Literature DB >> 35494443

Cembrane-type diterpenoids from the gum resin of Boswellia carterii and their biological activities.

Xiaowei Sun1,2, Yanling Geng1, Xiao Wang1, Dawei Qin2, Jinqian Yu1.   

Abstract

Eight new cembrane-type diterpenoids, boscartins AH-AK (1-8), along with two known ones (9-10), were isolated from the gum resin of Boswellia carterii. Compounds 1-3 were characteristic of high oxidation assignable to three epoxy groups, while compounds 4-8 were characteristic of two epoxy groups. Spectroscopic examination was used to elucidate their structures. All isolates were evaluated for antiproliferative activity against HCT-116 human colon cancer cells, anti-inflammatory activity against nitric oxide (NO) production, and hepatoprotective activity in vitro. All of them showed weak antiproliferative activity (IC50 > 100 μM), 8 exhibited potent inhibitory effects on NO production (IC50 of 14.8 μM), with the others showing weak anti-inflammatory activity (IC50 > 30 μM), and 1 exhibited more potent hepatoprotective activity than the positive control, bicyclol, at 10 μM against the damage induced by paracetamol in HepG2 cells. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 35494443      PMCID: PMC9047511          DOI: 10.1039/c9ra09776g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RSC Adv        ISSN: 2046-2069            Impact factor:   4.036


Introduction

Boswellia carterii Birdw. belonging to the family of Burseraceae is greatly known for its ability to secrete a gum resin by the bark, which was known as olibanum. The gum resin of Boswellia carterii has been used in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for blood-activating and pain-relieving drugs to treat inflammatory diseases, blood stasis, traumatic injuries, and so on.[1] Previous studies have led to the identification of the active compounds from the gum resin of Boswellia carterii mainly as mono-, sesqui-, di- and tri-terpenoids, which have been discovered to show anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic, hepatoprotective, antibacterial, and antifungal activities.[2-10] Among these different kinds of metabolites, diterpenoids and triterpenoids have been identified as the main bioactive ones, which have been mainly classified into the cembrane-type and prenylaromandendrane-type diterpenoids and the oleanane-type and ursane-type triterpenoids. In particular, cembrane-type diterpenoids bearing a 14-membered oxygenated macrocycle have received more and more interest in the laboratory studies of structural modification and natural product research, however, which are mainly contained in soft corals.[11-15] Due to the difficulty of obtaining these soft corals, there has been an increasing research into the cembrane-type diterpenoids obtained from terrestrial plants. Nowadays, more and more pharmacological studies have been carried out to research the chemical diversity of cembrane-type diterpenoids reported from the gum resin of Boswellia carterii, the acquisition of which is in great demand from the viewpoints of structural and pharmacological properties.[2,3,16,17] As part of an ongoing research for cembrane-type diterpenoids with diverse structures and significant activities from the gum resin of Boswellia carterii, a phytochemical investigation of the petroleum ether extract was conducted on the basis of the cytotoxic activity against HCT 116 cell, anti-inflammatory activity against nitric oxide (NO) production, and hepatoprotective activity in vitro. During this study, eight new cembrane-type diterpenoids (1–8) and two known ones (9-10) (Fig. 1) were obtained from the gum resin of Boswellia carterii. What's interesting, all the obtained cembrane-type diterpenoids were characteristic of high oxidation assignable to multiple epoxy groups. Herein, the isolation and structural elucidation of the new compounds are discussed, as well as the antiproliferative activity against HCT-116 human colon cancer cell, anti-inflammatory activity against nitric oxide (NO) production, and protective effect on cytotoxicity induced by paracetamol in HepG2 cells of all the isolated compounds.
Fig. 1

The structures of 1–10 and key COSY (—) correlations observed for 1.

Results and discussion

The gum resin of B. carterii was extracted with 95% ethanol to offer a crude extract, which was further suspended in 20% aqueous ethanol and partitioned successively with petroleum ether (PE), CH2Cl2, and EtOAc. The partitioned PE part was eluted rapidly by silica gel chromatography with PE and CH2Cl2. The eluted PE part was subjected to multiple column chromatography (CC) to afford eight newly described cembrane-type diterpenes (1–8) and two known cembranes (9-10). The NMR spectra analysis of these isolated compounds also revealed the characteristic structure category of cembrane-type diterpenoids, with elucidated as preliminary common cembranoid featured by one fourteen-member ring incorporated with one isopropyl.[14,15] Compound 1 was presented as colorless oil, the molecular formula of which was determined as C22H34O5 based on its positive HRESIMS ion peak at m/z 379.2505 [M + H]+ (calcd for 379.2440) with six indices of hydrogen deficiency. The IR spectrum suggested the absorption bands for hydroxy (3476 cm−1) and ester carbonyl (1736 cm−1) groups. Its 1H NMR data (Table 1) displayed signals of one isopropyl at δH 0.91 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz, Me-16), 0.96 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz, Me-17), 2.17 (1H, m, H-15), three methyl singlets at δH 1.18 (3H, s, Me-20), 1.34 (3H, s, Me-18) and 1.51 (3H, s, Me-19), one olefinic proton at δH 5.43 (1H, dd, J = 6.0, 10.8 Hz, H-9) and four oxymethine protons at δH 4.75 (1H, d, J = 10.8 Hz, H-11) and 2.94 (1H, dt, J = 4.0, 8.8 Hz, H-6). Its further analysis of the 13C NMR and HSQC spectra showed signals of five methyls, five methylenes, six methines including one olefinic methine at δC 125.3 (C-9), four oxymethines at δC 59.2 (C-3), 53.6 (C-6), 56.1 (C-7), 80.9 (C-11), and four quaternary carbons including three oxygenated tertiary carbons at δC 89.0 (C-1), 57.7 (C-4), and 83.8 (C-12), and one quaternary olefinic carbon at δC 137.9 (C-8). Thus, the aforementioned evidence hinted at the presence of the diagnostic cembrane-type diterpenoid with one isopropyl, three methyl singlets, and one double bond in compound 1. What's more, one acetyl group was also revealed in compound 1 deduced by δH 2.08 (3H, s) and δC 170.8, 21.1, in conjuction with IR absorption at 1709 cm−1, assigned to C-11 based on the HMBC correlation of

