9041441 DOI: 10.1039/d1ra04472a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1Schematic diagrams of (a) the orthogonal bilayer PCL scaffold preparation, (b) heparinization, and (c) cell seeding on the scaffold.
Primer sequences used in the experiments
| genes | Primer F (5′–3′) | Primer R (5′–3′) |
|---|---|---|
| α-SMA | CGAAGCACAGAGCAAAAGAGG | TCAGGGGCAACACGAAGC |
| OPN | CAGTGATTTGCTTTTGCCTCC | TGGCTTTCGTTGGACTTACTTG |
| GAPDH | AATCCCATCACCATCTTC | AGGCTGTTGTCATACTTC |
Fig. 2(a) A picture of the PCL tubular scaffold. (b) SEM image of the PCL tubular scaffold. (c) Distribution of the orientation angles between the long axes of the nanofibers and their expected directions. (d) Mechanical properties of the orthogonal-bilayer PCL tubular scaffold.
Fig. 3(a) FTIR spectra of PCL, heparinized PCL and heparin. (b) Contact angle of water on PCL. (c) Contact angle of water on heparinized PCL.
Fig. 4(a) Fluorescence images of ECs and SMCs seeded on the heparinized PCL film with random and aligned fibers. After 2, 4, 6, and 8 days of incubation, the cells were stained with phalloidin (green) and DAPI (blue). (b) SEM images of ECs and SMCs on the aligned and random PCL films after 2 days of incubation.
The angle between the spread of the cytoskeleton and horizontal direction
| Orientation | Angle (°) |
|---|---|
| EC (random) | 50.5 ± 16.0 |
| EC (aligned) | 19.0 ± 8.6 |
| SMC (random) | 84.4 ± 45.9 |
| SMC (aligned) | 82.0 ± 4.4 |
Fig. 5(a) Fluorescent staining images and SEM images of ECs on the inner layer and SMCs on the outer layer of the PCL tubular scaffold after 10 days of co-culture. The F-actin filaments and nucleus of ECs and SMCs were stained with phalloidin and DAPI solution, respectively. (b) Histological cross-section of the tubular scaffold seeded with ECs and SMCs stained with H&E after one month of co-culture.
Fig. 6(a) Fluorescence staining images and (b) quantified fluorescence intensity of CD31 in ECs on the EC/SMC co-culture scaffold and ECs-only culture scaffold. Scale bars are 10 μm. The CD31 and nucleus of ECs and SMCs were stained with mouse anti-CD31 antibody and DAPI solution, respectively. (c) Real-time PCR histogram of α-SMA and OPN of SMCs on the EC/SMC co-culture scaffold (α-SMA: 20.92 ± 0.91%; OPN: 1.09 ± 0.29%) and SMCs-only culture scaffold (α-SMA: 9.61 ± 0.73%; OPN: 2.86 ± 0.51%). The data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Student's two-tailed t-test was performed to calculate p. Samples were deemed significantly different at a p-value < 0.05 (n = 3).