| Literature DB >> 35495685 |
Xingqi Zhao1,2, Wenli Tang3, Haoyang Wan1,2, Zixin Lan4, Hanjun Qin1,2, Qingrong Lin1,2, Yanjun Hu1,2, Guangchuang Yu3, Nan Jiang1,2, Bin Yu1,2.
Abstract
Preoperative diagnosis of fracture-related infection (FRI) is difficult for patients without obvious signs of infection. However, specific profiles of gut microbiota may be used as a potential diagnostic tool for FRI as suggested by a previous study. The fecal microbiome was compared between 20 FRI patients (FRI group), 18 fracture healed patients (FH group), and 12 healthy controls (HC group) included after collection of fecal samples and evaluation. The α and β diversity indices were used to characterize the fecal microbiome. Dysbiosis indexes were constructed based on the characteristic high-dimensional biomarkers identified in the fecal microbiota from the three groups by linear discriminant analysis and generalized linear model analysis to quantify the dysbiosis of fecal microbiota. The effectiveness of α and β diversity indices and dysbiosis indexes was assessed in distinguishing the fecal microbiome among the three groups. The influences of serum inflammatory factors on gut microbiota were also addressed. The α diversity indices were significantly different between the three groups, the highest in HC group and the lowest in FRI group (P < 0.05). The β diversity indices showed significant phylogenetic dissimilarity of gut microbiome composition among the three groups (P < 0.001). The dysbiosis indexes were significantly higher in FRI group than in FH and HC groups (P < 0.001). The area under Receiver operating characteristic curve showed the characteristics of gut microbiota and the gut microbiota was found as effective in distinguishing the three groups. The dysbiosis in the FRI patients was associated with systemic inflammatory factors. In addition, significant differences in the gut microbiota were not observed between the FRI patients versus without sinus tract or pus before operation. Since FRI patients, with or without sinus tract or pus, have a characteristic profile of gut microbiota, their gut microbiota may be used as an auxiliary diagnostic tool for suspected FRI.Entities:
Keywords: diagnosis; dysbiosis index; fracture-related infection (FRI); gut micobiota; short chain fatty acid
Year: 2022 PMID: 35495685 PMCID: PMC9048737 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.723791
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Clinical characteristics of the included participants.
| HC ( | FH ( | FRI ( | ||
|
| ||||
| Gender, M/F | 7/5 | 14/4 | 16/4 | 0.361 |
| Mean age, years (range) | 37.83 (23–62) | 40.78 (11–68) | 46.05 (13–73) | 0.313 |
|
| ||||
| Tibia | 5 (27.78%) | 12 (60.00%) | ||
| Tibia and fibula | 1 (5.56%) | 3 (15.00%) | ||
| Patella | 1 (5.56%) | 0 | ||
| Femur | 2 (11.11%) | 1 (5.00%) | ||
| Humerus | 3 (16.67%) | 0 | ||
| Radius and/or ulna | 3 (16.67%) | 0 | ||
| Clavicle | 1 (5.56%) | 0 | ||
| Foot and ankle | 1 (5.56%) | 3 (15.00%) | ||
| Knee joint | 0 | 1 (5.00%) | ||
| Elbow joint | 1 (5.56%) | 0 | ||
|
| ||||
| Sinus tract or fistula | 0 | 3 | ||
| Visible pus | 0 | 13 | ||
HC, healthy controls; FH, fracture healed; FRI, fracture-related infection; M/F, male/female.
FIGURE 1The gut microbiota composition in fracture-related infection (FRI), fracture healed (FH), and healthy controls (HC) groups. (A) Taxonomy composition at the phylum level. (B) Taxonomy composition at the genus level. (C) α Diversity indicted by Shannon’s diversity index. (D) α Diversity indicated by PD whole tree index. (E) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Unweighted UniFrac distance. (F) Comparisons of β diversity indicated by Unweighted UniFrac distance between samples in HC group and each group. “Others” represents lower-abundance taxa. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.
FIGURE 2Bacterial differential abundance in FRI, FH, and HC groups. (A) LDA score of Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) (FRI vs. FH vs. HC). (B) Bacteria genera for dysbiosis index building. (C) Dysbiosis Index (FRI vs. FH vs. HC). (D) Area under the curve (AUC) showing diagnostic accuracy of gut microbiota composition for FRI vs. HC. (E) AUC showing diagnostic accuracy of gut microbiota composition for FRI vs. FH.
FIGURE 3Fecal microbiota composition in relation to visible pus or sinus tract in FRI group. (A) α Diversity indicated by Shannon’s diversity index. (B) α Diversity indicated by PD whole tree index. (C) PCoA based on Unweighted UniFrac distance. (D) PCoA based on weighted UniFrac distance. (E) The Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio. (F) Bacteria genera for dysbiosis index building. (G) The dysbiosis index (HC vs. FH vs. Yes vs. No). (H) AUC showing diagnostic accuracy in judgment of sinus tract or pus before operation in FRI group based on gut microbiota composition (Yes vs. No). “Yes” for FRI subgroup with sinus tract or pus before operation and “No” for FRI subgroup without sinus tract or pus before operation.
FIGURE 4Fecal microbiota composition in relation to serum inflammatory markers. (A–D) Levels of serum inflammatory markers in FRI and FH groups. (E) Odds ratio (OR) values of serum inflammatory markers in FRI group compared to FH group. (F) Bubble chart showing significantly correlations between bacterial amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) and serum inflammatory markers. NEU, percentage of neutrophils; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein; SAA, serum amyloid A; WBC, white blood cell count; IL-6, interleukin-6; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; UA, uric acid; VD, vitamin D; Glu, glucose; PCT: procalcitonin. *P < 0.05, and **P < 0.01.
FIGURE 5Diagram of proposed mechanisms for gut microbiota changes induced by FRI.