| Literature DB >> 35495273 |
Jia Liu1,2,3, Fang Tan4, Xinhong Liu1,2,3,5, Ruokun Yi1,2,3, Xin Zhao1,2,3.
Abstract
Studies on the antioxidant effects of grapes have attracted increasing interest. We used Lactobacillus fermentum CQPC04 to ferment grape skins. Components of the fermentation solution were separated and identified via high-performance liquid chromatography, and polyphenol compounds, including resveratrol and epicatechin, were isolated and identified from the fermentation solution. The major fermentation production components were assessed for their antioxidative abilities when administered under H2O2-induced oxidative damage in cell culture models. The fermentation solution significantly reduced oxidative damage, increased the expressions of the superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione (GSH), and GSH-peroxidase (GSH-Px) antioxidant genes and proteins in human embryonic kidney (293T) cells, stimulated the indices of total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), SOD, CAT, GSH, and GSH-Px, and inhibited the indices of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), malondialdehyde (MDA), and nitric oxide (NO), and the fermentation solution alleviated the increase in glutathione oxidized (GSSG) caused by oxidative damage, and the ratio of GSH/GSSG was up-regulated compared to the damage group. The fermentation solution also accelerated Human hepatoma (HepG2) cell death. Applying the fermentation solution to HepG2 cells significantly altered the cell morphology. HepG2 cell apoptosis and cell cycles were detected via flow cytometry. The fermentation solution promoted the apoptotic rate, and more cells were retained in the G2 phase, which prevented cells from further dividing. In the fermented group, the mRNA expression levels of Bcl-2, cox-2, PCNA, CD1, C-myc, CDK4, NF-κB and pRb1 were significantly decreased, and the expression levels of Caspase-3, Caspase-7, Caspase-8, Caspase-9, p53, TGF-β, and p21 were higher than those in the normal group. Phospho-NF-κB (p65), Bax and Caspase-8 protein expression increased, and NF-κB (p65) protein expression decreased. Protein expression levels also promoted apoptosis. Fermented grape skin solution is bioavailable in vitro and may help prevent oxidation and cancer cell proliferation. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35495273 PMCID: PMC9049054 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra09863a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
qPCR primer sequences
| Gene | Primer sequence |
|
|---|---|---|
|
| F: 5′-TCAAGAAGGTGGTGAAGCAGG-3′ | |
| R: 5′-AGCGTCAAAGGTGGAGGAGTG-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-TGGAGCTGGTAACCCAGTAGG-3′ | 57.0 |
| R: 5′-CCTTTGCCTTGGAGTATTTGGTA-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-GGTGGGCCAAAGGATGAAGAG-3′ | 57.0 |
| R: 5′-CCACAAGCCAAACGACTTCC-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-GGGAGCCTCTTGCAGGATAAA-3′ | 57.0 |
| R: 5′-GAATGGGGCATAGCTCACCAC-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-CAGTCGGTGTATGCCTTCTCG-3′ | 57.0 |
| R: 5′-GAGGGACGCCACATTCTCG-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-CTTTGAGGTGCGTGTTTGTGC-3′ | 51.6 |
| R: 5′-GGTTTCTTCTTTGGCTGGGGA-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-ATGGCTACCTCTCGATATGAGC-3′ | 56.6 |
| R: 5′-CATTGGGGACTCTCACACTCT-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-GCTGCGAAGTGGAAACCATC-3′ | 60.3 |
| R: 5′-CCTCCTTCTGCACACATTTGAA-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-TGTCCGTCAGAACCCATGC-3′ | 54.9 |
| R: 5′-AAAGTCGAAGTTCCATCGCTC-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-CTCTCGTCAGGCTTGAGTTTG-3′ | 66.0 |
| R: 5′GACATCTCATCTAGGTCAACTGC-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-TGGAACGTCAGAGGAGAAACGA-3′ | 50.0 |
| R: 5′-CTTGAACGGACAGGATGTAGGC-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-CATGGAAGCGAATCAATGGACT-3′ | 50.7 |
