Literature DB >> 35493622

Power of big data to improve patient care in gastroenterology.

Jamie Catlow1,2, Benjamin Bray3,4, Eva Morris5, Matt Rutter1,2.   

Abstract

Big data is defined as being large, varied or frequently updated, and usually generated from real-world interaction. With the unprecedented availability of big data, comes an obligation to maximise its potential for healthcare improvements in treatment effectiveness, disease prevention and healthcare delivery. We review the opportunities and challenges that big data brings to gastroenterology. We review its sources for healthcare improvement in gastroenterology, including electronic medical records, patient registries and patient-generated data. Big data can complement traditional research methods in hypothesis generation, supporting studies and disseminating findings; and in some cases holds distinct advantages where traditional trials are unfeasible. There is great potential power in patient-level linkage of datasets to help quantify inequalities, identify best practice and improve patient outcomes. We exemplify this with the UK colorectal cancer repository and the potential of linkage using the National Endoscopy Database, the inflammatory bowel disease registry and the National Health Service bowel cancer screening programme. Artificial intelligence and machine learning are increasingly being used to improve diagnostics in gastroenterology, with image analysis entering clinical practice, and the potential of machine learning to improve outcome prediction and diagnostics in other clinical areas. Big data brings issues with large sample sizes, real-world biases, data curation, keeping clinical context at analysis and General Data Protection Regulation compliance. There is a tension between our obligation to use data for the common good and protecting individual patient's data. We emphasise the importance of engaging with our patients to enable them to understand their data usage as fully as they wish. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trials; health service research; statistics

Year:  2021        PMID: 35493622      PMCID: PMC8996101          DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2041-4137


  28 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors for delayed colonic post-polypectomy bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Veeravich Jaruvongvanich; Narut Prasitlumkum; Buravej Assavapongpaiboon; Sakolwan Suchartlikitwong; Anawin Sanguankeo; Sikarin Upala
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Three Problems with Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.

Authors:  Benjamin Chin-Yee; Ross Upshur
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.416

3.  Genetic Misdiagnoses and the Potential for Health Disparities.

Authors:  Arjun K Manrai; Birgit H Funke; Heidi L Rehm; Morten S Olesen; Bradley A Maron; Peter Szolovits; David M Margulies; Joseph Loscalzo; Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Applying a natural language processing tool to electronic health records to assess performance on colonoscopy quality measures.

Authors:  Ateev Mehrotra; Evan S Dellon; Robert E Schoen; Melissa Saul; Faraz Bishehsari; Carrie Farmer; Henk Harkema
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Hybrid clinical trials to generate real-world evidence: design considerations from a sponsor's perspective.

Authors:  Ming Zhu; Saranya Sridhar; Rosalind Hollingsworth; Ayman Chit; Tammy Kimball; Kerry Murmello; Michael Greenberg; Sanjay Gurunathan; Josh Chen
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 6.  From Big Data to Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Tim Hulsen; Saumya S Jamuar; Alan R Moody; Jason H Karnes; Orsolya Varga; Stine Hedensted; Roberto Spreafico; David A Hafler; Eoin F McKinney
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-03-01

7.  Machine learning in medicine: a practical introduction.

Authors:  Jenni A M Sidey-Gibbons; Chris J Sidey-Gibbons
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Application of optical character recognition with natural language processing for large-scale quality metric data extraction in colonoscopy reports.

Authors:  Sobia Nasir Laique; Umar Hayat; Shashank Sarvepalli; Byron Vaughn; Mounir Ibrahim; John McMichael; Kanza Noor Qaiser; Carol Burke; Amit Bhatt; Colin Rhodes; Maged K Rizk
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on UK endoscopic activity and cancer detection: a National Endoscopy Database Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; Matthew Brookes; Thomas J Lee; Peter Rogers; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Machine-learning based patient classification using Hepatitis B virus full-length genome quasispecies from Asian and European cohorts.

Authors:  Alan J Mueller-Breckenridge; Fernando Garcia-Alcalde; Steffen Wildum; Saskia L Smits; Robert A de Man; Margo J H van Campenhout; Willem P Brouwer; Jianjun Niu; John A T Young; Isabel Najera; Lina Zhu; Daitze Wu; Tomas Racek; Gadissa Bedada Hundie; Yong Lin; Charles A Boucher; David van de Vijver; Bart L Haagmans
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic Imaging Technology Today.

Authors:  Axel Boese; Cora Wex; Roland Croner; Uwe Bernd Liehr; Johann Jakob Wendler; Jochen Weigt; Thorsten Walles; Ulrich Vorwerk; Christoph Hubertus Lohmann; Michael Friebe; Alfredo Illanes
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.