1H (400 MHz) and 13C (100 MHz) NMR data for compounds 1–4 (δ in ppm, J in Hz)a

No.1234
δ H a δ C a δ H δ C δ H δ C δ H δ C
189.088.288.988.9
2a2.01 m36.41.84 d(15.2)35.11.95 d(15.2)36.41.83 dd(3.2, 15.2)35.3
2b1.64 overlapped1.60 dd(10.4, 15.2)1.60 overlapped1.58 dd(5.2, 15.2)
33.06 dd(2.4, 4.0)59.23.08 d(10.4)57.83.14 t(3.2)60.12.92 dd(3.2, 5.2)59.4
457.757.258.859.2
5a2.79 dd(4.0, 13.2)42.92.61 dd(2.4, 13.8)41.41.65 overlapped36.02.11 m37.2
5b0.78 dd(13.2, 10.4)1.08 dd(10.4, 13.8)1.42 m1.45 overlapped
6a2.94 dt(8.8, 4.0)53.62.73 d(10.4)60.11.81 m25.22.25 m(2H)23.4
6b1.67 m
73.56 s56.13.03 s57.83.03 dd(3.6, 6.4)58.85.59 t(6.8)128.8
8137.9143.259.9134.5
9a5.43 dd(6.0, 10.8)125.32.38 m32.31.61 overlapped30.64.10 d(10.8)87.2
9b2.20 m1.58 overlapped
10a2.86 td(0.8, 10.8)27.62.15 m26.51.72 m23.82.07 d(12.8)31.9
10b2.14 td(10.8, 6.0)1.90 m1.49 m1.82 dt(12.8, 10.8)
114.75 d(10.8)80.94.82 dd(1.6, 11.6)76.34.84 d(11.2)79.44.78 d(10.8)76.1
1283.884.184.183.0
13a1.96 overlapped35.71.97 overlapped31.51.93 overlapped35.61.88 overlapped35.4
13b1.64 overlapped1.58 overlapped1.65 overlapped1.65 overlapped
14a1.95 overlapped30.01.97 overlapped35.41.94 overlapped29.91.89 overlapped29.8
14b1.64 overlapped1.66 m1.43 m1.46 overlapped
152.17 m32.71.99 overlapped34.51.80 overlapped32.92.09 overlapped33.0
160.91 d(6.8)18.70.91 d(6.8)17.90.93 d(6.8)18.80.90 overlapped17.1
170.96 d(6.8)16.80.94 d(6.8)17.60.95 d(6.8)16.90.90 overlapped17.1
181.34 s17.91.34 s18.31.27 s19.21.23 s17.1
191.51 s17.64.92 s, 4.74 s110.81.27 s17.01.73 s14.5
201.18 s21.51.20 s22.41.10 s21.51.16 s21.5
2.08 s21.12.10 s21.12.09 s21.22.11 s21.3
170.8170.6171.2171.3
OH7.93 s (OH-9)

1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained in CDCl3.

1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained in CDCl3. The cembrane-type planar structure of 1 was unambiguously elucidated by the integrated evidence provided by the 2D NMR experiments. Five different substructural fragments a (C-2–C-3), b (C-5–C-6–C-7), c (C-9–C-10–C-11), d (C-13–C-14), e (C-15–C-16 and C-15–C-17) were readily identified by the correlations from the COSY spectrum, the connectivities of which were achieved by the HMBC correlations (Fig. 2). Pivotal correlations of H2-2, H-3, H-15, Me-16 and Me-17 to C-1; H2-2, H-3, H2-5, H-6, and Me-18 to C-4; H-6, H-7, H-9, H2-10, and Me-19 to C-8; H2-10, H-11, H2-14, and Me-20 to C-12, H-15 to C-1, C-2, C-12 and C-14 from the HMBC data, confirmed the cyclization of a 14-membered macrocycle but also the linkage of the isopropyl to this macrocycle. Additionally, 3 of 6 degrees of unsaturation were accounted for a double bond, an acetyl carbonyl, and a macrocycle, which allowed the remain three degrees of unsaturation for three additional epoxy rings of 1:12-epoxide, 3:4-epoxide, and 6:7-epoxide, in conjuction with the molecular formula and 13C NMR data. The 8, 9 double bond was located according to the HMBC correlations of H-9/C-7/C-8/C-10/C-11, Me-19/C-7/C-8/C-9, and H-7/C-5/C-8/C-9/Me-19. Thus, the planar structure of 1 was assigned as 1:12,3:4,6:7-triepoxy-11-acetoxy-8-cembranene, which represented the first cembrane-type diterpenoid with three epoxy bridges at 1:12, 3:4, and 6:7.
Fig. 2

Key HMBC () correlations observed for 1–8.

The configurations and structure of 1 were further established by analysis of its NOESY correlations and coupling constants. The NOE correlations of H-3/H-5b, H-7; H-6/H-7, Me-18, Me-19; H-7/H-3, H-5b; H-10a/Me-20, H-3, H-7, H-11; H-10b/H-9; and H-11/H-3, H-10a, Me-20, showed that H-3, H-6, H-7, H-10a, H-11, Me-18 and Me-20 were all in β, thus, rendering the 3,4-oxirane, 6,7-oxirane and the acetyl group at C-11 to be α orientations (Fig. 3). Additionally, the large coupling constant of JH-9,H-10a = 10.8 Hz, and the small coupling constant of JH-9,H-10b = 6.0 Hz, as well as the large coupling constant of JH-11,H-10b = 10.8 Hz, and the small coupling constant of JH-11,H-10a = 0.8 Hz, indicated not only a less than 90° torsional angle between the intersecting H(9)C(9)C(8) and H(10b)C(10)C(9) flats, but also a approximately 180° torsional angle between the intersecting H(10b)C(10)C(11) and H(11)C(11)C(10) flats (Fig. 3), ascertaining the α orientation of the acetyl group at C-11. Similarly, the large coupling constant of JH-5b,H-6 = 10.4 Hz, and the small coupling constant of JH-5a,H-6 = 4.0 Hz, as well as the large coupling constant of JH-5a,H-5b = 13.2 Hz, and the singlet of H-7, indicated not only a approximately 180° torsional angle between the intersecting H(6)C(6)C(5) and H(5b)C(5)C(6) flats, but also the α orientation of the 6,7-oxirane group (Fig. 3). In addition, the olefinic geometry of C-8/C-9 was ascertained as Z form by the NOE correlations of H-9/Me-19. Hence, the structure of 1 was defined as (1S,3R,4S,6R,7R,11R,12R,8Z)-1:12,3:4,6:7-triepoxy-11-acetoxy-8-cembrene (boscartins AH) with the aid of a computer-modeled 3D structure (Fig. 3) generated by MM2 force field calculations for energy minimization using the molecular modeling program Chem 3D Ultra 14.0.
Fig. 3

Key NOE () correlations observed for 1–8 (3D structures of 1–8 were generated by MM2 force field calculations for energy minimization using the molecular modeling program Chem 3D Ultra 14.0).