| R: 5′-CTGTACCAGACCGAGATGTCA-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-ATTTTGAGATCAAGCCCCACG-3′ | 66.0 |
| R: 5′-GGATACAGCAGATGAAGCAGTCC-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-CTCAGACCAGAGATTCGCAAAC-3′ | 50.0 |
| R: 5′-GCATTTCCCCTCAAACTCTCAA-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-CGGTCCTCGTTTGTACCGTC-3′ | 64.4 |
| R: 5′-CGCCCATACCTGTCACTTTATCA-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-CTGGCGCTCAGCCATACAG-3′ | 65.0 |
| R: 5′-CGCACTTATACTGGTCAAATCCC-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-ATGTGTGTGGAGAGCGTCAACC-3′ | 65.0 |
| R: 5′-CAGAGACAGCCAGGAGAAATCAA-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-GAAGCACGAATGACAGAGGC-3′ | 50.9 |
| R: 5′-GCTTGGCGGATTAGCTCTTTT-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-CCAGGGCTCCATCCTCAAGAA-3′ | 62.0 |
| R: 5′-GACGTGGGACGAGTCCATGCT-3′ | ||
|
| F: 5′-CAGCGTGCCTAAACTTTATCAGC-3′ | 58.2 |
| R: 5′-TCAGGAGGATGTTTCACATGGA-3′ |
Fig. 1In vitro antioxidant capacity of each experimental group. (A) Resistance of each experimental group to DPPH at different time intervals (24, 48, 72, 96, 120 hours). (B) Resistance of each experimental group to ABTS at different time intervals (24, 48, 72, 96, 120 hours). Values presented are the means ± standard deviation (N = 3/group) (CF: the fermentation solution fermented by LF-CQPC04; BF: the fermentation solution fermented by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus; and WE: the solution extracted by ethanol) (* stands P < 0.05, ** stands 0.05 < P < 0.01, **** stands 0.01 < P < 0.001, **** stands 0.001 < P < 0.0001).
Fig. 2The trend of cell viability rate with time and concentration of H2O2.
Fig. 3Effect of grape skin fermentation solution on cell growth. (A) Effect of treatment with grape skin fermentation solution for 48 hours on 293T cell growth and viability. (B) Effect of treatment with grape skin fermentation solution for 48 hours on HepG2 cell growth and viability (CF: the fermentation solution fermented by LF-CQPC04; BF: the fermentation solution fermented by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus; and WE: the solution extracted by ethanol).
Fig. 4Effect of treatment grape skin fermentation solution for 48 hours on 293T cell morphology (200×) (CF: the fermentation solution fermented by LF-CQPC04; BF: the fermentation solution fermented by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus; and WE: the solution extracted by ethanol).
Fig. 5Effect of treatment with grape skin fermentation solution for 48 hours on HepG2 cell morphology (200×) (CF: the fermentation solution fermented by LF-CQPC04; BF: the fermentation solution fermented by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus; and WE: the solution extracted by ethanol).
LDH, GSH-Px, CAT, MDA, SOD, T-AOC and NO content in 293T cellsa
| Group | LDH (U/104) | GSH-Px (U per mg prot.) | CAT (U/104) | MDA (nmol/104) | SOD (U/104) | T-AOC (U/104) | NO (μmol/104) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 5.44 ± 0.16a | 2.50 ± 0.20d | 2.77 ± 0.21b | 1.42 ± 0.04a | 18.12 ± 0.61c | 18.32 ± 0.79c | 4.20 ± 0.39a |
| Control | 8.90 ± 0.33c | 0.91 ± 0.11a | 1.43 ± 0.10a | 2.72 ± 0.17c | 10.46 ± 0.57a | 11.42 ± 0.16a | 8.43 ± 0.49b |
| CF | 6.06 ± 0.28a | 1.98 ± 0.06c | 2.48 ± 0.22c | 1.65 ± 0.07b | 16.61 ± 0.68b | 14.94 ± 0.97b | 4.92 ± 0.41a |
| BF | 7.40 ± 0.45b | 1.62 ± 0.08b | 1.95 ± 0.11b | 1.75 ± 0.09b | 16.63 ± 0.32b | 14.62 ± 1.22b | 4.38 ± 0.66a |
| WE | 7.41 ± 0.40b | 1.72 ± 0.03b | 1.88 ± 0.05b | 1.79 ± 0.08b | 15.73 ± 0.47b | 13.40 ± 0.31b | 5.29 ± 0.25a |
a–cMean values with different letters in the same column differ significantly (P < 0.05) by Duncan's multiple range test. Values presented are the means ± standard deviation (N = 3/group) (CF: the fermentation solution fermented by LF-CQPC04; BF: the fermentation solution fermented by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus; and WE: the solution extracted by ethanol).
