| Literature DB >> 35496020 |
Azin Babaei1, Chris Dreessen1, Michele Sessolo1, Henk J Bolink1.
Abstract
In perovskite solar cells, the choice of appropriate transport layers and electrodes is of great importance to guarantee efficient charge transport and collection, minimizing recombination losses. The possibility to sequentially process multiple layers by vacuum methods offers a tool to explore the effects of different materials and their combinations on the performance of optoelectronic devices. In this work, the effect of introducing interlayers and altering the electrode work function has been evaluated in fully vacuum-deposited perovskite solar cells. We compared the performance of solar cells employing common electron buffer layers such as bathocuproine (BCP), with other injection materials used in organic light-emitting diodes, such as lithium quinolate (Liq), as well as their combination. Additionally, high voltage solar cells were obtained using low work function metal electrodes, although with compromised stability. Solar cells with enhanced photovoltage and stability under continuous operation were obtained using BCP and BCP/Liq interlayers, resulting in an efficiency of approximately 19%, which is remarkable for simple methylammonium lead iodide absorbers. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35496020 PMCID: PMC9049725 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra00214c
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1(a) Flat band energy diagram of the materials used as electron transport/injection layers and electrodes. (b) Device schematics with thickness of all layers and highlight of the five different device structures studied in the paper.
Fig. 2(a) Representative J–V curves measured under simulated solar illumination in forward (short to open circuit) and reverse (open to short circuit) scan direction for each studied device. Due to the lack of hysteresis the two scans are indistinguishable. (b) J–V characteristics collected in the dark. Statistics on the (c) FF and (d) Voc as a function of the top contact used.
Average photovoltaic parameters with standard deviation σ extracted from J–V curves for solar cells with different top contact
| Top contact | FF (%) |
|
| PCE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCP | 77.8 ± 2.8 | 1.132 ± 3 | 20.5 ± 0.1 | 18.1 ± 0.2 |
| Liq | 77.6 ± 1.9 | 1.130 ± 4 | 20.4 ± 0.3 | 18.1 ± 0.3 |
| BCP/Ba | 67.1 ± 1.9 | 1.115 ± 2 | 20.7 ± 0.5 | 15.7 ± 0.1 |
| BCP/Liq | 78.3 ± 0.2 | 1.123 ± 6 | 20.6 ± 0.7 | 18.4 ± 0.2 |
| Ba | 71.8 ± 1.8 | 1.147 ± 7 | 20.7 ± 0.7 | 17.1 ± 0.6 |
Fig. 3Steady-state PL spectra of devices with different top contacts, excited with a 522 nm laser at the intensity equivalent to 1 sun illumination.
Fig. 4(a) Evolution of the PCE of devices with different top contacts under continuous simulated solar illumination. (b) Open-circuit voltage for the same devices measured as-fabricated (empty symbols) and maximum Voc recorded during maximum power point tracking (full symbols).