| Literature DB >> 35495578 |
Taira Fukuda1, Toshiaki Nakajima2, Hiroko Yazawa2, Suguru Hirose2, Jun Yokomachi2, Takashi Kato3, Riichi Nishikawa2, Nobuo Koshiji2, Michiaki Tokura2, Takahisa Nasuno2, Setsu Nishino2, Syotaro Obi2, Ikuko Shibasaki3, Tomoaki Kanaya2, Fumitaka Nakamura4, Hirotsugu Fukuda3, Shichiro Abe2, Masashi Sakuma2, Shigeru Toyoda2.
Abstract
Purpose: Sarcopenia is closely associated with postoperative prognosis in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15 is involved in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. We examined the relationship between the serum GDF-15 concentration and muscle function in patients receiving aortic valve replacement and healthy elderly subjects.Entities:
Keywords: ANOVA, analysis of variance; AS, aortic stenosis; AWGS, Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia; Aortic valve replacement; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; CFS, Clinical Frailty Scale; CHF, chronic heart failure; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; GDF, growth differentiation factor; GH, growth hormone; Growth differentiation factor −15; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NYHA, New York Heart Association; PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension; ROC, receiver-operating characteristics; SAVR, conventional surgical aortic valve replacement; SMI, skeletal muscle mass index; Sarcopenia; TAK1, TGFβ-activated kinase 1; TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement; TGF, transforming growth factor; VO2, oxygen uptake; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; hsCRP, high-sensitive C-reactive protein
Year: 2022 PMID: 35495578 PMCID: PMC9043358 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc ISSN: 2352-9067
Patient Characteristics.
| Patients, Number | TAVR, 19 | SAVR, 24 |
|---|---|---|
| Risk factors, number | ||
| Hypertension (HT), n (%) | 7 (37) | 20 (83) |
| Diabetes (DM), n (%) | 1 (5) | 5 (21) |
| Dyslipidemia (Dlp), n (%) | 4 (21) | 12 (50) |
| Smoking, n (%) | 0 (0) | 4 (17) |
| CKD, n (%) | 6 (32) | 7 (29) |
| Hemodialysis (HD), n (%) | 0 (0) | 4 (17) |
| Previous cardiac surgery, n (%) | 1 (5) | 0 (0) |
| NYHA classification | 2.3 ± 0.7 | 2.0 ± 0.7 |
| Drugs, number | ||
| β-blockers, n (%) | 3 (16) | 6 (25) |
| Ca-blockers, n (%) | 1 (5) | 7 (29) |
| ACE-I/ARB, n (%) | 3 (16) | 9 (38) |
| Diuretics, n (%) | 3 (16) | 5 (21) |
| Statins, n (%) | 3 (16) | 6 (25) |
| Oral antidiabetic drugs, n (%) | 1 (5) | 4 (17) |
| Preoperative data | ||
| Hb, g/dL | 10.6 ± 1.4 | 11.8 ± 1.6 |
| Alb, g/dL | 3.7 ± 0.6 | 4.0 ± 0.6 |
| HbA1c, % | 5.8 ± 0.5 | 5.8 ± 0.6 |
| BNP, pg/mL | 438 ± 589 | 304 ± 349 |
| LVEF, % | 58.2 ± 10.9 | 61.9 ± 11.7 |
The values shown are mean ± SD. TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement; SAVR, conventional surgical aortic valve replacement; CKD, chronic kidney disease; NYHA, New York Heart Association; ACE-I, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin receptor blockers; Hb, hemoglobin; Alb, albumin; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.
Comparison of various parameters between female patients receiving aortic valve replacement and healthy elderly female subjects.
