| Literature DB >> 35496239 |
Dragan Marinkovic1, Drazenka Macak1, Dejan M Madic1, Goran Sporis2, Dalija Kuvacic3, Dajana Jasic2,4, Vilko Petric5, Marijan Spehnjak6, Aleksandra Projovic7, Zoran Gojkovic8.
Abstract
Study in the period of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown and the effect of different exercise training programs on the quality of life (QoL) dimension are limited. This randomized control study as a part of which the impact of an 8-week neuromuscular training program on the 90 healthy young individuals' QoL after COVID-19 lockdown was assessed using a short form of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire comprising of four domains (physical health, psychological health, social relations, and the environment). The intervention group (NT) (n = 47) took part in a neuromuscular training program consisting of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization and whole-body vibration training. In contrast, the control group (CG) (n = 43) did not participate in any programmed physical activity. From pre- to post-intervention test, the NT group significantly and substantially improved [mean change (95% CI)] all the QoL domains, physical for 12.78 scores (8.89, 16.64), psychological for 13.12 scores (9.51, 16.74), social relationships for 20.57 scores (16.12, 25.02), and environmental for 24.40 scores (21.45, 27.35). These results suggest that the NT program could enhance QoL in young and healthy participants following COVID-19 lockdown.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; exercise; neuromuscular training; quality of life; well-being
Year: 2022 PMID: 35496239 PMCID: PMC9041163 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.844678
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Characteristics of participants.
| Variables | TOTAL ( | NT ( | CG ( |
| Gender (male/female) | 45/45 | 24/23 | 21/22 |
| Age(years) | 23.94 ± 1.9 | 23.73 ± 2.05 | 24.16 ± 1.89 |
| Weight (kg) | 66.8 ± 12.0 | 67.41 ± 12.51 | 68.17 ± 11.63 |
| Height (cm) | 174.9 ± 8.98 | 174.92 ± 9.44 | 174.87 ± 8.39 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.0 ± 2.6 | 21.85 ± 2.44 | 22.18 ± 2.87 |
Data is presented as AM ± SD. AM, arithmetic mean; SD, standard deviation; NT, neuromuscular training group; CG, Control group.
FIGURE 1Flow diagram of participant enrollment, allocation, and analysis.
Baseline values of outcomes for neuromuscular training (NT) group (n = 47) and control group (CG) (n = 43).
| Outcomes | NT | CG |
| Mean [95% CI] | Mean [95% CI] | |
| Physical QoL (score) | 49.16 [46.65, 51.68] | 47.92 [45.61, 50.24] |
| Psychological QoL (score) | 51.33 [48.89, 53.78] | 50.10 [47.57, 52.62] |
| Social Relationship QoL (score) | 52.31 [48.82, 55.79] | 53.10 [49.79, 56.41] |
| Environmental QoL (score) | 49.53 [47.38, 51.68] | 50.29 [48.26, 52.32] |
FIGURE 2Effect sizes with 95% CIs (Hedges’s gav) for pre-post changes of Physical, Psychological, Social Relationships, Environmental QoL domains in the NT and CG.