Compound 2 was presented as colorless oil with the molecular formula of C22H34O5 as determined to be the same with 1 by its positive HRESIMS experiment (m/z 379.2521 [M + H]+, calcd for 379.2440), with six indices of hydrogen deficiency. The IR spectrum suggested the absorption bands for hydroxy (3395 cm−1) and ester carbonyl (1733 cm−1) groups. The 1H and 13C NMR data of 2 were detailedly compared with those of 1, evidencing that 2 was an isomer of 1, which was further confirmed by the integrated evidence provided by the 1D and 2D NMR experiments (Table 1). The 1H NMR data of 2 established not only the replacement of an olefinic methine in 1 by an exo methylene at δH 2.38 and 2.20 (H2-9), but also the replacement of an allylic methyl in 1 by a olefinic exomethylene at δH 4.92 and 4.74 (H2-19). The 13C NMR data of 2 established the replacement of trisubstituted double bond at C8–C9 in 1 by a gem-disubstituted double bond at C8–C19 [C-8 (δC 143.2) and C-19 (δC 110.8)]. Additionally, the HMBC correlations of H2-9 to C-7 (δC 57.8), C-8, C-10 (δC 26.5), C-11 (δC 76.3), C-19, and H2-19 to C-7, C-8, C-9, confirmed the location of the double bond at C8–C19. Thus, the planar structure of 2 was assigned as 1:12,3:4,6:7-triepoxy-11-acetoxy-8,19-cembranene. The configurations and structure of 2 were further established by analysis of its NOESY correlations and coupling constants. The NOE correlations of H-3/H-2a, H-5b, H-6, H-11, Me-16; H-2a/Me-18; H-5b/H-3, H-7, Me-16, Me-17; H-6/H-9b, H-11, H-19, Me-18; H-7/H-5b, H-11; and H-11/H-3, H-6, Me-18, Me-20, showed that H-3, H-2a, H-5b, H-6, H-7, H-11, Me-18 and Me-20 were all in β, thus, rendering the 3,4-oxirane, 6,7-oxirane and the acetyl group at C-11 to be α orientations (Fig. 3). Additionally, the large coupling constant of JH-3,H-2b = 10.4 Hz, JH-5a,H-5b = 13.8 Hz, JH-6,H-5b = 10.4 Hz, JH-11,H-10b = 11.6 Hz, and the small coupling constant of JH-5a,H-6 = 2.4 Hz, JH-6,H-7 = 0 Hz, JH-11,H-10a = 1.6 Hz, as well as the biogenetic consideration, also indicated the above assigned orientations for H-3, H-6, H-7, H-11. Hence, the structure of 2 was defined as (1S,3R,4S,6R,7R,11R,12R)-1:12,3:4,6:7-triepoxy-11-acetoxy-8,19-cembrene (boscartins AI) with the aid of a computer-modeled 3D structure (Fig. 3) generated by MM2 force field calculations for energy minimization using the molecular modeling program Chem 3D Ultra 14.0. Compound 3 was presented as colorless oil with the molecular formula of C22H36O5 as determined by its positive HRESIMS experiment (m/z 381.2653 [M + H]+, calcd for 381.2596), with five indices of hydrogen deficiency. The IR spectrum suggested the absorption bands for hydroxy (3455 cm−1) and ester carbonyl (1734 cm−1) groups. The 1H and 13C NMR data of 3 were carefully compared with those of 1, clearly evidencing the consistent 1:12,3:4-diepoxy-11-acetoxy-containing cembrane type backbone between them, with the difference ascribed to signals at C-6 (δC 25.2), C-7 (δC 58.8), C-8 (δC 59.9), and C-9 (δC 30.6). The 1H NMR data of 3 established not only the replacement of an oxymethine in 1 by an exo methylene at δH 1.81 and 1.67 (H2-6), but also the replacement of an olefinic methine in 1 by an exo methylene at δH 1.61 and 1.58 (H2-9). The 13C NMR data of 3 established the epoxy ring of 6:7-epoxide in 1 was migrated to C-7 and C-8 in 3, and the trisubstituted double bond at C8–C9 in 1 was hydrogenised in 3. In-depth 2D NMR scrutiny established the above deduction. Obviously, the notable HMBC correlations of H-7 (δH 3.03) to C-5 (δC 36.0), C-6, C-8, C-9, Me-19 (δC 17.0) and Me-19 (δH 1.27) to C-7, C-8, C-9 indicated an oxygen bridge between C-7 and C-8, constructing a 1:12,3:4,7:8-triepoxy-11-acetoxy-cembrane motif for 3. The configurations and structure of 3 were further established by analysis of its NOESY correlations and coupling constants. The NOE correlations of H-3/H-15, Me-16, Me-17; H-7/H-11, Me-16, Me-17, Me-18, Me-19; H-11/H-7, H-10a, Me-18, Me-19, Me-20, showed that H-3, H-7, H-11, Me-18, Me-19 and Me-20 were all in β, thus, rendering the 3,4-oxirane, 7,8-oxirane and the acetyl group at C-11 to be α orientations (Fig. 3). Additionally, the large coupling constant of JH-11,H-10b = 11.2 Hz also indicated the above assigned orientation for H-11. Hence, the structure of 3 was defined as (1S,3R,4S,7R,8S,11R,12R)-1:12,3:4,7:8-triepoxy-11-acetoxy-cembrane (boscartins AJ) with the aid of a computer-modeled 3D structure (Fig. 3) generated by MM2 force field calculations for energy minimization using the molecular modeling program Chem 3D Ultra 14.0, as well as the biogenetic consideration. Compound 4 was presented as colorless oil with the molecular formula of C22H36O5 as determined by its positive HRESIMS experiment (m/z 379.2357 [M − H]−, calcd for 381.2596), with five indices of hydrogen deficiency. The IR spectrum suggested the absorption bands for hydroxy (3454 cm−1) and ester carbonyl (1737 cm−1) groups. The 1H and 13C NMR data of 4 were carefully compared with those of 9 (boscartins Q), clearly evidencing the resembled 1:12,3:4-diepoxy-11-acetoxy-7-cembranene type backbone between them. The only difference between them was ascribed to the migration of a hydroxy group from C-6 in 9 to C-9 in 4, which was further supported by the well-resolved HMBC correlations of H-6 (δH 2.25)/C-4 (δC 59.2), C-5 (δC 37.2), C-7 (δC 128.8), C-8 (δC 134.5); H-7 (δH 5.59)/C-5, C-6 (δC 23.4), C-9 (δC 87.2), Me-19 (δC 14.5); H-9 (δH 4.10)/C-7, C-8, C-10 (δC 31.9), C-11 (δC 76.1), Me-19; H-11 (δH 4.78)/C-9, C-10, C-12 (δC 83.0), C-13 (δC 35.4), Me-20 (δC 21.5), (δC 171.3); Me-19 (δH 1.73)/C-7, C-8, C-9, thus, constructing a 1:12,3:4-diepoxy-11-acetoxy-7-cembranene-9-ol motif for 4. The configurations and structure of 4 were further established by analysis of its NOESY correlations and coupling constants, as well as comparison those with 9. The NOE correlations of H-3/H-7, H-11, H-15, Me-16, Me-17, Me-18; H-9/H-7, H-10a, H-11; H-11/H-3, H-9, H-10a, Me-20; Me-18/H-3 showed that H-3, H-9, H-11, Me-18 and Me-20 were all in β, thus, rendering the 3,4-oxirane, the hydroxy group at C-9 and the acetyl group at C-11 to be α orientations (Fig. 3). The NOE correlations of H-11 and Me-18 were opposite to those observed in 9, further ascertaining