| Literature DB >> 35494476 |
Zhi-Xia Zhang1, Shuo Wang1, Shi-Ming Li1, Si-Li Shan1, Huan Wang1, Jia-Xing Lu1.
Abstract
To develop efficient catalysts for the electroreduction of organic halides, a facile one-pot synthesis of Ag nanoparticles/ordered mesoporous carbon electrode materials via the self-assembly of CH3COOAg and resol in the presence of triblock copolymer is proposed. The resultant electrode materials possess uniform mesopore sizes (3.3 nm) and pore volumes (∼0.28 cm3 g-1), high specific surface areas (∼500 m2 g-1), and uniformly dispersed Ag nanoparticles (12-36 nm) loaded within the carbon matrix. Cyclic voltammetry, measurements of electrochemically active surface area, and electrolysis experiments were conducted to understand the correlations between the catalytic ability and the structural and textural features of the catalysts. Excellent bibenzyl yield (98%) and remarkable reusability were obtained under mild conditions. The results confirm that the prepared nanocomposites show outstanding performance in the electroreduction degradation of PhCH2Br to bibenzyl. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35494476 PMCID: PMC9048727 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra08930f
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1(A) Small-angle and (B) wide-angle XRD patterns of the Ag nanoparticle/ordered mesoporous carbon samples containing different Ag contents.
Physical properties of the Ag nanoparticles/ordered mesoporous carbon samples
| Sample | Unit cell parameter |
|
|
| Metal amount | Metal amount | Ag-ECSA | Ag-ECSA/AgNP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMC | 14.8 | 534 | 0.28 | 2.4 | — | — | ||
| Ag/OMC-I | 17.6 | 519 | 0.28 | 3.3 | 7.3 | 6.7 | 2.1 | 31 |
| Ag/OMC-II | 16.4 | 499 | 0.27 | 3.3 | 10.6 | 9.7 | 15.5 | 159 |
| Ag/OMC-III | 13.6 | 483 | 0.27 | 3.3 | 12.7 | 12.0 | 30.0 | 250 |
| Ag/OMC-IV | 11.0 | 495 | 0.29 | 3.3 | 14.1 | 13.7 | 15.1 | 110 |
Calculated from XRD results.
Calculated using the BJH model from sorption data in a P/P0 range from 0.04 to 0.2.
Calculated using the BJH model from the adsorption branches of the isotherms.
The Ag weight percentage obtained via TGA by combusting the carbon components.
The Ag weight percentage obtained by ICP-AES.
Measured by lead underpotential deposition.
Ag-ECSA divided by the Ag content of Ag/OMC.
Fig. 2(A) N2 sorption/desorption isotherms and (B) the corresponding pore size distribution curves of Ag/OMC samples with different Ag contents.
Fig. 3Schematic illustration of the co-assembly route for the synthesis of Ag/OMC.
Fig. 4TEM images and grain diameter distributions (inset) of the Ag/OMC samples containing different Ag contents: (a) Ag/OMC-I, (b) Ag/OMC-II, (c) Ag/OMC-III, and (d) Ag/OMC-IV.
Fig. 5Cyclic voltammograms recorded at a scan rate of 0.1 V s−1 using different working electrodes in MeCN-0.1 M TEABF4-5mM PhCH2Br.
Effects of various synthetic factors on the yield of productsa
| Entry | Cathode | Potential (V) |
| Conversion | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ag | −0.70 | 1.0 | 30 | 24 |
| 2 | OMC | −1.30 | 1.0 | 12 | 8 |
| 3 | Ag/OMC-I | −0.75 | 1.0 | 40 | 32 |
| 4 | Ag/OMC-II | −0.70 | 1.0 | 52 | 45 |
| 5 | Ag/OMC-III | −0.65 | 1.0 | 82 | 76 |
| 6 | Ag/OMC-IV | −0.80 | 1.0 | 50 | 41 |
| 7 | Ag/OMC-III | −0.55 | 1.0 | 28 | 18 |
| 8 | Ag/OMC-III | −0.60 | 1.0 | 62 | 55 |
| 9 | Ag/OMC-III | −0.70 | 1.0 | 71 | 65 |
| 10 | Ag/OMC-III | −0.65 | 1.2 | 87 | 80 |
| 11 | Ag/OMC-III | −0.65 | 1.4 | 96 | 91 |
| 12 | Ag/OMC-III | −0.65 | 1.5 | >99 | 98 |
| 13 | Ag/OMC-III | −0.65 | 2.0 | >99 | 96 |
Anode: Mg, solvent: MeCN (20 mL), supporting electrolyte: TEABF4 (0.1 M), substrate: PhCH2Br (0.05 M), T = 298 ± 2 K, PN = 1 atm.
Some relatively large errors are due to the volatility of some of the species (toluene and benzyl bromide).
The yields were determined by gas chromatography and based on the reactant.
Fig. 6Reuse of the Ag/OMC-III cathode. Reaction conditions are given in Table 2, entry 12.