| Literature DB >> 35495984 |
Xin Yang1, Dexing Li1, Chenggang Song1, Peiyuan Shao1, Shiming Wang1, Ziqing Wang1, Yin Lv1,2, Zhong Wei1,2.
Abstract
Synthesizing hydroxy-functional linear copolymers with high molecular weights (M n) and low branching degree (Den%) remains challenging, although there has been much headway in the area of functional copolymers. Here, we studied the effect of polymerization methods (one-step or two-step) and solvents (organic solvent: diphenyl ether or ionic liquids: [C n mim]TF2N/BF4/PF6, n = 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10) on M n and Den% of copolymers P(OA-GA) (1,8-octanediol adipate (O-A)/glycerol adipate (G-A)). The M n of P(OA-GA) reached up to 53 937 g mol-1 in two-step in diphenyl ether, and the Den% of glycerol can be controlled within 30%. The physical properties of these copolymers were investigated by contact angles, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and in vitro biodegradation. With increasing glycerol content in the polyesters, both hydrophilic properties and degradation properties increased. This system not only facilitates the synthesis of functional polyesters with high molecular weight and low branching, but also expands the possibility of using bio-based monomers to synthesize functional polymers. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35495984 PMCID: PMC9049703 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra00120a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Scheme 1Procedure for two step polycondensation.
Fig. 113C-NMR spectrum of P(OA–GA), showing the signals corresponding to different methine groups of the synthesized P(OA–GA) polymers.
The proportion of glycerol repeat unit substitution of copolymer P(OA–GA)a
| Entry | Molar ratio A : O : G | Pre-polymerization temperature | Solvent | Time (h) | Ter |
|
| Den |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | 1 : 0.8 : 0.2 | — | Diphenyl ether | 12 | 11.76 | 14.12 | 58.82 | 15.29 |
| M2 | 1 : 0.8 : 0.2 | 100–130 | Diphenyl ether | 24 | 18.66 | 10.07 | 39.93 | 31.34 |
| M3 | 1 : 0.8 : 0.2 | 110–140 | Diphenyl ether | 24 | 14.98 | 10.58 | 39.96 | 34.49 |
| M4 | 1 : 0.8 : 0.2 | 130–160 | Diphenyl ether | 24 | 12.80 | 12.40 | 40.00 | 34.80 |
| M5 | 1 : 0.84 : 0.21 | 130–160 | Diphenyl ether | 24 | 12.89 | 15.11 | 44.44 | 27.56 |
| M6 | 1 : 0.8 : 0.2 | — | [C6mim]Tf2N | 24 | 13.74 | 17.53 | 47.39 | 21.33 |
| M7 | 1 : 0.8 : 0.2 | 130–160 | [C6mim]Tf2N | 24 | 13.78 | 15.11 | 44.44 | 26.67 |
| M8 | 1 : 0.84 : 0.21 | 130–160 | [C6mim]Tf2N | 24 | 20.42 | 19.58 | 40.83 | 19.20 |
| M9 | 1 : 0.88 : 0.22 | 130–160 | [C6mim]Tf2N | 24 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
The products were synthesized through two-step method (entries M2–M5, M7–M9) or directly synthesized from monomers (M1 and M6); all post-polymerization were conducted at 60 °C, N-435 (10 wt% of monomers), in vacuum 1.5–3 mmHg.
A = adipic acid; O = 1,8-octanediol; G = glycerol.
Pre-polymerization were conducted under N2 atmosphere. Data were analysed by 13C NMR and calculated based on.
Eqn (2).
Eqn (3).
Eqn (4).
Eqn (5).
Molecular weight and polydispersity of P(OA–GA) from model reactiona
| Entry | Molar ratio A : O : G | Pre-polymerization temperature | Solvent | Time (h) |
| PDI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | 1 : 0.8 : 0.2 | — | Diphenyl ether | 12 | 33 921 | 1.49 |
| M2 | 1 : 0.8 : 0.2 | 100–130 | Diphenyl ether | 24 | 17 623 | 3.34 |
| M3 | 1 : 0.8 : 0.2 | 110–140 | Diphenyl ether | 24 | 38 516 | 1.28 |
| M4 | 1 : 0.8 : 0.2 | 130–160 | Diphenyl ether | 24 | 39 687 | 1.36 |
| M5 | 1 : 0.84 : 0.21 | 130–160 | Diphenyl ether | 24 | 53 937 | 1.79 |
| M6 | 1 : 0.8 : 0.2 | — | [C6mim]Tf2N | 24 | 4905 | 1.28 |
| M7 | 1 : 0.8 : 0.2 | 130–160 | [C6mim]Tf2N | 24 | 11 322 | 1.71 |
| M8 | 1 : 0.84 : 0.21 | 130–160 | [C6mim]Tf2N | 24 | 13 913 | 1.73 |
| M9 | 1 : 0.88 : 0.22 | 130–160 | [C6mim]Tf2N | 24 | 8039 | 1.55 |
The products were synthesized through two-step method (entries M2–M5, M7–M9) or directly synthesized from monomers (M1 and M6); all post-polymerization were conducted at 60 °C, N-435 (10 wt% of monomers), in vacuum 1.5–3 mmHg.
A = adipic acid; O = 1,8-octanediol; G = glycerol.
Pre-polymerization were conducted at 130, 140, 150 °C for 1 h and 160 °C for 2 h under N2 atmosphere.
Determined by GPC measurement in THF.
Fig. 2P(OA–GA), synthesized by N-435 catalysis: (A) effect of solvent and polycondensation method on Mn and PDI (Mw/Mn); (B) effect of solvent and pre-condensation temperature and molar ratio on Mn and PDI (Mw/Mn).
