| Literature DB >> 35496062 |
Yu Ji1, Ling Shi1, Qi Cheng1, Wen-Wen Fu1, Pei-Pei Zhong1, Shui-Qin Huang1, Xiao-Lin Chen1, Xiao-Rong Wu1.
Abstract
Aim: Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) was used to analyze changes in functional connectivity (FC) within various brain networks and functional network connectivity (FNC) among various brain regions in patients with high myopia (HM).Entities:
Keywords: functional connectivity; functional network connectivity; high myopia; independent component analysis; resting state network
Year: 2022 PMID: 35496062 PMCID: PMC9051506 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.870350
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Hum Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5161 Impact factor: 3.169
Demographic and clinical characteristics of HM and HC groups.
| Characteristic | HM | HC |
| Men/women | 41/48 | 24/35 |
| Age (years) | 26.23 ± 5.462 | 25.78 ± 3.102 |
| ALM (OD) | 26.67 ± 0.874 | 23.90 ± 0.971 |
| ALM (OS) | 26.58 ± 0.985 | 23.74 ± 0.693 |
Abbreviations: HM, high myopia; HC, healthy control; ALM, axial length; OD, oculus dexter; OS, oculus sinister.
FIGURE 1Typical spatial patterns of each RSN in HM group: visual network (VN), auditory network (AN), cerebellar network (CER), default mode network (DMN), sensorimotor network (SMN), saliency network (SN), executive control network (ECN), and dorsal attention network (DAN).
FIGURE 2In the HM group, 11 brain regions of RSNs were significantly different (P < 0.01; GRF correction, cluster-level P < 0.05): visual network 1 (VN1), auditory network 1 (AN1), default mode network 1 (DMN1), significance network (SN), dorsal attention network (DAN), default mode network 2 (DMN2), auditory network 2 (AN2), visual network 3 (VN3), default mode network 3 (DMN3), sensorimotor network (SMN), and executive control network (ECN). BrainNet Viewer images show increased (warm colors) and decreased (cool colors) FC connectivities in the HM group.
Intranetwork FCs of RSNs in the HM group.
| RSN | Brain region | BA | Peak t-score | MNI coordinates (x, y, z) | Cluster size (voxels) |
| VN1 | R-MOG | 19 | 4.6526 | 45, −75, 3 | 109 |
| AN1 | L-MTG | – | –4.4648 | −42, −36, 0 | 64 |
| L-STG | 42 | 4.1556 | −63, −18, 9 | 108 | |
| DMN1 | L-CAU | 24 | –4.4368 | 6, 21, −3 | 96 |
| R-ACC | – | –4.367 | 9, 42, 12 | 95 | |
| SN | L-INS | – | 4.8092 | −42, −18, 15 | 42 |
| L-MOG | – | –4.3905 | −33, −81, 21 | 37 | |
| DAN | L-IPG | – | 4.9254 | −54, −21, 36 | 244 |
| DMN2 | R-SFGmed | – | 5.5267 | 12, 48, 15 | 187 |
| R-MCC | 32 | 5.2192 | 3, 21, 30 | 95 | |
| L-MCC | – | –3.9378 | −6, −24, 39 | 60 | |
| AN2 | L-PoCG | – | 4.6387 | −36, −18, 45 | 186 |
| VN3 | R-CAL | 17 | 3.3681 | 15, −81, 6 | 74 |
| DMN3 | L-PCNU | – | –4.1643 | −6, −57, 18 | 52 |
| L-ANG | – | 4.3362 | −57, −54, 21 | 40 | |
| R-PCNU | 7 | 4.1531 | 6, −63, 42 | 59 | |
| SMN | L-PoCG | 4 | 4.8034 | −42, −15, 54 | 221 |
| R-PreCG | 6 | 4.4296 | 24, −18, 57 | 244 | |
| ECN | R-MTG | 21 | –5.1214 | 66, −27, 0 | 47 |
| L-MFG | 6 | 4.2445 | −24, 12, 60 | 84 | |
| L-IPG | – | 3.4223 | −45, −39, 48 | 32 | |
| L-SFGmed | – | 3.5085 | 0, 36, 45 | 41 |
The statistical threshold was set at the voxel level with P < 0.01 for multiple comparisons using Gaussian random field theory (voxel-level P < 0.01, GRF correction, cluster-level P < 0.05). The t-score represents the statistical value of peak voxels showing differences in FC between the two groups. Abbreviations: MOG, middle occipital gyrus; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; STG, superior temporal gyrus; CAU, caudate nucleus; ACC, anterior cingulate and paracingulate gyri; INS, insula; IPG, inferior parietal; SFGmed, superior frontal gyrus, medial; MCC, median cingulate and paracingulate gyri; PoCG, postcentral gyrus; CAL, calcarine fissure and surrounding cortex; PCNU, precuneus; ANG, angular gyrus; PreCG, precentral gyrus; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; R, right; L, left; BA, brodmann area; MNI, montreal neurologic institute.
FIGURE 3(A) Analysis of whole-brain functional network connectivity intensity allowed calculation of differences between HM and HC groups (P < 0.05, two-sample t-test). Yellow lines represent better functional connectivity than in HC group, while blue lines represent weaker functional connectivity than in HC group. (B) Group averaged static functional connectivity between independent component pairs was computed using overall resting state data. Values in the correlation matrix represent Fisher’s z-transformed Pearson correlation coefficients.