the above orientations for H-3, H-9, H-11, and Me-18. Additionally, the large coupling constants of JH-9,H-10b = 10.8 Hz, JH-11,H-10b = 10.8 Hz, and JH-10a,H-10b = 12.8 Hz, as well as the little coupling of H-9/H-10a and H-11/H-10a, indicated an approximately 180° torsional angle not only between the intersecting H(9)C(9)C(10) and H(10b)C(10)C(9) flats, but also between the intersecting H(10b)C(10)C(11) and H(11)C(11)C(10) flats (Fig. 3), ascertaining the α orientations for the hydroxy group at C-9 and the acetyl group at C-11. Based on the NOE correlations of H-7/H-3 and Me-19/H-9, the olefinic geometry of C-7/C-8 was ascertained as E form. Hence, the structure of 4 was defined as (1S,3R,4S,9S,11R,12R,8E)-1:12,3:4-diepoxy-11-acetoxy-7-cembranene-9-ol (boscartins AK) with the aid of a computer-modeled 3D structure (Fig. 3) generated by MM2 force field calculations for energy minimization using the molecular modeling program Chem 3D Ultra 14.0, as well as the biogenetic consideration. Compound 5 was presented as colorless oil with the molecular formula of C22H36O5 as determined to be the same with 4 by its positive HRESIMS experiment (m/z 381.2635 [M + H]+, calcd for 381.2596), with five indices of hydrogen deficiency. The IR spectrum suggested the absorption bands for hydroxy (3425 cm−1) and ester carbonyl (1731 cm−1) groups. The 1H and 13C NMR data of 5 were detailedly compared with those of 4, evidencing that 5 was an isomer of 4, which was further confirmed by the integrated evidence provided by the 1D and 2D NMR experiments (Table 1). The 1H NMR data of 5 established not only the replacement of an oxymethine in 4 by an olefinic methine at δH 5.12 (H-3), but also the replacement of an olefinic methine in 4 by an oxymethine at δH 3.66 (H-7). The 13C NMR data of 5 established the replacement of an epoxy ring of 3:4-epoxide in 4 by a trisubstituted double bond at C3–C4 in 5 [C-3 (δC 118.9) and C-4 (δC 135.4)], the replacement of a trisubstituted double bond at C7–C8 in 4 by an oxymethine at C-7 (δC 69.7) and a nonprotonated oxygenated tertiary carbon at C-8 (δC 64.8). Additionally, the HMBC correlations of H-3 to C-1 (δC 89.2), C-2 (δC 28.8), C-5 (δC 32.3), Me-18 (δC 18.7); H-7 to C-6 (δC 31.2), C-8, Me-19 (δC 16.4); OH-7 (δH 4.25) to C-7; H-9 (δH 2.71) to C-8, C-10 (δC 27.7), Me-19; H-11 to C-9 (δC 63.8), C-10, C-12 (δC 82.8), C-13 (δC 35.3), Me-20 (δC 22.3), (δC 170.9); Me-18 (δH 1.64) to C-3, C-4, C-5; Me-19 (δH 1.27) to C-7, C-8, C-9, confirmed the location of the double bond at C3–C4, the hydroxy group at C-7, and the epoxy ring at C8–C9, in association with the five degrees of unsaturation. Thus, the planar structure of 5 was assigned as 1:12,8:9-diepoxy-11-acetoxy-3-cembranene-6-ol. The configurations and structure of 5 were further established by analysis of its NOESY correlations and coupling constants, as well as comparison those with 4. The NOE correlations of H-7/H-10b, Me-19; H-9/H-11, Me-19; H-11/H-9, H-10b; H-10a/Me-20, in association with the absence of H-11/Me-20, and H-7/Me-20, showed that H-10a and Me-20 were both in β, and H-7, H-9, H-11, and Me-19 were all in α, thus, rendering the hydroxy group at C-7, the 8,9-oxirane, and the acetyl group at C-11 to be β orientations (Fig. 3). The NOE correlations of H-11 were opposite to those observed in 4, further ascertaining the above orientations for H-7, H-9, H-11, and Me-19. Additionally, the large coupling constants of JH-7,H-6b = 10.0 Hz, JH-9,H-10a = 10.8 Hz, and JH-11,H-10a = 11.6 Hz, as well as small coupling constant of JH-9,H-10b = 3.2 Hz and the little coupling of H-7/H-6a and H-11/H-10b, indicated an approximately 180° torsional angle between the intersecting H(6b)C(6)C(7) and H(7)C(7)C(6) flats, between the intersecting H(9)C(9)C(10) and H(10a)C(10)C(9) flats, between the intersecting H(10a)C(10)C(11) and H(11)C(11)C(10) flats (Fig. 3), ascertaining the β orientations for the hydroxy group at C-9, the epoxy ring at C8–C9, and the acetyl group at C-11. Based on the NOE correlations of H-3/H-10b and Me-18/H-2a, the olefinic geometry of C-3/C-4 was ascertained as E form. Hence, the structure of 5 was defined as (1S,7S,8S,9R,11S,12R,3E)-1:12,8:9-diepoxy-11-acetoxy-3-cembranene-7-ol (boscartins AL) with the aid of a computer-modeled 3D structure (Fig. 3) generated by MM2 force field calculations for energy minimization using the molecular modeling program Chem 3D Ultra 14.0, as well as the biogenetic consideration. Compound 6 was presented as colorless oil with the molecular formula of C22H36O5 as determined to be the same with 4 and 5 by its positive HRESIMS experiment (m/z 403.2455 [M + Na]+, calcd for 403.2460), with five indices of hydrogen deficiency. The IR spectrum suggested the absorption bands for hydroxy (3427 cm−1) and ester carbonyl (1733 cm−1) groups. The 1H and 13C NMR data of 6 were detailedly compared with those of 4 and 5, evidencing that 6 was an isomer of 4 and 5, which was further confirmed by the integrated evidence provided by the 1D and 2D NMR experiments (Table 2). The 1H NMR data of 6 established not only the replacement of an exo methylene in 5 by an olefinic methine at δH 5.69 (H-2), but also the replacement of an oxymethine in 5 by an exo methylene at δH 1.99, 0.89 (H2-9). The 13C NMR data of 6 established the migration of a double bond from C3–C4 in 5 to C2–C3 [C-2 (δC 135.9), C-3 (δC 131.2)], and the replacement of a trisubstituted olefinic carbon at C4 in 5 by a nonprotonated oxygenated tertiary carbon at C-4 (δC 81.3), as well as the migration of an epoxy ring from C8–C9 in 5 to C7–C8 [C-7 (δC 64.4), C-8 (δC 61.4) and C-9 (δC 34.3)]. Additionally, the HMBC correlations of H-2 to C-1 (δC 88.9), C-3, C-4, C-14 (δC 34.4); H-3 (δH 5.63) to C-1, C-2, C-4, C-5 (δC 35.0), Me-18 (δC 23.4); OH-4 (δH 10.83) to C-4; H-7 (δH 2.91) to C-5, C-6 (δC 21.9), C-8; H-11 (δH 4.91) to C-9 (δC 34.3), C-10 (δC 25.8), C-12 (δC 83.6), Me-20 (δC 21.2), (δC 171.2); Me-18 (δH 1.30) to C-3, C-4, C-5; Me-19 (δH 1.30) to C-7, C-8, C-9, confirmed the location of the double bond at C2–C3, the hydroxy group at C-4, and the epoxy ring at C7–C8, in association with the five degrees of unsaturation. Thus, the planar structure of 6 was assigned as 1:12,7:8-diepoxy-11-acetoxy-2-cembranene-4-ol.