| Patients receiving aortic valve replacement | Healthy elderly subjects | p value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAVR (n = 19) | SAVR (n = 24) | |||
| Age, years | 84.8 ± 3.6***, ‡‡‡ | 76.0 ± 5.3 | 75.9 ± 6.1 | <0.001 |
| Grip strength, kgf | 16.0 ± 3.9*** | 16.5 ± 5.5*** | 22.6 ± 4.3 | <0.001 |
| Walking speed, m/s | 0.69 ± 0.25*** | 0.82 ± 0.33*** | 1.42 ± 0.32 | <0.001 |
| SMI, kg/m2 | 5.14 ± 0.51*** | 5.42 ± 0.65** | 6.04 ± 0.61 | <0.001 |
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 59.9 ± 16.8 | 58.7 ± 28.6 | 67.4 ± 13.4 | 0.193 |
| hsCRP, mg/L | 0.10 ± 0.13 | 0.46 ± 0.84 | 0.11 ± 0.26 | 0.042 |
| GDF-15, pg/mL | 1593 ± 803** | 1649 ± 1436 | 955 ± 368 | 0.001 |
Data show mean ± standard deviation. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. healthy elderly subjects, ‡‡‡ p < 0.001 vs. SAVR. TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement; SAVR, conventional surgical aortic valve replacement; SMI, skeletal muscle mass index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; hsCRP, high-sensitive C reactive protein; GDF, growth differentiation factor.
Correlations between serum GDF-15 concentration and various parameters in female patients receiving aortic valve replacement (TAVR, SAVR) and healthy elderly female subjects.
| Patients receiving aortic valve replacement (n = 43) | Healthy elderly subjects | |
|---|---|---|
| GDF-15 | GDF-15 | |
| Age | 0.357 (0.019)* | 0.541 (<0.001)*** |
| Grip strength | −0.614 (<0.001)*** | −0.186 (0.142) |
| Walking speed | −0.624 (0.001)** | −0.396 (0.001)** |
| SMI | −0.561 (0.003)** | −0.158 (0.212) |
| eGFR | −0.753 (<0.001)*** | −0.518 (<0.001)*** |
| hsCRP | 0.115 (0.478) | 0.123 (0.331) |
| BNP | 0.280 (0.094) | – |
| LVEF | −0.532 (0.002)** | – |
Data show r value (p value). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. GDF, growth differentiation factor; SMI, skeletal muscle mass index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; hsCRP, high-sensitive C reactive protein; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.
Fig. 1Correlations between the preoperative GDF-15 level and clinical data in female patients receiving aortic valve replacement. Correlations between the preoperative GDF-15 level and walking speed (a), grip strength (b), SMI (c), and eGFR (d).
Fig. 2Correlations between the preoperative GDF-15 level and clinical data in healthy elderly female subjects. Correlations between the preoperative GDF-15 level and walking speed (a), grip strength (b), SMI (c), and eGFR (d).
Multivariate analysis to determine walking speed, grip strength and SMI in all subjects (female patients receiving aortic valve replacement and healthy elderly female subjects).
| A: Multivariate linear regression analysis of walking speed and clinical data | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable: walking speed | ||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |
| Independent variable | β value (p) | β value (p) |
| GDF-15 (log) | −0.483*** (<0.001) | −0.212 (0.107) |
| hsCRP (log) | −0.038 (0.676) | −0.062 (0.468) |
| eGFR | 0.139 (0.204) | 0.178 (0.087) |
| B: Multivariate linear regression analysis of grip strength and clinical data | ||
| Dependent variable: grip strength | ||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |
| Independent variable | β value (p) | β value (p) |
| GDF-15 (log) | −0.539*** (<0.001) | −0.318* (0.025) |
| hsCRP (log) | −0.161 (0.089) | −0.186* (0.044) |
| eGFR | −0.154 (0.177) | −0.120 (0.281) |
| C: Multivariate linear regression analysis of SMI and clinical data | ||
| Dependent variable: SMI | ||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |
| Independent variable | β value (p) | β value (p) |
| GDF-15 (log) | −0.498*** (<0.001) | −0.240 (0.113) |
| hsCRP (log) | −0.013 (0.896) | −0.049 (0.618) |
| eGFR | −0.197 (0.118) | −0.147 (0.226) |
* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. Model 1, unadjusted; Model 2, adjusted by age. SMI, skeletal muscle mass index, GDF, growth differentiation factor; hsCRP, high-sensitive C reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Fig. 3An ROC curve to identify the optimal GDF-15 cutoff level for detecting sarcopenia in female patients receiving aortic valve replacement and healthy elderly female subjects. To generate the ROC curve, different GDF-15 levels were used to predict sarcopenia with true positives (sensitivity) on the vertical axis and false positives (1 – specificity) on the horizontal axis.