Polycondensations of P(OA–GA) in different conditionsa
| Entry | Tem. (°C) | Time (h) | Catalyst (wt%) | Ter |
|
| Den |
| PDI | Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | 60 | 24 | 0 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| C2 | 60 | 24 | 1 | 28.36 | 16.83 | 48.08 | 6.07 | 7087 | 1.34 | 54 |
| C3 | 60 | 24 | 5 | 25.46 | 17.13 | 46.76 | 10.65 | 9015 | 1.48 | 77 |
| C4 | 60 | 24 | 10 | 18.30 | 21.90 | 42.86 | 16.94 | 13 913 | 1.73 | 56 |
| C5 | 50 | 24 | 10 | 20.82 | 19.18 | 43.83 | 16.17 | 10 298 | 2.03 | 57 |
| C6 | 80 | 24 | 10 | 15.81 | 20.94 | 42.74 | 20.51 | 13 303 | 2.32 | 43 |
| C7 | 60 | 48 | 10 | 19.97 | 17.49 | 42.84 | 19.70 | 16 240 | 1.85 | 66 |
| C8 | 60 | 72 | 10 | 20.59 | 17.23 | 42.01 | 20.17 | 16 282 | 2.30 | 73 |
All products were synthesized by two-step method. Pre-condensation conditions: adipic acid : 1,8-octanediol : glycerol = 1 : 0.84 : 0.21; 130, 140, 150 °C for 1 h and 160 °C for 2 h. Post-polycondensations of all entries were in vacuum 1.5–3 mmHg, N-435 catalysed. Data were analysed by 13C NMR and calculated based on.
Eqn (2).
Eqn (3).
Eqn (4).
Eqn (5).
Determined by GPC measurement in THF n.d. = not determined.
Fig. 3P(OA–GA), synthesized by N-435 catalysis: plots of Mn and PDI (Mw/Mn) as a function of catalyst amount (A); post-condensation temperature (B); post-condensation time (C).
Polycondensations of P(OA–GA) in different ionic liquidsa
| Entry | Molar ratio A : O : G | Ionic liquid | Vis. | Ter |
|
| Den |
| PDI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | 1 : 0.84 : 0.21 | [C2mim]TF2N | 33 | 21.28 | 19.15 | 42.55 | 17.02 | 13 885 | 2.35 |
| L2 | 1 : 0.84 : 0.21 | [C4mim]TF2N | 52 | 20.23 | 19.84 | 41.25 | 18.68 | 17 509 | 1.56 |
| L3 | 1 : 0.84 : 0.21 | [C6mim]TF2N | 87.3 | 18.30 | 21.90 | 42.86 | 16.94 | 13 913 | 1.73 |
| L4 | 1 : 0.84 : 0.21 | [C10mim]TF2N | 142 | 21.04 | 20.25 | 42.67 | 16.04 | 13 725 | 2.02 |
| L5 | 1 : 0.84 : 0.21 | [C4mim]PF6 | 204 | 21.25 | 18.33 | 41.67 | 18.75 | 3280 | 1.04 |
| L6 | 1 : 0.84 : 0.21 | [C6mim]PF6 | 585 | 19.05 | 19.44 | 42.86 | 18.65 | 11 461 | 2.30 |
| L7 | 1 : 0.84 : 0.21 | [C8mim]PF6 | 682 | 26.85 | 18.52 | 46.30 | 8.33 | 5640 | 1.32 |
| L8 | 1 : 0.84 : 0.21 | [C2mim]BF4 | 38 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 10 945 | 2.06 |
| L9 | 1 : 0.84 : 0.21 | [C6mim]BF4 | 220 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 12 310 | 1.69 |
| L10 | 1 : 0.84 : 0.21 | [C10mim]BF4 | 930 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 11 223 | 2.15 |
| L11 | 1 : 0.53 : 0.53 | [C6mim]TF2N | 87.3 | 17.21 | 17.49 | 39.86 | 25.44 | 10 795 | 1.32 |
| L12 | 1 : 0.53 : 0.53 | [C4mim]PF6 | 204 | 16.87 | 19.28 | 40.16 | 23.69 | 10 605 | 1.24 |
| L13 | 1 : 0.53 : 0.53 | [C6mim]PF6 | 585 | 14.8 | 18.4 | 40.00 | 26.80 | 15 158 | 1.37 |
| L14 | 1 : 0.53 : 0.53 | [C2mim]BF4 | 38 | 15.98 | 18.26 | 45.66 | 20.09 | 12 599 | 1.73 |
| L15 | 1 : 0.53 : 0.53 | [C6mim]BF4 | 220 | 31.02 | 16.67 | 46.30 | 6.02 | 5371 | 1.27 |
| L16 | 1 : 0.53 : 0.53 | [C10mim]BF4 | 930 | 33.93 | 16.07 | 44.64 | 5.36 | 4349 | 1.15 |
All products were synthesized through two-step method. Pre-condensation conditions: 130, 140, 150 °C for 1 h and 160 °C for 2 h. Post-polycondensations conditions: 60 °C, N-435 (10 wt% of monomers), 24 h, in vacuum 1.5–3 mmHg.
A = adipic acid; O = 1,8-octanediol; G = glycerol.
Viscosity (mPa s, 25 °C) were provide by Shanghai Chengjie Chemical Co., Ltd. Data were analyzed by 13C NMR and calculated based on.
Eqn (2).
Eqn (3).
Eqn (4).
Eqn (5).
Determined by GPC measurement in THF n.d. = not determined.
Fig. 4Contact angle of P(OA-GA) synthesized in different feed ratio.
Fig. 5DSC curves (first scan) of P(OA–GA) (content in material ratio on curves).
Fig. 6P(OA–GA) co-polyester weight loss as a function of soaking time.