1H (400 MHz) and 13C (100 MHz) NMR data for compounds 5–8 (δ in ppm, J in Hz)

No.5a6b7a8a
δ H δ C δ H δ C δ H δ C δ H δ C
189.288.989.989.8
2a2.32 dd(5.6, 16.0)28.85.69 d(15.6)135.91.89 m28.52.47 dd(6.0, 14.0)31.5
2b1.97 dd(5.6, 16.0)1.87 m2.38 dd(10.0, 14.0)
3a5.12 t(5.6)118.95.63 d(15.6)131.22.37 m30.86.54 dd(6.0, 9.2)141.1
3b1.99 m
4135.481.3146.4141.1
5a2.23 m32.32.13 m35.03.18 s58.5198.8
5b2.17 m1.74 overlapped
6a1.85 overlapped31.21.74 overlapped21.92.90 dt(9.6, 2.0)62.42.95 dd(8.8, 13.6)40.6
6b1.76 overlapped1.55 overlapped2.82 d(13.6)
7a3.66 d(10.0)69.72.91 t(5.6)64.42.75 d(16.8)40.93.25 d(8.4)59.8
7b1.86 overlapped
864.861.4133.761.7
9a2.71 dd(3.2, 10.8)63.81.99 overlapped34.35.31 dd(5.6, 9.6)120.62.06 m34.1
9b0.89 m0.96 m
10a2.11 dt(11.6, 2.8)27.71.90 overlapped25.82.21 dd(5.6, 14.4)29.31.93 m25.1
10b2.14 t(11.6)1.53 overlapped2.11 dt(9.6, 14.4)1.63 overlapped
114.90 d(11.6)74.44.91 d(9.6)77.14.93 dd(3.2, 9.6)76.44.70 d(10.8)74.2
1282.883.683.583.2
13a1.76 overlapped35.31.55 overlapped (2H)35.61.74 overlapped35.81.67 overlapped (2H)34.9
13b1.71 overlapped1.70 overlapped
14a1.80 overlapped31.01.84 overlapped (2H)34.41.73 overlapped(2H)30.31.78 overlapped30.7
14b1.76 overlapped1.66 overlapped
151.76 overlapped36.01.65 m38.21.80 m36.31.83 m36.8
160.87 d(6.8)19.00.81 t(6.8) (6H)18.80.88 d(6.8)19.00.93 d(6.8)19.0
170.95 d(6.8)16.70.81 t(6.8) (6H)17.70.97 d(6.8)16.71.01 d(6.8)16.8
181.64 s18.71.30 s(6H)23.44.92 s, 4.81 s109.41.79 s11.8
191.27 s16.41.30 s(6H)16.91.64 s17.91.44 s17.0
201.23 s22.31.05 s21.21.20 s22.91.18 s22.0
2.10 s21.12.00 s21.32.10 s21.22.00 s21.0
170.9171.2171.3171.0
OH4.79 d(4.8) (OH-7)10.78 s(OH-4)

1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained in CDCl3.

1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained in DMSO-d6.