GSH, GSSG and GSH/GSSG content in 293T cellsa
| Group | GSH (μg/104) | GSSG | GSH/GSSG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 3.13 ± 0.14c | 0.47 ± 0.13b | 6.69 ± 0.83b |
| Control | 1.89 ± 0.07a | 0.40 ± 0.22a | 4.97 ± 1.33a |
| CF | 2.86 ± 0.12bc | 0.44 ± 0.14b | 6.60 ± 0.92a |
| BF | 2.76 ± 0.27bc | 0.44 ± 0.17b | 6.25 ± 0.87a |
| WE | 2.67 ± 0.24b | 0.42 ± 0.09a | 6.33 ± 0.39a |
a–cMean values with different letters in the same column differ significantly (P < 0.05) by Duncan's multiple range test. Values presented are the means ± standard deviation (N = 3/group) (CF: the fermentation solution fermented by LF-CQPC04; BF: the fermentation solution fermented by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus; and WE: the solution extracted by ethanol).
Fig. 6SOD, GSH, CAT, and GSH-Px mRNA expressions in 293T cells. a–eMean values with different letters in the same column differed significantly (P < 0.05) by Duncan's multiple range test. Values presented are the means ± standard deviation (N = 3/group) (CF: the fermentation solution fermented by LF-CQPC04; BF: the fermentation solution fermented by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus; and WE: the solution extracted by ethanol).
Fig. 7SOD, GSH, CAT, and GSH-Px protein expression in 293T cells. Values presented are the means ± standard deviation (N = 3/group) (CF: the fermentation solution fermented by LF-CQPC04; BF: the fermentation solution fermented by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus; and WE: the solution extracted by ethanol) (* stands P < 0.05, ** stands 0.05 < P < 0.01, **** stands 0.01 < P < 0.001, **** stands 0.001 < P < 0.0001).
Fig. 8Effect of grape skin fermentation solution on the HepG2 cell cycle and apoptosis and cell cycle (CF: the fermentation solution fermented by LF-CQPC04; BF: the fermentation solution fermented by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus; and WE: the solution extracted by ethanol).
Fig. 9The mRNA expressions in HepG2. a–dMean values with different letters in the same column differ significantly (P < 0.05) by Duncan's multiple range test. Values presented are the means ± standard deviation (N = 3/group) (CF: the fermentation solution fermented by LF-CQPC04; BF: the fermentation solution fermented by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus; and WE: the solution extracted by ethanol).
Fig. 10Phospho-NF-κB (p65), Bax, Caspase-8, and NF-κB (p65) protein expressions in HepG2 cells. Values presented are the means ± standard deviation (N = 3/group) (CF: the fermentation solution fermented by LF-CQPC04; BF: the fermentation solution fermented by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus; and WE: the solution extracted by ethanol) (* stands P < 0.05, ** stands 0.05 < P < 0.01, **** stands 0.01 < P < 0.001, **** stands 0.001 < P < 0.0001).
Fig. 11Polyphenol constituents of the grape skin fermentation solution. (A) Standard chromatograms; 1: epicatechin gallate (ECG); 2: coumarin; 3: new chlorogenic acid; 4: rutin; 5: resveratrol; 6: chlorogenic acid. (B) CF chromatograms; (C) BF chromatograms; (D) WE chromatograms (CF: the fermentation solution fermented by LF-CQPC04; BF: the fermentation solution fermented by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus; and WE: the solution extracted by ethanol).