| Literature DB >> 35496793 |
Ana C Parente-Pereira1, Richard E Beatson1,2, David M Davies1,3, Caroline Hull1,3, Lynsey M Whilding1, Joanna C Porter2,4, John Maher1,3,5.
Abstract
Clinical trials that tested the antitumor activity of γδ T cells have been mostly unsuccessful. To address this, we expanded human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in TGFβ1, a cytokine which enhances their viability, trafficking properties, and intrinsic antitumor activity. This protocol summarizes the production and in vitro functional characterization of TGFβ1 educated human Vγ9Vδ2 cells and highlights their compatibility with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) engineering. We also describe in vivo testing of the antitumor activity of these CAR T cells in mice. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Beatson et al. (2021).Entities:
Keywords: Biotechnology and bioengineering; Cancer; Cell Biology; Cell culture; Cell-based Assays; Flow Cytometry/Mass Cytometry; Health Sciences; Immunology; Model Organisms; Molecular Biology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35496793 PMCID: PMC9043756 DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101319
Source DB: PubMed Journal: STAR Protoc ISSN: 2666-1667
Figure 1Assessment of differentiation state of γδ[T2] and γδ[2] cells
Cells were co-stained with anti-γδ TCR-FITC, CD27-PE and CD45RA-APC antibodies. Quadrant settings were determined using isotype controls. Note the less differentiated nature of γδ[T2] cells. CM – central memory; EM- effector memory; Term – terminally differentiated cells.
Figure 2Real time cytolytic activity of γδ[T2] and γδ[2] cells
In this example, MDA-MB-231 tumor cells were added to a 96 well electronic microtiter plate. Zoledronic acid (3 μg/mL) and either γδ[2] or γδ[T2] cells were added after 24 and 48 h respectively. Tumor cell number is normalized to the number present at the time of γδ T cell addition (“normalized cell index”).
Figure 3Cytokine release by γδ[T2] and γδ[2] cells
γδ[2] cells and γδ[T2] cells were co-cultivated with the indicated triple negative breast cancer monolayers (5:1 E:T ratio) that had been pulsed 24 h earlier with ZOL or PAM at concentrations specified. Release of IFN-γ and IL-2 was measured by ELISA in supernatants collected after 24 h. All data show mean + SD of n=3–5 replicates. All statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA, making comparison between γδ[2] cells and γδ[T2] cells. ∗ p<0.05; ∗∗ p<0.01; ∗∗ p<0.001;∗∗∗∗ p<0.0001; NS – not significant.
Figure 4Tumor cytolytic activity of γδ[T2] and γδ[2] cells
γδ[2] cells and γδ[T2] cells were co-cultivated with the indicated ovarian cancer monolayers (5:1 E:T ratio) that had been pulsed 24 h earlier with ZOL (at concentrations specified). Black lines represent monolayers without the addition of γδ cells. Residual tumor cell viability was measured after 72 h by MTT assay. All data show mean + SD of n=3–6 replicates. All statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA, making comparison between γδ[2] cells and γδ[T2] cells. NS – not significant.
Figure 5Basement membrane extract invasion by γδ[T2] and γδ[2] cells
(A) γδ[2] or γδ[T2] cells were placed on BME within ThinCertsTM which were placed in TexMACSTM+. Cells that invaded into the lower well were enumerated at the indicated time points (n=8 per group).
(B) The experiment in A was repeated in the presence of a blocking antibody directed against CD11a or an isotype control (mean +/- SD, n=4). Invaded cells (%) were measured at 48 h. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired Student’s t-test.
Figure 6Expression of the pCAR H/T parallel CAR in retrovirus-engineered γδ[T2] cells
The structure of pCAR H/T is shown schematically on the left. A representative example of flow cytometric analysis of γδ[T2] cells that express pCAR H/T are shown in the middle. Expansion of pCAR H/T γδ[T2] cells is shown on the right, expressed as fold increase in total cell number Note similar expansion efficiency to untrans(duced) γδ[T2] cells.