1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained in CDCl3. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained in DMSO-d6. The configurations and structure of 6 were further established by analysis of its NOESY correlations and coupling constants, as well as comparison those with 4 and 5. The NOE correlations of OH-4/H-5a, Me-16, Me-19; H-7/H-9b, H-11, Me-19; H-11/H-7, H-9b, H-10a, Me-19, Me-20; H-10a/Me-20, showed that OH-4, H-7, H-11, Me-19 and Me-20 were both in β, and Me-18 was in α, thus, rendering the hydroxy group at C-4, the 7,8-oxirane, and the acetyl group at C-11 to be α orientations (Fig. 3). Additionally, the large coupling constant of JH-11,H-10b = 9.6 Hz, as well as the little coupling of H-11/H-10b, ascertained the β orientation for the hydroxy group at C-4, as well as the α orientations for the epoxy ring at C7–C8 and the acetyl group at C-11. Based on the large coupling constant of JH-2,H-3 = 15.6 Hz, the olefinic geometry of C-2/C-3 was ascertained as E form. Hence, the structure of 6 was defined as (1S,4R,7S,8R,11R,12R,2E)-1:12,7:8-diepoxy-11-acetoxy-2-cembranene-4-ol (boscartins AM) with the aid of a computer-modeled 3D structure (Fig. 3) generated by MM2 force field calculations for energy minimization using the molecular modeling program Chem 3D Ultra 14.0, as well as the biogenetic consideration. Compound 7 was presented as colorless oil with the molecular formula of C22H34O4 as determined by its positive HRESIMS experiment (m/z 385.2346 [M + Na]+, calcd for 385.2355), with six indices of hydrogen deficiency. The IR spectrum suggested the absorption bands for hydroxy (3442 cm−1) and ester carbonyl (1731 cm−1) groups. The 1H and 13C NMR data of 7 were detailedly compared with those of 1, clearly evidencing the consistent 1:12-triepoxy-11-acetoxy-8-cembranene type backbone between them, with the difference ascribed to signals at C-3 (δC 30.8), C-4 (δC 146.4), C-5 (δC 58.5), C-7 (δC 40.9) and Me-18 (δC 109.4). The 1H NMR data of 7 established the replacement of an oxymethine in 1 by an exo methylene at δH 2.37 and 1.99 (H2-3), the replacement of an exo methylene in 1 by an oxymethine at δH 3.18 (H-5), the replacement of an oxymethine in 1 by an exo methylene at δH 2.75 and 1.86 (H2-7), and the replacement of a methyl in 1 by an olefinic exomethylene at δH 4.92 and 4.81 (H2-18). The 13C NMR data of 7 established the epoxy ring of 3:4-epoxide and the linked methyl at C-18 in 1 were transformed into an exo methylene at C-3 and a gem-disubstituted double bond at C4–C18, and the migration of an epoxy ring from C6–C7 in 1 to C5–C6 [C-5, C-6 (δC 62.4), C-7]. In-depth 2D NMR scrutiny established the above deduction. Obviously, the notable HMBC correlations of H-3 to C-2 (δC 28.5), C-4, C-5, Me-18; H-5 to C-4, C-6, C-7, Me-18; H-6 (δH 2.90) to C-7; H-7a (δH 2.75) to C-6, C-8 (δC 133.7), C-9 (δC 120.6); H-9 (δH 5.31) to C-7, Me-19 (δC 17.9); H-11 (δH 4.93) to C-12 (δC 83.5), C-13 (δC 35.8), Me-20 (δC 22.9), (δC 171.3); H2-18 to C-3, C-4, C-5; Me-19 (δH 1.64) to C-7, C-8, C-9, indicated a gem-disubstituted double bond at C4–C18, an oxygen bridge between C-5 and C-6, and a trisubstituted double bond at C8–C9, constructing a 1:12,5:6-diepoxy-11-acetoxy-4(18),7-cembrandien motif for 7. The configurations and structure of 7 were further established by analysis of its NOESY correlations and coupling constants, as well as comparison those with 1. The NOE correlations of H-5/H-3a, H-7a, H-11, Me-16, Me-20; H-6/H-3a, H-7a, H-11, Me-17, Me-20; H-11/H-5, H-10a, Me-20, showed that H-5, H-6, H-11, Me-16, Me-17 and Me-20 were both in β, thus, rendering the 5,6-oxirane, and the acetyl group at C-11 to be α orientations (Fig. 3). Additionally, the large coupling constant of JH-6,H-7b = 9.6 Hz, JH-7a,H-7b = 16.8 Hz, JH-9,H-10b = 9.6 Hz, JH-11,H-10b = 9.6 Hz, as well as the little coupling of H-5/H-6 and the small coupling constant of JH-6,H-7a = 2.0 Hz, JH-9,H-10a = 5.6 Hz, JH-11,H-10a = 3.2 Hz, ascertained the α orientations for the epoxy ring at C5–C6 and the acetyl group at C-11. Based on the NOE correlations of H-9/Me-19, the olefinic geometry of C-8/C-9 was ascertained as Z form. Hence, the structure of 7 was defined as (1R,5R,6R,11R,12R,8Z)-1:12,5:6-diepoxy-11-acetoxy-4(18),7-cembrandien (boscartins AN) with the aid of a computer-modeled 3D structure (Fig. 3) generated by MM2 force field calculations for energy minimization using the molecular modeling program Chem 3D Ultra 14.0, as well as the biogenetic consideration. Compound 8 was presented as colorless oil with the molecular formula of C22H34O5 as determined by its positive HRESIMS experiment (m/z 379.2487 [M + H]+, calcd for 379.2440), with six indices of hydrogen deficiency. The IR spectrum suggested the absorption bands for hydroxy (3448 cm−1), ester carbonyl (1737 cm−1), and conjugated carbonyl (1687 cm−1) groups. The 1H and 13C NMR data of 8 were detailedly compared with those of 10 (boscartins Z), clearly evidencing the consistent 1:12-triepoxy-11-acetoxy-5-oxo-3-cembranene type backbone between them, with the difference ascribed to signals at C-6 (δC 40.6), C-7 (δC 59.8), and C-8 (δC 61.7). The 1H NMR data of 8 established the replacement of an olefinic methine in 10 by an exo methylene at δH 2.95 and 2.82 (H2-6), and the replacement of an olefinic methine in 10 by an oxymethine at δH 3.25 (H-7). The 13C NMR data of 8 established the replacement of a double bond in 10 by an exo methylene and an oxymethine at C-6 and C-7. In-depth 2D NMR scrutiny established the above deduction. Obviously, the notable HMBC correlations of H-3 (δH 6.54) to C-2 (δC 31.5), C-5 (δC 198.8), Me-18 (δC 11.8); H-6 to C-4 (δC 141.1), C-5, C-7; H-7 to C-5, C-6; H-9a (δH 2.06) to C-8, C-10 (δC 25.1), C-11 (δC 74.2), Me-19 (δC 17.0); H-10a (δH 1.93) to C-8, C-9 (δC 34.1); H-11 (δH 4.70) to C-9, C-10, C-12 (δC 83.2), Me-20 (δC 22.0), (δC 171.0); Me-19 (δH 1.44) to C-7, C-8, C-9, indicated a trisubstituted double bond at C3–C4, a keto at C-5, an oxygen bridge between C-7 and C-8, in association with the six degrees of unsaturation. Thus, the planar structure of 8 was assigned as 1:12,7:8-diepoxy-11-acetoxy-5-oxo-3-cembranene. The configurations and structure of 8 were further established by analysis of its NOESY correlations and coupling constants, as well as comparison those with 10. The NOE correlations of H-7/H-6b, H-11, Me-17, Me-19, Me-20; H-11/H-3, H-7, H-10a, Me-17, Me-19, Me-20; Me-19/H-9a, H-10a; Me-20/H-10a, showed that H-7, H-11, Me-17, Me-19 and Me-20 were both in β, thus, rendering the 7,8-oxirane, and the acetyl group at C-11 to be α orientations (Fig. 3). Additionally, the large coupling constant of JH-7,H-6a = 8.8 Hz, JH-6a,H-6b = 13.6 Hz, JH-11,H-10b = 10.8 Hz, as well as the little coupling of H-7/H-6b and H-11/H-10b, ascertained the α orientations for the epoxy ring at C7–C8 and the acetyl group at C-11. Based on the NOE correlations of H-3/H-6b, H-11, Me-19, and Me-18/H-2b, the olefinic geometry of C-3/C-4 was ascertained as E form. Hence, the structure of 8 was defined as (1S,7R,8S,11R,12R,8Z)-1:12,7:8-diepoxy-11-acetoxy-5-oxo-3-cembranene (boscartins AO) with the aid of a computer-modeled 3D structure (Fig. 3) generated by MM2 force field calculations for energy minimization using the molecular modeling program Chem 3D Ultra 14.0, as well as the biogenetic consideration. The two known compounds, boscartins Q (9)[3] and boscartins Z (10)[3] were identified by comparison of their spectroscopic data (1H and 13C NMR, MS) with the literature values. A speculative biogenetic pathway for all the isolated compounds except 2 was shown in Fig. 4. Incensole obtained as the main cembrane-type diterpenoid from the gum resin of B. carterii,[14,18-20] is proposed as the precursor for the other cembranes, which gradually acetylized, oxidized, and isomerized to their derivatives. Isolated compounds (1–10) were examined for the antiproliferative activity against HCT-116 human colon cancer cell, anti-inflammatory activity against nitric oxide (NO) production, and hepatoprotective activity, with cisplatin (5.6 μM), dexamethasone (2.2 μM), and bicyclol being used as the positive controls, respectively. All of them showed weak antiproliferative activity (IC50 > 100 μM), and 8 exhibited potent inhibitory effects on NO production (IC50 of 14.8 μM), with the others showing weak anti-inflammatory activity (IC50 > 30 μM), and all compounds except for 7 and 8 exhibited hepatoprotective activity at 10 μM (Table 3), among which 1 exhibited more potent hepatoprotective activity than the positive control, bicyclol, against the damage induced by paracetamol in HepG2 cells (inhibition rate of 45.7%), with 2 exhibiting slightly lower hepatoprotective activity than bicyclol (inhibition rate of 21.0%).
Fig. 4

Speculative biogenetic pathways for the isolated compounds.

Protective effects of compounds 1–10 (10 μM) against cytotoxicity induced by paracetamol in HepG2 cellsa

No.Cell viability (% of blank)Inhibition rate (%)
Blank100
Control50.8
Bicyclol67.7b27.8
175.5c < 0.00145.7
268.0b < 0.0121.0
357.56.1
463.6c < 0.00113.6
551.92.5
661.8c < 0.0019.3
749.4−2.9
844.0−4.6
962.9d < 0.0512.9
1064.1c < 0.00114.0

Results were expressed as the means ± SD (n = 3 for blank, control, bicyclol and all isolated compounds); bicyclol was used as the positive control (10 μM).

P < 0.01, compared with control group.

P < 0.001, compared with control group.

P < 0.05 compared with control group.

Results were expressed as the means ± SD (n = 3 for blank, control, bicyclol and all isolated compounds); bicyclol was used as the positive control (10 μM). P < 0.01, compared with control group. P < 0.001, compared with control group. P < 0.05 compared with control group.

Experimental section

General experimental procedures

Optical rotations were obtained using a SEEWE SGW-2 digital polarimeter in MeOH. HRESIMS were determined on a Bruker Impact II mass spectrometer. IR spectra were collected using a Nicolet 5700 spectrometer. NMR spectra were determined using a BURKER 400 NMR in CDCl3 and DMSO-d6. Silica gel (200–300 mesh) and ODS C18 silica gel (YMC Co., Ltd., Japan) were used for column chromatography (CC) separation. Semipreparative CC separations were carried out using a Shimadzu LC-6AD instrument, in association with a SPD-10A detector and a reversed-phase C18 column (YMC-Pack ODS-AU 20 × 250 mm, 10 μm). All solvents used were of analytical grade.

Plant material

Olibanum, the gum resin of Boswellia carterii Birdw., used in this study were the same as those in our previous study,[21,22] as well as the medicine origin.

Extraction and isolation

The gum resin of B. carterii (6 kg) was extracted with 95% EtOH, which were portioned subsequently with petroleum ether (PE), CH2Cl2, EtOAc, and n-BuOH as previously described.[19,20] The combined PE fraction (2000 g) was further separated by CC over silica gel rapidly eluted with PE, CH2Cl2 and EtOAc. The eluted PE fraction was combined together and further separated by silica gel CC eluted with gradient solvents of PE–EtOAc (100 : 0 → 0 : 1) to yield 4 fractions. Fraction 1 [PE–EtOAc (50 : 1), 14.0 g] was applied to silica gel CC eluted with gradient solvents of PE–EtOAc (100 : 0 → 25 : 1) to yield 11 fractions (F1-1–F1-11). F1-2 [PE–EtOAc (25 : 1), 20 mg] was separated by preparative HPLC system [mobile phase: CH3CN/H2O (90%); flow rate: 3 mL min−1; UV detection at 210] resulting in the isolation of 7 (12 mg). F1-3 [PE–EtOAc (25 : 1), 200 mg] was separated by preparative HPLC system [mobile phase: CH3CN/H2O (90%); flow rate: 5 mL min−1; UV detection at 210] resulting in the isolation of 9 (78 mg). F1-6 [PE–EtOAc (10 : 1), 80 mg] was separated by preparative HPLC system [mobile phase: CH3CN/H2O (70%); flow rate: 5 mL min−1; UV detection at 210] resulting in the isolation of 1 (25 mg) and 2 (21 mg). F1-7 [PE–EtOAc (10 : 1), 65 mg] was separated by preparative HPLC system [mobile phase: CH3CN/H2O (70%); flow rate: 5 mL min−1; UV detection at 230] resulting in the isolation of 3 (20 mg) and 8 (5 mg). F1-9 [PE–EtOAc (5 : 1), 80 mg] was separated by preparative HPLC system [mobile phase: CH3CN/H2O (65%); flow rate: 5 mL min−1; UV detection at 210] resulting in the isolation of 4 (13 mg), 5 (6 mg) and 6 (40 mg). Fraction 3 [PE–EtOAc (15 : 1), 15.0 g] was applied to silica gel CC eluted with gradient solvents of PE–EtOAc (100 : 0 → 25 : 1) to yield 10 fractions (F3-1–F3-10). F3-6 [PE–EtOAc (3 : 1), 10 mg] was separated by preparative HPLC system [mobile phase: CH3CN/H2O (55%); flow rate: 5 mL min−1; UV detection at 230] resulting in the isolation of 10 (4 mg).

Boscartins AH (1)

Colorless oil (CH3OH–CHCl3); [α]D25 = −40.9° (c 0.67, CHCl3); IR (KBr) νmax: 3476, 2961, 2927, 2875, 1736, 1466, 1372, 1234, 1108, 1024 cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) and 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz), see Table 1; HRESI-MS (positive mode) m/z: 379.2505 [M + H]+ (calcd for C22H35O5, 379.2440).

Boscartins AI (2)

Colorless oil (CH3OH–CHCl3); [α]D25 = +31.8° (c 0.67, CHCl3); IR (KBr) νmax: 3395, 2954, 2872, 1733, 1467, 1378, 1370, 1234, 1047, 1022 cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) and 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz), see Table 1; HRESI-MS (positive mode) m/z: 379.2521 [M + H]+ (calcd for C22H35O5, 379.2440).

Boscartins AJ (3)

Colorless oil (CH3OH–CHCl3); [α]D25 = +7.8° (c 0.57, CHCl3); IR (KBr) νmax: 3455, 2958, 2925, 1734, 1463, 1376, 1241, 1082, 1039 cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) and 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz), see Table 1; HRESI-MS (positive mode) m/z: 381.2653 [M + H]+ (calcd for C22H37O5, 381.2596).

Boscartins AK (4)

Colorless oil (CH3OH–CHCl3); [α]D25 = +12.5° (c 0.37, CHCl3); IR (KBr) νmax: 3454, 3293, 2964, 2921, 1737, 1456, 1365, 1234, 1101, 1048, 1031 cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) and 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz), see Table 1; HRESI-MS (negative mode) m/z: 379.2357 [M − H]− (calcd for C22H35O5, 381.2596).

Boscartins AL (5)

Colorless oil (CH3OH–CHCl3); [α]D25 = +40.5° (c 0.11, CHCl3); IR (KBr) νmax: 3425, 2973, 2932, 1731, 1443, 1375, 1239, 1110, 1049, 1026, 1006 cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz) and 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz), see Table 2; HRESI-MS (positive mode) m/z: 381.2635 [M + H]+ (calcd for C22H37O5, 381.2596).

Boscartins AM (6)

Colorless oil (CH3OH–CHCl3); [α]D25 = +17.0° (c 1.00, CHCl3); IR (KBr) νmax: 3427, 2964, 2930, 1733, 1461, 1373, 1241, 1028 cm−1; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) and 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 MHz), see Table 2; HRESI-MS (positive mode) m/z: 403.2455 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C22H36O5Na, 403.2460).