Staining of CAR expression in transduced γδ[2] and γδ[T2] cells
| Tube | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ut1 | anti-human γδ TCR-FITC | Detect Ut γδ T-cells | ||
| Ut2 | Isotype FITC | Set baseline FITC signal to detect Ut γδ T-cells | ||
| Ut3 | Anti-EGF biotin | Streptavidin PE | Set baseline APC signal to detect transduced cells (highest of Ut3 vs Td2) | |
| Td1 | anti-human γδ TCR-FITC | Detect γδ T cells in transduced population. Should correlate with number identified in Td2 and Td3 tubes | ||
| Td2 | anti-human γδ TCR-FITC | Streptavidin PE | Set baseline APC signal to detect transduced cells (highest of Ut3 vs Td2) | |
| Td3 | anti-human γδ TCR-FITC | Anti-EGF biotin | Streptavidin PE | Detect transduced γδ T-cells |
Figure 7BxPC3 tumor cell killing by pCAR H/T-engineered γδ[T2] cells
(A) Cytotoxicity assay in which untrans(duced) or pCAR-H/T transduced γδ[T2] cells were co-cultured at the indicated effector:target (E:T) ratio with ffLuc+ BxPC3 tumor cells for 48 h. Tumor cell viability was determined by luciferase assay (mean +/- SD, n=4).
(B) Replicate cytotoxicity assays conducted at a 1:1 E:T ratio for 48 h (mean +/- SD).
(C) Firefly luciferase BxPC3 tumor cells were co-cultivated with untrans(duced) or pCAR-H/T transduced γδ[T2] cells. Tumor cell viability was measured after 3–4 days. If >25% tumor cell killing occurred, γδ[T2] cells were re-stimulated by transfer to a new tumor cell monolayer. Total number of successful re-stimulation cycles is shown. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired Student’s t test.
Figure 8In vivo anti-tumor activity of pCAR H/T-engineered γδ[T2] cells
1 × 105 ffLuc+ BxPC3 tumor cells were injected i.p. in NSG mice. After 12 days, mice were treated with 10 × 106 untrans(duced) or pCAR-H/T transduced γδ[T2] cells, making comparison with PBS. Serial BLI emission is shown (mean +/- SD, n=3). Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired Student’s t test.
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| Anti-human/primate EGF biotinylated – 1/150 dilution | R&D Systems | Cat# BAF236; RRID: |
| CD27 – PE (M-T271) | BioLegend UK | Cat# 356405, RRID: |
| CD45RA – BV605/ APC (HI100) | BioLegend UK | Cat# 304150, RRID: |
| PE Goat anti-mouse IgG | BioLegend UK | Cat# 405307 |
| Streptavidin PE (SA-PE) - – 1/150 dilution | BioLegend UK | Cat# 405203 |
| TCR Pan γδ purified (11F2) – coat plates with 0.8 mg/mL | BD Biosciences | Cat# 347900, RRID: |
| TCR Pan γδ - FITC (B1) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 559878, RRID: |
| Mouse IgG1 FITC isotype | BD Biosciences | Cat# 345815, RRID: |
| Ultra-LEAF CD11a blocking antibody – block with 10 μg/mL | BioLegend UK | Cat# 301233, RRID: |
| Ultra-LEAF Mouse IgG1 LEAF – block with 10 μg/mL | BioLegend UK | Cat# 400166, No RRID available |
| Ultra-LEAF Pan γδ TCR (B1) - coat plates with 0.8 mg/mL | BioLegend UK | Cat# 331235, RRID: |
| DH5α | New England Biolabs | Cat# c2987h |
| SFG retroviral vector | Dr Michel Sadelain, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center | N/A |
| Human blood | Healthy volunteers, male and female, aged 18–65 years | Approved by the West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee 3 (REC reference 18/WS/0047) |
| Antibiotic antimycotic (100×) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# 15240062 |
| Bovine serum albumin | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# A9418 |
| D-luciferin | Cambridge Bioscience | Cat# B3000-1G |
| DMEM medium | Lonza | Cat# BE12-604Q |
| Disodium edetate (EDTA) | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# BP1224 |
| Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm (EHS) basement membrane extract (BME) | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# 126-2.5 |
| Fetal bovine serum | Gibco | Cat# 26140079 |
| Ficoll®-Paque PLUS | GE Healthcare | Cat# GE17-1440-02 |
| GeneJuice® transfection reagent | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# 70967-3 |
| Isoflurane | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# 792632 |
| L-Glutamine solution | Sigma-Aldrich | G7513-100ML |
| Luciferin | Regis Technologies | Cat# 115144-35-9 |
| MTT | Apollo Scientific | Cat# BID2165 |
| Pamidronate sodium | Pfizer Ltd. | N/A |
| PBS | Sigma-Aldrich | D8537 |
| Proleukin (aldesleukin), human recombinant interleukin (IL)-2 | Clinigen Group | N/A |
| Recombinant Human TGF-β1 | Bio-Techne | Cat# 240-B |
| RetroNectin® recombinant human fibronectin fragment | Takara Bio | Cat# T100B |
| Sodium Citrate | USP | 1613859 |
| TexMACSTM medium | Miltenyi Biotec | 130-097-196 |
| Trypan Blue | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# T8154 |
| Zometa | Novartis | N/A |
| Human uncoated IL-2 ELISA kit | Life Technologies Ltd | Cat# 88-7025-88 |
| Human IFN-gamma DUOset ELISA | Bio-Techne | Cat# DY285B |
| BT-20 | Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, King’s College London | ATCC Cat# HTB-19 |
| BxPC-3 | Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London | ATCC Cat# CRL-1687 |
| HEK293T | ATCC | Cat# CRL-3216 |
| MDA-MB-231 | Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, King’s College London | ATCC Cat# HTB-26 |
| MDA-MB-468 | Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, King’s College London | ATCC Cat# HTB-132 |
| Ovsaho | Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources Cell Bank | Cat# JCRB1046 |
| PG13 | European Collection of Authenticated Cell Culture | Cat# 95110215 |
| TOV-21G | Prof Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami, Imperial College London | ATCC Cat# CRL-11730 RRID: CVCL_3613 |
| NOD.Cg-PrkdcSCID Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mice, male and female, aged 6–10 weeks | Charles River | Strain code: 614 |
| PeqPam plasmid | Gift of Dr M Pule, University College London | N/A |
| CAR Mechanics Group, King’s College London | ( | |
| RDF plasmid | Gift of Prof M Collins, University College London | N/A |
| FlowJo v.10 Software | Tree Star | |
| Gene Designer | DNA2.0 | |
| Prism 9 | GraphPad | |
| SnapGene | GSL Biotech | |
| Adhesive PCR Plate Seals | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# AB0558 |
| MicroAmp™ Optical 96-Well Reaction Plate | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# n8010560 |
| RTCA E-plates | Agilent | Cat# 300601010 |
| Sodium heparin blood collection tubes | BD Biosciences | Cat# 367874 |
| ThinCertTM inserts for 24 well plates (6.5 mm, 3 μm pore size) | Greiner Bio-One | Cat# 662631 |
| xCELLigence RTCA MP | Agilent | N/A |
| BD LSRFortessaTM X-20 | BD Biosciences | N/A |
TexMACSTM+ medium
| Reagent | Final concentration | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| TexMACSTM medium | ×1 | 490 mL |
| L-Glutamine (×100) | 2 mM | 5 mL |
| Antibiotic Antimycotic (×100) | ×1 | 5 mL |
| N/A | 500 mL |
D10 medium
| Reagent | Final concentration | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| DMEM medium | ×1 | 440 mL |
| Fetal bovine serum | 10% | 50 mL |
| L-Glutamine (×100) | 2 mM | 5 mL |
| Antibiotic Antimycotic (×100) | ×1 | 5 mL |
| N/A | 500 mL |
FACS buffer
| Reagent | Final concentration | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| PBS | ×1 | 99 mL |
| Disodium edetate (0.5 M stock) | 0.5 mM | 100 μL |
| Fetal bovine serum | 1% | 1 mL |
| N/A | 100 mL |
Equipment
| Flow cytometer | Analytical software | Version |
|---|---|---|
| BD LSRFortessaTM X-20 | FlowJoTM | V10.8.1 |