Boscartins AN (7)

Colorless oil (CH3OH–CHCl3); [α]D25 = −27.9° (c 0.33, CHCl3); IR (KBr) νmax: 3442, 2956, 2923, 1731, 1462, 1376, 1241, 1100, 1032 cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) and 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz), see Table 2; HRESI-MS (positive mode) m/z: 385.2346 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C22H34O4Na, 385.2355).

Boscartins AO (8)

Colorless oil (CH3OH–CHCl3); [α]D25 = −12.0° (c 0.13, CHCl3); IR (KBr) νmax: 3448, 2971, 1737, 1687, 1619, 1445, 1373, 1237, 1112, 1046, 1026 cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) and 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz), see Table 2; HRESI-MS (positive mode) m/z: 379.2487 [M + H]+ (calcd for C22H35O5, 379.2440).

Biological assays

Antiproliferative assessment

Compounds 1–10 were screened for the antiproliferative activity against HCT-116 human colon cancer cell by the MTT method used previously in our study.[21,22]

Anti-inflammatory activity assay against NO production

Compounds 1–10 were assayed for the inhibitory activity against NO production in RAW264.7 mouse peritoneal macrophages by the method used previously in our study.[21,22]

Protective effect on cytotoxicity induced by paracetamol in HepG2 cells

Compounds 1–10 were investigated for the hepatoprotective activity in HepG2 cells by the MTT method used previously.[23,24] HepG2 cells were planted in 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 104 per well and incubated in 100 μL RPMI 1640 for 24 h with the conditions of 37 °C and 5% CO2. To calculate the IC50 values of 1–10, firstly five varied concentrations of samples (20, 10, 5, 2.5, 1.25 μM) were administered to the HepG2 cells for 1 h with bicyclol used as the positive control. And then the cytotoxicity of the cultured cells was induced by adding paracetamol (concentration of 8 μM). After 48 h of treatment, the cell supernatants were discarded and 100 μL MTT (concentration of 0.5 mg mL−1) was added to the cells to form formazan. Four hours later, 100 μL DMSO was added after discarding the supernatants. The resulted optical density values of each well were measured at 490 nm. The inhibition rate is designated as below:Inhibition rate (%) = [(OD(test) − OD(control))/(OD(blank) − OD(control))] × 100%.

Conclusions

As part of an ongoing research for cembrane-type diterpenoids with diverse structures and significant activities from the gum resin of Boswellia carterii, a phytochemical investigation of the petroleum ether extract was conducted, leading the isolation of eight new cembrane-type diterpenoids, boscartins AH-AK (1–8), along with two known ones (9-10). These eight undescribed cembranoids were characteristic of high oxidation assignable to either three or two epoxy groups connected to the 14-membered acrocycle, as well as a acetyl group at C-11. All isolates were evaluated for antiproliferative activity against HCT-116 human colon cancer cell and anti-inflammatory activity against nitric oxide (NO) production in vitro. All of them showed weak antiproliferative activity (IC50 > 100 μM), and 8 exhibited potent inhibitory effects on NO production (IC50 of 14.8 μM), with the others showing weak anti-inflammatory activity (IC50 > 30 μM), and all compounds except for 7 and 8 exhibited hepatoprotective activity at 10 μM. Results of the inhibitory effects on NO production indicated that a keto functionality in the structure might play an important role for anti-inflammatory activity. As for the hepatoprotective activity, compound 1 exhibited more potent hepatoprotective activity than the positive control, with 2 exhibiting slightly lower hepatoprotective activity than bicyclol, which indicated that three epoxy groups and a double bond in the structure might play an important role for hepatoprotective activity. This study not only provided abundant categories of cembrane-type diterpenoids in gum resin of Boswellia carterii, but also dug out the potential active functionality for further structural modification of these cembranoids.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.
  16 in total

1.  Neuroactive and Anti-inflammatory Frankincense Cembranes: A Structure-Activity Study.

Authors:  Federica Pollastro; Samantha Golin; Giuseppina Chianese; Masteria Yunovilsa Putra; Aniello Schiano Moriello; Luciano De Petrocellis; Victor García; Eduardo Munoz; Orazio Taglialatela-Scafati; Giovanni Appendino
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.050

2.  Bioactive cembrane-type diterpenoids from the gum-resin of Boswellia carterii.

Authors:  Yan-Gai Wang; Jin Ren; Jie Ma; Jian-Bo Yang; Tengfei Ji; Ai-Guo Wang
Journal:  Fitoterapia       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Major constituents of Boswellia carteri resin exhibit cyclooxygenase enzyme inhibition and antiproliferative activity.

Authors:  Sami I Ali; Chuan-Rui Zhang; Amal A Mohamed; Farouk K El-Baz; Ahmad K Hegazy; Maimona A Kord; Muraleedharan G Nair
Journal:  Nat Prod Commun       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.986

4.  Extraction and purification of five terpenoids from olibanum by ultrahigh pressure technique and high-speed countercurrent chromatography.

Authors:  Jinqian Yu; Hongwei Zhao; Daijie Wang; Xiangyun Song; Lei Zhao; Xiao Wang
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.645

Review 5.  Boswellic extracts and 11-keto-ß-boswellic acids prevent type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus by suppressing the expression of proinflammatory cytokines.

Authors:  H P T Ammon
Journal:  Phytomedicine       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 5.340

6.  Rosmarinic acid attenuates hepatic steatosis by modulating ER stress and autophagy in oleic acid-induced HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Govindaraj Jayanthy Balachander; Sorimuthupillai Subramanian; Kaliappan Ilango
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 7.  Boswellic acids: a group of medicinally important compounds.

Authors:  Bhahwal Ali Shah; Ghulam Nabi Qazi; Subhash Chandra Taneja
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 13.423

8.  Chemical differentiation of Boswellia sacra and Boswellia carterii essential oils by gas chromatography and chiral gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Cole L Woolley; Mahmoud M Suhail; Brett L Smith; Karen E Boren; Lindsey C Taylor; Marc F Schreuder; Jeremiah K Chai; Hervé Casabianca; Sadqa Haq; Hsueh-Kung Lin; Ahmed A Al-Shahri; Saif Al-Hatmi; D Gary Young
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.759

9.  Cembranoids from the Gum Resin of Boswellia carterii as Potential Antiulcerative Colitis Agents.

Authors:  Jin Ren; Yan-Gai Wang; Ai-Guo Wang; Lian-Qiu Wu; Hai-Jing Zhang; Wen-Jie Wang; Ya-Lun Su; Hai-Lin Qin
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 4.050

10.  Sarcoehrenbergilides D-F: cytotoxic cembrene diterpenoids from the soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi.

Authors:  Mohamed-Elamir F Hegazy; Tarik A Mohamed; Abdelsamed I Elshamy; Ahmed R Hamed; Mahmoud A A Ibrahim; Shinji Ohta; Akemi Umeyama; Paul W Paré; Thomas Efferth
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.361

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.